Codify — Article

More Behavioral Health Providers Act expands Medicare HPSA bonus to mental health and SUD clinicians

Adds a 15% Medicare payment bonus for defined behavioral health services in mental health professional shortage areas and extends eligibility to several non-physician practitioners.

The Brief

The bill amends section 1833(m) of the Social Security Act to create a new, higher Medicare bonus for mental health and substance use disorder (SUD) services furnished in areas the Secretary identifies as mental health professional shortage areas. It keeps the existing 10% HPSA bonus for physician services in general HPSAs but establishes a 15% bonus for “specified health services” delivered in the newly scoped mental health shortage areas and explicitly extends bonus eligibility to a list of non-physician practitioners.

Practically, the law would direct Medicare Part B bonus payments (paid monthly or quarterly from the Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund) to qualified clinicians or, in specified cases, to their employers or facilities. The change aims to redirect financial incentives to increase behavioral health capacity in underserved areas, but it also raises questions about program cost, how shortage areas will be identified administratively, and how CMS will define and verify the covered mental health and SUD services.

At a Glance

What It Does

The bill revises 1833(m) to add a new subparagraph that pays a 15% bonus (of the Medicare payment amount) for covered mental health and SUD services furnished in areas the Secretary designates as mental health professional shortage areas. It preserves the existing 10% bonus for physician services in general HPSAs and allows payments to flow to clinicians or qualifying employers/facilities on a monthly or quarterly basis.

Who It Affects

Medicare Part B clinicians who furnish mental health or SUD treatment in designated mental health shortage areas—specifically physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, clinical social workers, clinical psychologists, marriage and family therapists, and mental health counselors—as well as the employers and facilities that bill for or employ those clinicians.

Why It Matters

This creates a targeted payment incentive focused on behavioral health rather than general primary-care HPSAs, potentially shifting provider distribution and billing patterns. It requires CMS to operationalize a mental health shortage-area designation and to define which diagnoses and services qualify, both of which will drive program impact and cost.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill changes Medicare’s existing HPSA bonus framework so behaviorally focused clinicians can receive higher payments when they deliver services in shortage-designated mental health areas. It does not create new Medicare benefits; instead, it layers an additional payment on top of services already covered by Part B when those services meet the bill’s definition of “specified health services,” and when they are furnished in areas the Secretary identifies as mental health professional shortage areas.

Mechanically, the statute splits the bonus regime into two parallel tracks. The longstanding 10% bonus for physician services in general health professional shortage areas remains in place.

The bill authorizes a separate 15% bonus for “specified health services” furnished in mental health professional shortage areas, effective for services furnished on or after January 1, 2027. “Specified health services” are those otherwise covered by Medicare that the Secretary determines are for diagnosis, evaluation or treatment of mental health disorders, or for treatment of substance use disorder (including co-occurring mental health conditions).A major practical change is the explicit expansion of eligible clinicians. The bill lists applicable practitioners—physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, clinical social workers, clinical psychologists (as defined by CMS for section 1861(ii)), marriage and family therapists, and mental health counselors—so non-physician behavioral health providers can receive the bonus.

The law also preserves the mechanism allowing payments to be made to employers or facilities in certain billing arrangements, which matters for community health centers, group practices, and integrated behavioral health settings.Implementation will require CMS rulemaking or guidance: the agency must identify which geographic areas qualify as mental health professional shortage areas under the Public Health Service Act provision the bill cites, and it must issue clinical and coding guidance defining which diagnoses and CPT/HCPCS-coded services meet the “specified health services” standard. CMS must also adapt payment systems to apply the 15% add-on and to route payments appropriately, and it will need controls to prevent improper claims or gaming of the shortage-area designation.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The 15% bonus applies only to 'specified health services' furnished on or after January 1, 2027, and is paid from the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund.

2

The bill adds an explicit, enumerated list of 'applicable practitioners' eligible for the mental-health bonus: physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, clinical social workers, clinical psychologists (as defined by CMS), marriage and family therapists, and mental health counselors.

3

The statute distinguishes two bonus streams: subparagraph (A) preserves a 10% bonus for physician services in general HPSAs; subparagraph (B) creates a separate 15% bonus for behavioral health services in mental health professional shortage areas.

4

CMS must rely on its authority under section 332(a)(1)(A) of the Public Health Service Act to identify and designate mental health professional shortage areas for purposes of the new bonus.

5

The bill allows the 15% payment to be made to the clinician or, where applicable, to the clinician’s employer or facility under the same billing exceptions that permit employer/facility receipt for the existing HPSA bonus.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 1

Short title

Designates the act as the 'More Behavioral Health Providers Act of 2026.' This is the formal naming provision and has no operational effect, but it signals the bill's focus on expanding behavioral health workforce incentives.

Section 2(a) — Amend 1833(m)(1)

Creates a distinct 15% bonus for mental health/SUD services

Replaces the existing paragraph (1) with two subparagraphs. Subparagraph (A) preserves the 10% HPSA bonus for physician services in areas designated as health professional shortage areas. Subparagraph (B) establishes a new 15% add-on for 'specified health services' furnished in areas the Secretary designates as mental health professional shortage areas. The change separates general primary-care incentives from targeted behavioral health incentives and raises the add-on percentage for the latter.

Section 2(b) — Cross-references and payment recipients

Extends payment rules and recipient options to applicable practitioners

Amends existing cross-references so that the procedural and recipient rules that govern the current HPSA bonus also apply to the new behavioral health bonus. Practically, this means the monthly or quarterly payment timing and the authority to route payments to employers or facilities (per section 1842(b)(6) clauses) carry over to the 15% bonus.

1 more section
Section 2(c) — New definitions (paragraphs (5) and (6))

Defines 'specified health services' and enumerates 'applicable practitioners'

Adds a definition for 'specified health services' — services already covered by Medicare that the Secretary determines diagnose, evaluate, or treat mental health disorders or treat substance use disorders — and sets the effective floor date as January 1, 2027. It also defines 'applicable practitioner' by listing the categories of non-physician clinicians eligible for the bonus. These statutory definitions allocate significant implementation discretion to the Secretary and will drive which services and clinicians actually receive the add-on.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.

Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Medicare beneficiaries in designated mental health shortage areas — increased financial incentives for clinicians may improve local access to mental health and SUD services where shortages exist.
  • Non-physician behavioral health clinicians (PAs, NPs, clinical social workers, psychologists, MFTs, mental health counselors) practicing in designated areas — the law allows these clinicians to receive the bonus, improving reimbursement for behavioral health care in shortage areas.
  • Community health centers, rural health clinics, and group practices that employ eligible behavioral health clinicians — firms can receive payments (where permitted), improving revenue for behavioral health staffing and potentially enabling hiring or retention.
  • State and local agencies focused on rural or underserved behavioral health — the targeted incentive creates a federal lever states can point to when designing workforce strategies or recruitment packages.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Medicare program (CMS/Part B) — the higher 15% add-on and expanded eligibility will increase Medicare spending on outpatient behavioral health services compared with the current structure.
  • CMS (administrative burden) — the agency must identify mental health shortage areas, define qualifying diagnoses and services, adjust claims systems, and issue guidance or rulemaking to operationalize the change.
  • Providers in non-designated areas — they face a relative reimbursement disadvantage that could complicate recruitment and retention in areas that narrowly miss shortage-area thresholds.
  • Taxpayers and policymakers — absent offsetting cuts, the change increases entitlement spending and shifts budgetary priorities toward incentive-based workforce spending.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The bill pits a focused, higher payment incentive aimed at increasing behavioral health capacity in shortage areas against the fiscal and administrative costs of expanding entitlement payments and the risk of uneven, gaming-prone implementation; policymakers must balance attracting clinicians with protecting program integrity and ensuring that added dollars translate into measurable access improvements rather than short-term billing shifts.

The bill pushes significant implementation responsibilities to CMS. The statute ties eligibility to areas the Secretary 'identifies' as mental health professional shortage areas under the Public Health Service Act, but it does not specify the criteria or cadence for those designations.

CMS will need to decide whether to reuse existing HPSA data structures, create a separate mental health HPSA list, or combine metrics, and those methodological choices will determine which communities actually benefit.

The definitions of 'specified health services' and the list of 'applicable practitioners' leave important operational questions unresolved. The Secretary must translate the statutory phrases into diagnostic, CPT/HCPCS, and practitioner-type rules that claims processors can use.

That process creates room for disputes over which visits qualify, how to treat telehealth or collaborative-care billing, and whether bundled or incident-to services get the add-on. There is also a risk that providers or organizations could change billing patterns or relocate to maximize bonus eligibility, producing short-term gains in capacity but also potential geographic shifts that do not match long-term access needs.

Finally, the higher add-on increases Medicare spending; without guardrails or outcome measures, it may be difficult to determine whether the incentive yields sustained access improvements proportional to cost.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.