This bill amends section 4m of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 6m) to add an exemption for charitable organizations (as defined by section 3(c)(10)(D) of the Investment Company Act) and related personnel from the Act’s prohibition on using the mails or interstate commerce as unregistered commodity trading advisors (CTAs) or commodity pool operators (CPOs). The text also incorporates related carve-outs for entities and accounts excluded under section 3(c)(10) and 3(c)(14) of the Investment Company Act, a small-adviser safe harbor, and an SEC-registered-adviser exception; it preserves securities-law obligations and makes certain disclosure and CFTC-proceeding requirements applicable.
The change reduces CFTC registration and transactional restrictions for charities and individuals acting on a charity’s behalf, which can lower compliance costs and operational friction for nonprofit endowments, donor-advised funds, and similar entities. At the same time the amendment shifts regulatory emphasis toward securities-law disclosure and leaves unresolved questions about the scope of the exemption, which compliance officers and legal teams will need to navigate carefully.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill rewrites 7 U.S.C. 6m to exclude qualifying charitable organizations (and trustees, officers, employees, volunteers acting within scope) from the CFTC’s registration and interstate-communications prohibition for CTAs and CPOs, subject to several limits and exceptions including small-advisor and SEC-registered-adviser carve-outs. It preserves Securities Act and Exchange Act obligations and adds a cross-reference disclosure requirement to the Investment Company Act.
Who It Affects
Charitable organizations that advise, operate, or sponsor commodity pools or otherwise trade commodity interests on behalf of charities or investment vehicles excluded under Investment Company Act sections 3(c)(10) or 3(c)(14), as well as their trustees, directors, officers, employees, and volunteers. It also affects CFTC and SEC oversight practices, prime brokers, and counterparties that transact with these nonprofit-led pools.
Why It Matters
The bill reduces CFTC compliance burdens for nonprofits that trade commodity interests but does not remove securities-law obligations, creating a cross-agency compliance landscape. Professionals managing nonprofit investments, counsel advising trustees, and risk teams at counterparties must reassess registration, disclosure, and due-diligence practices.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill replaces the current Section 4m text of the Commodity Exchange Act to keep the core prohibition—unregistered CTAs and CPOs generally cannot use mail or interstate commerce—while adding multiple statutory exceptions. The standout addition is an explicit exemption that covers charitable organizations as defined by the Investment Company Act and individuals acting within their official roles, but only when advisory or pool activities are carried out solely on behalf of those charities or certain excluded investment vehicles.
The statute also continues several existing narrow exceptions, adds a typical small-adviser threshold and an exception for SEC-registered advisers that are not primarily in the CTA business.
A key feature is the cross-reference to the Investment Company Act: the bill ties eligibility for the exemption to established exclusions (3(c)(10) and 3(c)(14)), so whether an entity qualifies depends on both commodity-law and investment-company-law status. The text preserves the CFTC’s ability to bring proceedings under section 14 against persons relying on the exemptions and explicitly states that nothing in the amendment relieves anyone of duties or remedies available under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.For charity managers and counsel, the practical upshot is twofold.
First, a qualifying charity and covered personnel will not have to register with the CFTC as a CTA or CPO for activity limited to covered entities, reducing registration, reporting, and certain compliance costs. Second, the charity must still consider securities-law disclosure and reporting obligations—including a specific requirement to provide disclosure in accordance with section 7(e) of the Investment Company Act for certain excluded entities—so some transparency responsibilities remain.
That combination creates a hybrid compliance picture: less CFTC process, but continued SEC-facing duties and exposure to CFTC enforcement if the organization’s activities step outside the statutory limits.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill amends 7 U.S.C. 6m to exempt charities (per Investment Company Act section 3(c)(10)(D)) and trustees, officers, employees, or volunteers acting within scope from the CFTC’s registration prohibition for CTAs and CPOs when activities are conducted only on behalf of qualifying charities or specified excluded investment vehicles.
It extends the exemption to entities and accounts described in section 3(c)(14) of the Investment Company Act, and to investment trusts, syndicates, or similar enterprises excluded under 3(c)(10) and their trustees, administrators, settlors, or beneficiaries, where work is only for those excluded entities.
A small-adviser safe harbor applies: CTAs that have advised 15 or fewer persons in the prior 12 months and do not hold themselves out generally as CTAs are not subject to the registration prohibition.
The bill preserves an SEC-registered-adviser exception: a registered investment adviser whose business does not consist primarily of being a CTA and who does not advise pools primarily engaged in trading commodity interests is exempt from the CFTC requirement.
The amendment keeps securities-law obligations intact, requires certain charities to provide disclosure consistent with Investment Company Act section 7(e), and makes persons relying on these exceptions subject to CFTC section 14 proceedings.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Designates the Act as the 'CFTC Charitable Organization Exemption Act of 2025.' This is a formal label only; it creates no substantive rights or obligations.
Baseline prohibition retained
Maintains the existing core prohibition that unregistered commodity trading advisors and commodity pool operators may not use the mails or interstate commerce in connection with their business. Practically, this preserves the CFTC’s default registration trigger and keeps the statute’s prior structure that the following exceptions narrow.
New charitable organization exemption
Creates the central substantive change: a CTA or CPO 'shall not apply' to the prohibition when the person is a charitable organization as defined by Investment Company Act section 3(c)(10)(D), or covered personnel acting within scope, and when activities are conducted only on behalf of qualifying charities or certain investment vehicles excluded under 3(c)(10). This clause is the operational core: it ties exemption eligibility to the Investment Company Act status of the entity benefiting from the advisory or pool activity, not simply to the nonprofit status of the operator.
Inclusion of 3(c)(14) plans and related persons
Extends the exemption to plans, companies, or accounts described in 3(c)(14) and to persons who establish or maintain such plans, plus trustees and volunteers for these entities acting within scope. By naming 3(c)(14) instruments, the bill reaches certain employee-benefit-plan-related vehicles, which broadens the exemption beyond traditional charity endowments to some plan-sponsored arrangements.
Small-adviser safe harbor and SEC-registered-adviser carve-out
Codifies a small-CTA safe harbor for advisers who served 15 or fewer clients in the prior 12 months and do not generally hold themselves out as CTAs. It also exempts SEC-registered investment advisers whose business is not primarily CTA activity and who do not advise commodity-intensive pools; the bill defines 'engaged primarily' and enumerates 'commodity interests' to avoid later interpretive dispute.
Relationship with securities law preserved
Explicitly states that the amendment does not relieve any person of obligations or remedies under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act of 1934 regarding the issuance, offer, purchase, or sale of securities of a commodity pool or reporting by a commodity pool. This preserves SEC authority and private rights of action even when the CFTC exemption applies.
Disclosure requirement for certain exempt charities
Requires organizations relying on the subsection (b)(2)(A) exemption with respect to investment trusts or syndicates excluded under 3(c)(10)(B) to provide disclosure in accordance with section 7(e) of the Investment Company Act. This inserts a specific disclosure obligation into the CFTC amendment and links transparency obligations back to the Investment Company Act framework.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Charitable organizations that sponsor or operate pools or invest endowment funds in commodity interests—because they can avoid CFTC registration and the associated reporting and compliance procedures when their activity stays within the statutory limits.
- Trustees, directors, officers, employees, and volunteers of qualifying charities—because the text explicitly covers these persons when acting within the scope of their duties, reducing the risk they individually trigger CTA/CPO registration obligations.
- Small advisers and SEC-registered investment advisers—because the bill confirms existing-style safe harbors and exempts SEC-registered advisers that are not primarily CTAs, lowering duplicate regulatory compliance for advisers serving nonprofit clients.
- Nonprofit-affiliated investment vehicles excluded under Investment Company Act sections 3(c)(10) and 3(c)(14)—because the statute permits advisory or pool activities targeted solely to those excluded vehicles without triggering CFTC registration.
Who Bears the Cost
- The CFTC—because the agency loses automatic registration-based visibility into some charitable commodity trading activity and must rely more on targeted investigations, section 14 proceedings, or coordination with the SEC to detect and police misconduct.
- Counterparties and service providers (prime brokers, exchanges) transacting with nonprofit pools—because reduced CFTC oversight could increase due-diligence burdens and legal uncertainty about counterparty protections and dispute remedies.
- Beneficiaries and donors of certain charitable investment vehicles—because they may face less regulatory transparency and fewer CFTC-mandated disclosures, potentially raising risks around asset management practices and conflicts of interest.
- Compliance and legal teams at charities—because navigating the interplay between the Commodity Exchange Act, Investment Company Act exclusions, and securities-law disclosure obligations will require interpretive work and potential litigation risk when the limits of the exemption are tested.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether reducing CFTC registration and transactional friction for charities—thereby lowering costs and enabling charitable investment activity—justifies the corresponding reduction in ex ante regulatory visibility and routine oversight; the statute eases nonprofit operations but risks creating transparency and enforcement gaps that could harm donors, beneficiaries, and market counterparties.
The bill solves a clear compliance pain point for nonprofits by removing automatic CTA/CPO registration triggers, but it does so by folding the exemption into the Investment Company Act’s complex exclusion framework rather than creating a standalone, charity-specific test. That linkage creates several implementation challenges.
First, charities must determine whether the investment vehicle they serve actually qualifies under 3(c)(10) or 3(c)(14); those determinations often require fact-intensive legal analysis and can change with fundraising or structuring decisions. Second, the exemption applies only where activities are conducted 'only on behalf of' qualifying entities—an operationally blunt standard that will force charities to segregate clients, accounts, and communications tightly or risk losing the exemption.
Enforcement and oversight also shift in ambiguous ways. The bill retains CFTC section 14 proceedings as a check, but relying on post hoc enforcement is a weaker transparency regime than registration and routine reporting.
Meanwhile, the statute preserves SEC obligations and imposes an Investment Company Act disclosure hook, but it leaves open which agency will take the lead when conduct straddles commodities and securities. That split can produce gaps in supervision, duplicate examinations, or forum-shopping by private plaintiffs.
Finally, the small-adviser threshold (15 persons) and the 'engaged primarily' language for SEC-registered advisers will generate borderline cases and litigation over what counts as holding oneself out publicly or being primarily engaged in commodity interests.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.