Codify — Article

Black Lung Benefits Improvement Act of 2025: reforms to claims processing

A broad federal reform to speed adjudication, expand medical evidence, and strengthen the funding and governance of miners’ benefits.

The Brief

HB6756, the Black Lung Benefits Improvement Act of 2025, overhauls how claims under the Black Lung Benefits Act are filed, developed, and paid. It expands claimant assistance, requires a comprehensive pulmonary evaluation process, tightens anti-fraud provisions, and creates a governance and funding framework intended to improve solvency and predictability for miners and their families.

The bill reorganizes the program’s administration by establishing the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs within the Department of Labor, authorizing a complete pulmonary evaluation, and creating an Attorneys’ Fees and Medical Expenses Payment Program to help claimants obtain legal and medical support. It also expands survivor and dependent benefits, requires disclosure of earnings information for claims, and sets new performance targets to reduce delays in adjudication.

At a Glance

What It Does

Provides expanded claims assistance; creates a complete pulmonary evaluation process; broadens medical evidence development; enhances enforcement against misrepresentation; and strengthens funding and governance for the Black Lung Benefits program.

Who It Affects

Directly affects miners, survivors, and dependents; claims professionals and attorneys; medical providers on the evaluation list; coal mine operators (including self-insurers); and the Department of Labor’s Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs.

Why It Matters

This bill aims to reduce backlogs, improve accuracy in awards, ensure access to credible medical evidence, and bolster the financial security of the fund that pays benefits to miners and their families.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The Black Lung Benefits Improvement Act of 2025 proposes a comprehensive upgrade to the Black Lung Benefits Act. It begins by expanding the support available to claimants and their dependents when pursuing benefits, clarifying eligibility, and ensuring correct identification of who qualifies for payments.

A central feature is Section 435, which adds a complete pulmonary evaluation to be performed for claims, including the option to use a list of qualified physicians subject to annual suitability checks and conflict-of-interest safeguards.

The bill also tightens oversight and enforcement around false statements or misrepresentations, and creates a process for readjudicating certain chest radiograph claims in a way that recognizes updated interpretations while safeguarding against retroactive reversal of prior decisions. A new Attorneys’ Fees and Medical Expenses Payment Program would reimburse qualifying attorneys and medical expenses up to set caps, funded by the Black Lung Benefits Fund, to improve access to representation and medical evidence.On the funding side, the measure strengthens the financial security of the Black Lung Benefits Disability Trust Fund.

It establishes clearer rules for self-insurers, adjusts penalties for noncompliance, and creates a dedicated Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs to unify management and oversight. Finally, it requires data sharing (earnings information) to administer benefits more accurately and establishes a strategy to reduce adjudication delays.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

Sec. 101 expands claimants’ access to claim assistance for miners and dependents.

2

Sec. 102 creates an irrebuttable presumption of total disability when certain imaging results are present.

3

Sec. 103 introduces a complete pulmonary evaluation with a qualified physician list and conflict-of-interest protections.

4

Sec. 106 establishes an Attorneys’ Fees and Medical Expenses Payment Program with caps and fund backing.

5

Sec. 131 strengthens funding security for the fund, increases self-insurer accountability, and expands remedies for noncompliance.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Part A

Improving the process for filing and adjudicating claims

Sec. 101 expands the definition of who assists with claims to include the analysis, examination, and treatment of respiratory impairments and to provide assistance for miners, spouses, dependents, and other family members. Sec. 102 adds a presumption that a miner is totally disabled if certain tests show complicated pneumoconiosis or progressive massive fibrosis, creating a faster pathway to benefits. Sec. 103 adds a new complete pulmonary evaluation process to develop medical evidence, including a list of qualified physicians and procedures to ensure independence and credibility. Sec. 104 strengthens penalties for false statements and establishes attorney disqualification and discovery sanctions to deter fraud or abuse.

Part A

Readjudication and evidence standards

Sec. 105 introduces readjudication of cases involving certain chest radiographs deemed by the Secretary to be unreliable on prior interpretations, with rules on timing and benefit payment starting points. This section addresses disputes over radiographic interpretations while preserving due process. Sec. 106 creates an Attorneys’ Fees and Medical Expenses Payment Program to reimburse reasonable costs incurred in pursuing a claim, subject to caps and funded by the Trust Fund, intended to lower barriers to legal and medical representation.

Part A

Eligibility, cost-of-living, and claims integrity

Sec. 102 and Sec. 107 work together to adjust eligibility standards and restore adequate benefit adjustments over time, aligning benefit levels with inflation and CPI indices. Sec. 108 expands cross-agency data sharing to include earnings information from the Social Security Administration to properly administer claims under the Black Lung Benefits Act.

4 more sections
Part B

Reports to improve administration

Sec. 121 requires a comprehensive strategy within 90 days to reduce backlogs before the Office of Administrative Law Judges, detailing current and target pendency, resource needs, and efficiency measures such as video conferencing and staffing reforms to speed resolution of claims.

Part C

Financial security of the Black Lung Benefits Disability Trust Fund

Sec. 131 sets out interim and final rules for self-insurance and security deposits, expands the definition of ‘other responsible party,’ and increases penalties for failure to secure payments (e.g., $25,000). It also broadens the pool of liable parties and requires annual assessments of financial health to ensure ongoing solvency for benefit payments.

Title II

Establishing the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs

Sec. 201 establishes the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs within the Department of Labor and names a Senate-confirmed Director who will inherit the pre-existing functions of the prior office, ensuring continuity while creating a dedicated lead for program oversight and governance.

Title III

Additional provisions and amendments

Sec. 301 makes technical and conforming amendments across the Black Lung Benefits Act to reflect the reorganization and policy changes; Sec. 302 provides severability to ensure that if any provision is struck down, the rest remain in effect.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.

Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Miners and their surviving dependents who gain clearer eligibility, faster adjudication, and improved access to medical evidence and legal representation.
  • Claimants' attorneys who benefit from the new cost-reimbursement program and more transparent process.
  • Physicians on the new qualified-physician list who provide complete pulmonary evaluations and credible opinions.
  • The Department of Labor and the newly established Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, which gains a consolidated authority over benefits administration.
  • The Black Lung Benefits Disability Trust Fund, through improved solvency and governance structures.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Coal mine operators and self-insurers who must meet stricter funding and security requirements and may face higher penalties for noncompliance.
  • The private sector through fund-based costs to finance the new program elements (e.g., physician costs, fee program subsidies).
  • The broader system may bear transitional costs associated with implementing new evaluation procedures and data-sharing requirements.
  • Attorneys and medical providers who participate in the new fee program may see changes in reimbursement practices and schedules.
  • Public agencies and the private sector may incur costs to implement enhanced anti-fraud provisions and conflict-of-interest protections.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The core dilemma is how to speed and democratize access to Black Lung benefits while preserving the integrity of medical evidence and ensuring the program’s long-term solvency. Clearing the claims backlog and guaranteeing payment must not come at the expense of accurate diagnoses, credible medical evaluations, or adequate funding.

The bill introduces several intertwined reforms that will require careful implementation. Expanding access to claimant assistance and mandating a complete pulmonary evaluation increases upfront demand on medical and administrative resources, even as the fund’s solvency is tightened with new self-insurance rules and penalties.

The data-sharing provisions (income and earnings information) raise privacy and governance questions about the scope and duration of disclosures, requiring robust handling and limited purposes to protect claimants’ privacy while enabling accurate adjudication. The readjudication of radiographs, while addressing credibility concerns about past interpretations, may necessitate transition rules to avoid retroactive impact on previously decided claims.

The central policy tension lies in balancing rapid, fair access to benefits with rigorous medical evidence and financial safeguards. While a stronger enforcement regime reduces fraud risk, it could also increase the burden on claimants who rely on timely decisions.

The new office and reorganization promise more consistent administration, but require careful resourcing to avoid new bottlenecks during the transition.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.