This bill creates the Truth and Healing Commission on Indian Boarding School Policies in the legislative branch to investigate the history, operations, and long-term effects of Indian Boarding School Policies on Native American and Native Hawaiian peoples; to coordinate convenings and trauma‑informed testimony; to locate and manage burial sites; and to develop recommendations for federal action. The Commission is supported by two advisory committees—the Native American Truth and Healing Advisory Committee and the Federal and Religious Truth and Healing Advisory Committee—and a Survivors Truth and Healing Subcommittee that centers survivors and descendants.
The statute prescribes the Commission’s structure, funding source ($90 million specified from two Indian programs), investigatory powers, archiving and repatriation authorities, and reporting deadlines (including an initial report and a final report with required concurrence rules). It also exempts certain advisory work from the Federal Advisory Committee Act and narrows some disclosure obligations for the Federal and Religious advisory body, while expressly denying a private right of action under the Act.
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates a time-limited federal Truth and Healing Commission with investigatory powers to collect records (public and private), hold regional convenings, assess impacts of boarding‑school policies, locate burial sites, accept gifts, and recommend federal changes. It establishes two advisory committees (Native American; Federal and Religious) and a 15‑member Survivors Subcommittee to shape convenings and reports.
Who It Affects
Survivors and descendants of Indian Boarding Schools, Indian Tribes, Tribal organizations, Native Hawaiian organizations, Federal agencies that hold records or manage lands, religious institutions that operated or hold materials from schools, museums, and cultural repositories.
Why It Matters
It centralizes a national fact‑finding effort and a federal mechanism for coordinated record collection, archiving, repatriation, and burial management—activities that can unlock records and sites long held across agencies and private institutions and produce cross‑agency recommendations for remediation, memorialization, and services.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill sets up a legislative‑branch Commission—the Truth and Healing Commission on Indian Boarding School Policies—to run for up to six years. The Commission will gather existing scholarship and records (including from archives, federal agencies, religious institutions, museums, and private holders), hold public and private regional convenings with trauma‑informed supports, and make recommendations to Congress and specified federal officials.
The Commission may accept gifts, coordinate archiving with the Library of Congress and Smithsonian, and enter contracts to care for artifacts and property when purchase is not funded by federal money.
To ensure survivor and tribal input, the bill establishes a 15‑member Survivors Truth and Healing Subcommittee (12 regional representatives plus Hawai‘i, with a minimum number of former students and descendants), and a 19‑member Native American advisory committee composed of regional representatives and organizational seats. A separate Federal and Religious advisory committee is created inside DOI with federal agency officials and three religious‑institution representatives; that committee has narrowed disclosure rules for its records.
The Federal Advisory Committee Act does not apply to the Commission or its subcommittees, streamlining internal procedures but raising transparency tradeoffs.Reporting is structured: an initial report is due not later than four years after a Commission majority is seated, and the final report must be delivered before the Commission terminates. The final report’s findings and recommendations require a majority of Commission votes and a 3/5 concurrence of both the Native American advisory committee and the Survivors Subcommittee.
After publication, relevant cabinet secretaries must publicly respond to agency recommendations within 120 days. The statute provides $90,000,000 drawn from specified Indian program funds to carry out the Act and authorizes co‑stewardship agreements and reburials on federal land as agreed by affected parties.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill establishes the Commission in the legislative branch and terminates the Commission 6 years after enactment.
It funds the Commission with $90,000,000 drawn from specified Indian Land Consolidation Act and Indian Financing Act authorities.
The Survivors Truth and Healing Subcommittee must have 15 members: one representative from each of the 12 BIA regions, one from Hawai‘i, nine former students (including at least two recent graduates), five descendants, and one educator.
The Federal and Religious Truth and Healing Advisory Committee is placed within DOI, includes senior federal officials and three religious‑institution representatives, and its records are exempted from the Privacy Act and certain FOIA disclosures in statute.
The Commission must deliver an initial report within 4 years after a majority of members are appointed and a final report before termination; the final report’s recommendations require a majority of Commissioners plus a 3/5 vote of both the Native American advisory committee and the Survivors Subcommittee, and relevant Secretaries must publicly respond within 120 days.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Purposes
Lists four core goals: create the Commission and advisory bodies; investigate histories and long‑term effects of Indian Boarding Schools and policies; develop federal recommendations; and promote survivor healing. That framing directs the Commission to mix historical documentation with policy prescriptions and healing activities rather than focusing solely on archival research.
Definitions
Defines key terms the Commission will use, including a broad definition of 'Indian Boarding School' (sites with on‑site housing, federal support, pre‑1969 operation or listed in the 2022 Interior report, and any institution implementing boarding‑school policies). It also defines 'Indian Boarding School Policies' to include assimilation tactics and identity‑altering practices, and incorporates statutory definitions for 'Indian,' 'Indian Tribe,' and 'Native Hawaiian.' These definitions shape the Commission’s jurisdiction over institutions, records, and practices.
Commission establishment and membership
Creates the Commission in the legislative branch, prescribes appointment mechanics (a set of Congressional leaders and Senate Indian Affairs leaders appoint members), sets qualification criteria emphasizing tribal and trauma‑informed experience, limits commissioners from federal employment, sets compensation and travel rules, and specifies that the Commission may accept gifts and contract for services. It also exempts the Commission from the Federal Advisory Committee Act and requires the Commission to finalize convening protocols with survivor and Native American designees.
Commission duties: investigation, convenings, burials, and reporting
Charges the Commission with an interdisciplinary, comprehensive investigation: reviewing archival and private research, coordinating with federal agencies and religious institutions to obtain records, assessing cultural and intergenerational impacts, and identifying burial sites. The Commission must hold regional convenings (at least one in each BIA region and Hawai‘i) with trauma‑informed supports, publish an initial report within four years of a majority being seated, and a final report before termination. The statute explicitly authorizes coordination with the Smithsonian and Library of Congress for archiving and directs agency responses to final recommendations.
Survivors Truth and Healing Subcommittee
Establishes a 15‑member survivors subcommittee focused on centering survivors' voices in convenings, criteria, and report drafting. It sets appointment timelines, compensation, trauma‑informed obligations for convenings, quorum and removal rules, and a termination date tied to the Commission’s final report. The subcommittee must appoint designees to participate non‑voting on Commission meetings, ensuring survivor representation at decision points.
Native American Truth and Healing Advisory Committee
Creates a 19‑member advisory committee composed of regional representatives, Tribal organizational seats, and specified federal designees; requires that members include people experienced with culturally responsive health or healing practices. The committee advises the Commission on convenings, documentation needs, archival priorities, and report production, and appoints designees to participate on Commission business meetings without voting rights.
Federal and Religious Truth and Healing Advisory Committee
Places a 20‑member advisory committee within DOI made up largely of senior federal officials, agency designees, and three religious‑institution representatives appointed by the White House Office of Faith‑Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. The statute restricts application of the Privacy Act and narrows FOIA access to the committee’s records, tasks the committee with coordinating agency records and religious institution submissions, and exempts this advisory committee from FACA.
General provisions: NAGPRA, reburial, co‑stewardship, and no private cause of action
Clarifies that NAGPRA applies to cultural items relating to Indian Boarding Schools regardless of agency interpretations; directs federal agencies to permit reburials on federal lands as agreed by parties; authorizes co‑stewardship agreements for cemeteries and school sites; and states explicitly that the Act creates no private right of action, making the Commission’s outputs and processes administrative and recommendatory rather than a basis for litigation.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Indigenous Affairs across all five countries.
Explore Indigenous Affairs in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Survivors and descendants — gain formal, trauma‑informed convenings to tell their stories, potential access to burial locations and records, and federal attention to memorialization, health, and cultural impacts.
- Indian Tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations — receive a federal mechanism to gather documentation, coordinate repatriation and reburials, shape memorialization, and press for policy changes that recognize tribal law and custom.
- Cultural institutions and archives (Library of Congress, Smithsonian, museums) — get statutory direction to coordinate archiving and preservation, which can clarify custodial responsibilities and create pathways for long‑term stewardship.
- Researchers and public historians — will gain a consolidated body of Commission‑curated records, reports, and analyses that can support scholarship and education initiatives.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal agencies (Interior, Education, HHS, Defense, NIH, Indian Health Service) — must devote staff time and records, coordinate inter‑agency searches, support convenings, and respond publicly to recommendations, creating administrative and logistical burdens.
- Religious institutions and private archives — face responsibilities to locate and provide archival material and collaborate on preservation and repatriation work, with attendant reputational and operational costs.
- Taxpayers/federal budget — the bill designates $90 million from specified Indian program funds to implement the Commission; that appropriation is a direct fiscal outlay.
- Survivors and communities — while the bill funds trauma‑informed supports, participation in testimony and convenings can place emotional and social burdens on survivors and descendants who revisit traumatic experiences.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing a thorough, transparent national truth‑seeking effort and public archival access against survivors’ privacy, tribal sovereignty, and the need for culturally appropriate control of sensitive materials; the statute accelerates discovery and archiving but limits legal enforceability and creates transparency tradeoffs through advisory committee exemptions, leaving questions about who ultimately controls access, interpretation, and follow‑through on recommendations.
The bill creates a powerful fact‑finding and convening mechanism but leaves important implementation details unresolved. It exempts the Commission and its subcommittees from the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and the Federal and Religious advisory body receives statutory carve‑outs from the Privacy Act and some FOIA disclosure—measures that streamline operations but reduce independent transparency and oversight.
At the same time, the statute denies a private right of action, meaning individuals and Tribes cannot sue under this law to compel compliance or seek remedies based on the Commission’s findings.
Operationally, the Act instructs agencies and religious institutions to produce records, identify burial sites, and enter co‑stewardship agreements, but it stops short of creating compulsory enforcement tools or funding mechanisms for expensive activities such as archaeological investigations, long‑term curation, or land access negotiations; the statute even bars use of federal funds to buy private artifacts. The $90 million allocation is explicit but tied to existing Indian program funds, which may not align with the full costs of multi‑agency searches, preservation, repatriation, healthcare services, or sustained memorialization efforts.
Finally, the requirement that final recommendations secure both a Commission majority and a 3/5 concurrence of two advisory bodies raises the risk of deadlock that could blunt the Commission’s policy impact.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.