The Fair Trade Act of 2026 imposes additional duties on goods imported into the United States, effective for each calendar year after enactment. The act requires a 10 percent ad valorem duty on goods imported from countries with which the United States has a trade surplus, and a 15 percent ad valorem duty on goods from countries with which the United States has a trade deficit.
These duties are in addition to any existing duties under law.
The president may reduce these duties if such a reduction serves the national interest or national security, but only after consulting the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee to determine whether the action is appropriate. The bill sets no exemptions or transitional rules beyond these provisions, and it relies on standard trade data to determine a country’s surplus or deficit status with the United States.
At a Glance
What It Does
For each calendar year after enactment, the act imposes a 10% ad valorem duty on goods from countries with which the U.S. has a trade surplus and a 15% ad valorem duty on goods from countries with which the U.S. has a trade deficit. These duties stack on top of any existing duties.
Who It Affects
Directly affects U.S. importers, customs brokers, and domestic industries that purchase foreign goods, as well as foreign suppliers from surplus and deficit countries.
Why It Matters
Creates a balance-based tariff tool that could alter prices, sourcing decisions, and bilateral relations, while granting the executive branch discretionary reduction authority subject to congressional consultation.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill introduces a new tariff framework tied to bilateral trade balances. If enacted, each calendar year would see two tiers of duties: 10% for goods from countries that have a trade surplus with the United States, and 15% for goods from countries that run a trade deficit with the United States.
These duties would be added on top of any existing tariffs. In effect, the United States would tax imports more aggressively from some countries and, to a greater degree, from others, depending on trade balances.
The act also gives the President flexibility to reduce these duties if doing so serves national interest or national security. However, before exercising that authority, the President must consult with the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee to determine whether the reduction is appropriate.
The bill does not include explicit exemptions or sunset provisions, and it relies on standard measures of bilateral trade balance to classify countries for the higher or lower tariff rate.If enacted, the measure would interact with existing tariff regimes and could influence sourcing choices, manufacturing costs, and consumer prices. It would also raise questions about how the United States defines and measures trade balance with individual countries and how trading partners might respond.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill imposes a 10 percent ad valorem duty on goods from countries with which the U.S. has a trade surplus.
The bill imposes a 15 percent ad valorem duty on goods from countries with which the U.S. has a trade deficit.
These duties are in addition to any existing duties under current law.
The President can reduce the duties if national interest or national security requires it, subject to a formal consultation requirement.
Congressional consultation must occur with the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee before any reduction is implemented.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
This section provides the act’s formal citation as the Fair Trade Act of 2026. It sets the name used in all official references and in implementing regulations.
Imposition of balance-based duties
For each calendar year after enactment, the act imposes a 10% ad valorem duty on goods imported from countries with which the United States has a trade surplus, and a 15% ad valorem duty on goods imported from countries with which the United States has a trade deficit. These rates apply to the full value of the goods and stack on top of any other duties imposed by law.
Relation to existing duties
The new duties imposed under subsection (a) are in addition to, and not in substitution for, any other duties currently imposed on the good. Importers would face the combined effect of existing tariffs plus these new balance-based duties.
Reduction of duties; consultation
The President may reduce the percentage required under subsection (a) to an amount greater than zero if the reduction serves the national interest or national security. Before exercising this authority, the President must consult with the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee to determine whether the reduction is appropriate.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Trade across all five countries.
Explore Trade in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- U.S. manufacturers in sectors facing import competition (for example, automotive, electronics, machinery) gain protection from foreign competition and potential market share retention.
- U.S. workers employed in domestic manufacturing sectors may benefit through job protection or growth in domestic production.
- U.S. Treasury could receive additional tariff revenue from the new duties, offsetting some import-related costs.
- Policy analysts and government agencies focused on trade balance and industrial policy may view the measure as a tool to influence bilateral trade dynamics.
Who Bears the Cost
- Importers and distributors facing higher landed costs and more complex compliance due to tariff stacking.
- Consumers paying higher prices for imported goods or goods with significant imported inputs.
- Small businesses relying on imported components or just-in-time supply chains may experience cost pressures and disrupted sourcing.
- U.S. exporters could face higher global competition or retaliation if trading partners respond with reciprocal tariffs.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether balance-based tariffs should be used as a tool to protect domestic industries and address perceived industrial imbalances, while risking higher consumer prices, supply-chain disruption, and potential retaliation from trading partners.
The act creates a national tariff framework tied to bilateral trade balances, but it leaves several implementation questions unresolved. Determining which countries are in surplus or deficit with the United States would rely on standard trade data, but the bill does not specify data sources or the time window for balance calculations.
There is no explicit exemption or safeguard for essential goods, nor a sunset provision that would end the tariffs without further action. The introduction of discretion for rate reductions introduces a policy lever that could be used tactically, potentially influencing negotiation dynamics and international relationships.
Implementing the new duties would also interact with existing tariff schedules and rules of origin in ways the bill does not detail, raising questions about administration, enforcement, and compliance costs for importers and federal agencies.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.