The bill amends 18 U.S.C. §659 to add a new paragraph making it a federal offense to embezzle, steal, unlawfully take or obtain by fraud any package or article that has been delivered by a private or commercial interstate carrier before the addressee or the addressee’s agent takes physical possession. It explicitly places those carrier-delivered items on the same footing as matter carried in interstate or foreign commerce under current federal law.
This matters because it closes a gap between protections for U.S. Mail and protections for packages moved by private carriers, creating a federal enforcement path for so-called "porch piracy" where an interstate element exists. Carriers, e-commerce sellers, insurers, and prosecutors will need to assess evidence standards, delivery practices, and how federal prosecution interacts with state theft laws and civil recoveries.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill inserts a new paragraph into 18 U.S.C. §659 to cover packages delivered by private or commercial interstate carriers and criminalizes taking those packages before the addressee or an agent has taken physical possession. The covered acts include embezzling, stealing, unlawfully taking, carrying away, or obtaining by fraud or deception.
Who It Affects
Private and commercial interstate carriers (e.g., national delivery services and interstate courier operations), e-commerce merchants and marketplaces that ship goods across state lines, insurers that cover lost or stolen shipments, and prosecutors (federal and state) who handle theft cases. Recipients of interstate shipments are also affected by changes in enforcement incentives and potential carrier policies.
Why It Matters
By federalizing theft of certain carrier-delivered packages, the bill narrows a long-standing protection gap between Postal Service matter and private carrier shipments, potentially redirecting some cases to federal authorities and prompting operational and contractual changes by carriers and sellers to manage risk.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Porch Pirates Act amends the federal theft statute found at 18 U.S.C. §659 by adding a targeted provision that reaches packages or other articles that private or commercial interstate carriers have delivered for collection but for which the recipient has not yet taken physical possession. The statute lists the same modes of wrongful acquisition that already appear in §659 for other covered matter — embezzlement, theft, unlawful taking, carrying away, or obtaining by fraud — and places carrier-delivered items within the statute’s scope.
Practically, the bill creates a federal option for prosecuting thefts where the interstate carrier element can be shown. The operative timing is narrow: the protected window is the period after the carrier has delivered the item for collection and before the addressee (or the addressee’s agent) has physical possession.
That timing will matter in many common scenarios: packages left on porches, curbside pickups awaiting collection, or consignment withheld at carrier facilities pending pickup.The bill also includes a short 'sense of Congress' clause asserting congressional authority to extend federal protections to these deliveries; that language is a preemptive signaling device, relevant if questions arise about Commerce Clause coverage or federal reach into traditional state theft prosecutions. The statutory amendment is mechanically simple — it inserts a new paragraph into §659 — but it has cascading operational effects: evidence requirements for federal proof of an interstate carrier or interstate movement, coordination between local police and federal prosecutors, and likely changes to carrier delivery practices or commercial terms to allocate loss risk.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds a new paragraph to 18 U.S.C. §659 specifically covering packages "delivered by any private or commercial interstate carrier" before the addressee or an agent takes physical possession.
The protected conduct is defined by a list of verbs: embezzles, steals, unlawfully takes, carries away, or obtains by fraud or deception.
The statutory window of liability is explicitly 'before the addressee or his or her agent has taken physical possession,' making the timing of delivery and possession dispositive.
The bill includes a 'sense of Congress' statement affirming Congress’s authority to extend federal protections to carrier-delivered items, a signal relevant to constitutional or jurisdictional challenges.
Coverage depends on a private or commercial interstate carrier connection; the text ties the federal offense to an interstate carrier predicate rather than all local deliveries.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title — "Porch Pirates Act of 2025"
This is the bill’s formal short-title clause. It serves no substantive legal function but frames the measure’s policy purpose for readers and stakeholders.
Sense of Congress on Authority
This section states Congress’s view that it has authority to extend federal protections to items left for collection by private or commercial interstate carriers. While nonbinding, the clause is often used to preempt procedural or constitutional arguments and to indicate legislative intent that may be referenced in litigation challenging the statute’s scope.
Amendment to 18 U.S.C. §659 — New Paragraph for Carrier-Delivered Items
Section 3 makes the operative change: it alters the punctuation at the end of the fourth paragraph of §659 and inserts a new paragraph criminalizing the wrongful taking of any package or article delivered by a private or commercial interstate carrier before the addressee or agent has taken physical possession. The practical implication is to place these carrier-delivered items under the same federal protection umbrella that applies to other matter in interstate or foreign commerce under §659, thereby creating a federal offense where an interstate carrier predicate exists.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Criminal Justice across all five countries.
Explore Criminal Justice in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Recipients of interstate shipments — Gains a new federal enforcement avenue and potential deterrent against porch theft when the interstate-carrier element is provable.
- National private carriers and logistics platforms — Benefit from clearer federal protection for items in interstate movement, which can reduce loss rates and support contractual allocation of risk with shippers and recipients.
- E-commerce retailers and marketplaces — May see fewer loss incidents and clearer legal remedies against third-party thieves when interstate shipping is involved; this could reduce customer disputes and chargebacks.
- Federal prosecutors and investigators — Obtain a statutory tool to pursue thefts tied to interstate commerce, which can be useful for multi-jurisdictional theft rings that exploit state-by-state enforcement gaps.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal prosecutors and the Department of Justice — Face additional caseload considerations and must decide enforcement priorities between local thefts and other federal crimes.
- Local police and prosecutors — Must coordinate with federal authorities; some cases may be removed from state courts, complicating local prosecutorial strategies and victim restitution paths.
- Private carriers and last-mile operators — May incur operational changes (e.g., authentication, signature requirements, altered drop-off procedures) or litigation costs if civil claims arise under the new federal standard.
- Insurers and claims administrators — Could face altered claim flows and evidentiary disputes about when possession occurred and whether an interstate carrier predicate is satisfied, affecting coverage determinations and premiums.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between the public interest in deterring and more uniformly prosecuting thefts of interstate shipments, and the risks of expanding federal criminal law into routine local property crimes: the change promises greater protection for victims and carriers where an interstate nexus exists, but it also creates definitional ambiguity, new evidentiary burdens, and incentives for operational changes that shift costs to carriers and consumers without guaranteeing federal enforcement coverage.
The bill is compact but raises several implementation and doctrinal questions. First, the phrase "private or commercial interstate carrier" is not defined in the amendment; courts and prosecutors will need to determine whether a given courier, a gig-economy delivery driver, or a local route with interlined shipments meets the interstate predicate.
That matters because federal jurisdiction and the statute’s applicability turn on the interstate carrier connection.
Second, the statute hinges on the timing clause "before the addressee or his or her agent has taken physical possession," which shifts many disputes into factual contests over when possession occurred. Proof problems — establishing delivery, the carrier’s status as interstate, and the timing of the thief’s act relative to possession — could limit federal prosecutions to clear-cut cases.
The insertion of a 'sense of Congress' statement attempts to foreclose Commerce Clause challenges, but that clause itself carries no substantive definitional help.
Finally, the bill may incentivize carriers and sellers to change delivery terms (for example, requiring signatures or limiting unattended deliveries) to reduce exposure. Those operational shifts will have distributional consequences: higher service costs for consumers, different risk allocation in commercial contracts, and new friction in last-mile logistics.
Prosecutors will also face prioritization choices — federalizing an offense does not guarantee federal resources will follow — so the deterrent effect depends on enforcement practice and intergovernmental coordination.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.