The Data Driven Diplomacy Act would create a formal channel for internal collaboration within the Department of State by linking the Office of Opinion Research (Bureau of Intelligence and Research) with the Bureau of Global Public Affairs. It directs the GPA to engage INR’s Office of Opinion Research to conduct public opinion surveys aimed at informing GPA’s cultural context understanding, audience targeting, and shifting attitudes toward the United States and U.S. interests in regions where U.S.-funded media outlets operate or could operate in the future.
The bill is narrowly scoped to internal public diplomacy coordination and survey-backed messaging, with no new regulatory or funding mechanisms specified in the text provided. The result would be more data-informed planning for public diplomacy activities and messaging strategy.
At a Glance
What It Does
Directs GPA to work with INR’s Office of Opinion Research to conduct surveys that illuminate cultural context, audience segmentation, and attitudes toward the U.S. in regions with U.S.-funded media presence or potential presence.
Who It Affects
The Office of Opinion Research, INR; the Bureau of Global Public Affairs; regional/state department bureaus and staff responsible for public diplomacy and outreach.
Why It Matters
Grounds public diplomacy in empirical insights, enabling more culturally aware messaging and targeted outreach in key regions where media influence is present or likely to grow.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates a formal mechanism for DoS to rely on public opinion research to shape its public diplomacy. The GPA would coordinate with INR’s Office of Opinion Research to commission surveys that measure cultural context, audience groups, and how people in certain regions view the United States and U.S. interests, particularly in places where U.S.-funded media operates or may operate in the future.
Those data would then inform GPA’s outreach and messaging strategies. By tying messaging to directly collected attitudes, the State Department would be able to tailor its diplomacy efforts more precisely to regional realities.
The act concentrates on internal DoS coordination and the use of social science methods to improve communication with international audiences, rather than creating new programs or funding streams. The expected effect is a more data-driven approach to public diplomacy within the existing departmental framework.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Section 2 requires GPA to request INR’s Office of Opinion Research to conduct public opinion surveys.
Surveys must inform GPA on cultural context, target audiences, and shifting attitudes toward the U.S. in regions with U.S.-funded media presence or potential presence.
The coordination is internal to the Department of State, linking INR research with GPA’s messaging efforts.
The bill is named the Data Driven Diplomacy Act and is introduced in the 119th Congress as H.R. 7036.
No new appropriation or external program is specified in the text provided.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title and Citation
Section 1 establishes the bill’s short title as the Data Driven Diplomacy Act. This section provides the formal citation for the act once enacted, setting the naming convention for future references.
Coordination with Office of Opinion Research
Section 2 requires the Assistant Secretary for Global Public Affairs to request the Office of Opinion Research in the Bureau of Intelligence and Research to conduct public opinion surveys. These surveys are intended to inform GPA on cultural context, target audiences, and shifting attitudes toward the United States and U.S. interests in regions where U.S.-funded media outlets operate or could operate in the future. The section establishes an internal DoS mechanism for data-informed public diplomacy, without specifying budget, reporting, or implementation details.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Foreign Affairs across all five countries.
Explore Foreign Affairs in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- INR’s Office of Opinion Research gains a documented mandate to contribute directly to public diplomacy planning.
- Bureau of Global Public Affairs (GPA) gains access to empirical, region-specific audience insights to tailor messaging and outreach.
- State Department regional bureaus and country desks receive culturally contextual data to shape outreach strategies and public messaging.
- Public diplomacy officers and foreign service staff can align campaigns with measured attitudes and cultural nuances.
Who Bears the Cost
- INR resources (staff time, survey design, data collection and analysis) are stretched to accommodate the new coordination.
- GPA resources and workflows may need adjustments to integrate survey insights into ongoing messaging programs.
- Department-wide administrative overhead from cross-bureau coordination.
- Regional bureaus may incur costs to adapt programs and outreach based on survey findings.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Whether formalizing this internal data-sharing and survey-driven approach will meaningfully improve diplomacy without constraining broader strategic judgment or creating overreliance on public opinion data.
The act creates a clear mechanism for data-driven public diplomacy but relies on the assumption that public opinion data can accurately inform outreach without becoming the sole driver of policy messaging. Implementing the surveys and integrating their findings will require sufficient staffing, analytic capability, and cross-bureau alignment, which could divest attention from other diplomatic priorities if not managed well.
Privacy, consent, and data stewardship considerations are not detailed in the bill text provided, leaving questions about how data would be collected, stored, and shared within the department.
A central tension is balancing the value of granular audience insight with the risk of overfitting messaging to current attitudes, which can shift rapidly and may not reflect long-term policy preferences. The bill’s scope is internal and limited to DoS coordination, so broader interagency or congressional oversight would be outside its current language, which could affect accountability and evaluation of outcomes.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.