The Protecting Girls with Turner Syndrome Act of 2026 adds a new federal provision to prohibit abortion discrimination based on Turner syndrome and to create a set of enforcement tools. It defines key terms, outlines what constitutes discrimination, and establishes criminal penalties, civil remedies, and reporting requirements for medical professionals.
The bill also introduces privacy protections for patients in court proceedings and directs expedited handling of cases under the new provision. If enacted, it would provide a federal framework to challenge abortions performed or attempted because of Turner syndrome and to compensate affected individuals and families.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill adds a new 18 U.S.C. § 250 prohibiting abortion discrimination on the basis of Turner syndrome, with definitions for abortion, Turner syndrome, qualified plaintiffs, and unborn child. It makes certain acts illegal, establishes criminal penalties, civil remedies, and reporting requirements, and creates privacy protections for involved plaintiffs.
Who It Affects
Directly affects abortion providers, pregnant individuals facing Turner syndrome considerations, family members of affected unborn children, and federal courts that would hear civil and criminal actions. Medical professionals face mandatory reporting obligations and privacy orders in proceedings.
Why It Matters
It creates a specific federal prohibition against Turner syndrome–based abortion discrimination, enabling targeted civil actions and penalties. The law signals a distinct federal stance on discrimination in abortion decisions and adds enforceable remedies and privacy measures for patients and families.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill would add a new provision to title 18 that makes it illegal to perform or attempt an abortion if the decision is based on Turner syndrome for a fetus. It defines key terms, including what counts as an abortion, what Turner syndrome means, who can sue (a pregnant woman, certain relatives, or the Attorney General), and who is protected as an unborn child.
If someone violates the prohibition, the bill creates criminal penalties and allows civil lawsuits seeking damages, punitive damages, and injunctions. The bill also sets out the rights of a woman who has had an abortion to sue, while establishing exceptions in some scenarios and protecting the woman from prosecution for laws violations tied to the abortion itself.
There are reporting requirements for clinicians, and privacy protections to safeguard the identity of patients in court proceedings, including orders and the use of pseudonyms where appropriate. Finally, it includes a severability clause and a clerical addition to the table of sections to accommodate the new statute.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds a new federal offense under 18 U.S.C. § 250 against abortions performed or attempted on Turner syndrome grounds.
Definitions cover abortion, Turner syndrome, qualified plaintiffs, and unborn child for the purposes of this section.
Criminal penalties include fines and up to five years of imprisonment for violations.
Civil remedies allow the pregnant woman, certain relatives, or the Attorney General to sue for damages, punitive damages, and injunctive relief, with attorney’s fees to prevailing plaintiffs.
Clinicians must report violations, and courts must protect patient privacy through anonymity orders and the use of pseudonyms.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
This section designates the act as the Protecting Girls with Turner Syndrome Act of 2026, establishing the name by which the bill will be cited in law and reference materials. It signals the policy objective at a high level and sets the stage for the detailed prohibitions and remedies that follow.
Turner syndrome abortion discrimination prohibition
This is the core substantive section. It adds a new statute defining abortion, Turner syndrome, qualified plaintiffs, and unborn child, and it makes it unlawful to perform an abortion with knowledge that Turner syndrome is a factor or to proceed without asking about test results or prenatal diagnoses and informing the pregnant woman of the prohibitions if Turner syndrome is known or suspected. The section also enumerates prohibited conduct such as coercion, funding, and transportation aimed at facilitating prohibited abortions, and it prescribes criminal penalties, civil remedies, and reporting requirements for medical professionals.
Severability
This clause provides that if any portion of the act or its amendments is held invalid, the remainder still applies to the extent it can be given effect. It preserves the enforceable parts of the statute even if one provision is struck down.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Civil Rights across all five countries.
Explore Civil Rights in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Pregnant women who face Turner syndrome considerations gain a clear federal standard against discriminatory abortions and a pathway to redress if violations occur.
- Fathers and maternal grandparents (where applicable) are recognized as potential plaintiffs, providing standing to seek relief when a violation affects their familial interests.
- Disability rights organizations and Turner syndrome advocacy groups obtain a framework to advocate for protections against discrimination in abortion decisions.
- The Attorney General gains a clear enforcement mechanism to pursue violations on behalf of the public interest.
- Medical and mental health professionals obtain defined reporting duties and privacy protections that guide clinical practice.
Who Bears the Cost
- Abortion providers and clinics face new compliance obligations, including verifying Turner syndrome information, informing patients, and maintaining privacy protections.
- Hospitals and insurers may encounter civil liability and increased administrative overhead related to compliance and potential lawsuits.
- Public funds and recipients of federal programs may see implications under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 if discrimination occurs, with potential impacts on funding.
- Legal practitioners and the judiciary may experience increased caseloads related to civil actions, damages, injunctions, and privacy-related proceedings.
- Federal and state agencies responsible for enforcement, reporting, and privacy protections must allocate resources to implement and monitor compliance.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing strong protection against discrimination in abortion decisions with respect for patient privacy, clinical autonomy, and the potential for overreach or chilling effects in medical practice.
The bill creates a precise federal standard that targets abortions conducted on Turner syndrome grounds, but it raises important implementation questions. It relies on clinicians to assess Turner syndrome information and to inform patients about prohibitions, which could influence standard medical counseling practices.
The civil remedies and penalties introduce a liability landscape that will shape how providers approach counseling, testing, and patient decisions. Privacy protections, including anonymity and pseudonymity, may complicate evidentiary issues and limit public disclosure, potentially affecting the collectability of evidence in some cases.
Additionally, the interplay with existing abortion laws and state rules could produce a patchwork of enforcement challenges. Finally, the scope of qualified plaintiffs and the role of the Attorney General in civil actions may raise questions about prosecutorial and judicial resources.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.