The Daylight Act of 2026 amends the 1918 Calder Act to change the statutory offsets for U.S. standard time zones by 30 minutes (reducing each listed hour offset by 0.5 hours) and repeals the Uniform Time Act provision governing Daylight Saving Time. The bill makes the half‑hour shift permanent nationwide and removes the cited federal statutory authority that has governed seasonal daylight‑saving adjustments.
For businesses, governments, and technology operators the bill creates a single, immediate legal change: statutory standard times move by 30 minutes and the federal DST rule referenced in the Calder Act is struck down. That produces near‑term operational work (clocks, schedules, payroll systems, international coordination) and longer‑term legal questions about alignment with states, territories, and international partners.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill amends the Calder Act’s statutory language to reduce each of the listed hour offsets by 0.5 hours (shifting statutory standard time earlier by 30 minutes across the enumerated U.S. zones) and repeals the Uniform Time Act provision that governs Daylight Saving Time. It establishes a single, permanent time structure rather than a seasonal adjustment regime.
Who It Affects
State and local governments, employers, payroll and timekeeping vendors, transportation and logistics companies, broadcasters and software platforms that timestamp activity, and any entity that coordinates cross‑border schedules will be directly affected. Federal agencies responsible for timekeeping and communications must also implement the statutory change.
Why It Matters
This is a statutory redefinition of U.S. legal time — not just a policy preference. It replaces a seasonal system with a permanent half‑hour shift, so affected organizations must update operational systems and reconsider international and interstate scheduling that currently assumes whole‑hour offsets or DST transitions.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill rewrites the Calder Act’s table of standard time offsets so that every enumerated U.S. time zone is defined 30 minutes closer to Greenwich Mean Time than under current statutory language. In practice, the statutory offsets that previously read in whole‑hour increments are reduced by one half hour across the board.
The text accomplishes this by striking each listed hour value and inserting the corresponding value minus 0.5 hours.
Separately, the bill repeals the specified section of the Uniform Time Act that governs Daylight Saving Time. By removing that statutory provision, the bill eliminates the federal statutory reference that has enabled seasonal clock changes in the United States; combined with the Calder Act edits, the result is a single, year‑round set of statutory times rather than a framework that includes seasonal shifting.The Act takes effect 90 days after enactment.
That short implementation window will require vendors and public entities to change device firmware, database time‑zone flags, scheduling rules, payroll cutoffs, and transportation timetables to reflect the new legal times. It also raises coordination questions with international partners and cross‑border systems that expect whole‑hour offsets or continue to observe seasonal DST adjustments.The bill is narrowly drafted: it changes statutory hour listings and repeals the one Uniform Time Act provision; it does not create a new administrative agency, nor does it add transition funding or a federal implementation plan.
That means implementation responsibility primarily falls on existing federal, state, and private operators who use statutory time as the legal baseline for clock‑setting and scheduling.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill reduces each statutory hour offset in the Calder Act by 0.5 hours (for example, an offset listed as “5 hours” becomes “4.5 hours”).
It repeals Section 3 of the Uniform Time Act of 1966, the federal provision tied to Daylight Saving Time.
The change is statutory and permanent—the bill does not provide for a seasonal DST regime; it makes the half‑hour shift the year‑round legal time.
The Act becomes effective 90 days after enactment, creating a rapid compliance window for operational updates.
The amendment operates by editing the second sentence of section 1 of the Calder Act (15 U.S.C. 261) rather than creating a new statutory mechanism or administrative transition process.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title — 'Daylight Act of 2026'
This is the formal short‑title clause. It has no operative effect on substantive law but frames the bill’s purpose for statutory citation and commentary.
Amendments to the Calder Act’s statutory offsets
This subsection targets the second sentence of section 1 of the Calder Act (15 U.S.C. 261) and replaces the listed hour offsets with values that are 0.5 hours smaller. Practically, it changes how statutory standard time is defined in federal law. Because many state laws, contracts, and systems reference federal statutory time, this single textual edit cascades into operational changes: clock displays, legal definitions tied to ‘‘standard time,’’ scheduling, and timestamping. The bill accomplishes the shift by direct textual substitution rather than by granting regulatory authority to adjust times, which limits administrative discretion but concentrates the burden of implementation on downstream users.
Repeal of the Uniform Time Act provision on Daylight Saving Time
This subsection repeals Section 3 of the Uniform Time Act of 1966 (15 U.S.C. 260a). That provision has been integral to the statutory framework for Daylight Saving Time and for the Uniform Time Act’s interaction with state opt‑outs. Repealing it removes a federal statutory instrument that currently governs the seasonal transition regime; combined with the Calder edits, the effect is to end the federal statutory basis for seasonal clock changes and leave a single, permanent statutory time in place.
Effective date — 90 days after enactment
The Act takes full effect 90 days after the date of enactment. The statute does not provide phased implementation, funding, or regulatory guidance. That fixed, near‑term deadline means private vendors, state agencies, and federal offices must plan and execute technical and legal updates in a compressed window.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Evening‑oriented retail and hospitality businesses — A permanent shift that produces more legal daylight in later hours can align consumer activity with business hours without seasonal transitions.
- Entities that operate scheduling infrastructure (airlines, broadcasters) — Eliminating seasonal clock changes reduces the recurring operational complexity of twice‑annual schedule adjustments.
- Software and services that sell time‑zone stability to clients — Organizations that prefer a single, constant time standard can use the statutory clarity as a selling point.
- Commuters and outdoor recreation providers in regions that gain lighter evenings — Local economies that benefit from later daylight hours may see more consistent demand across the year.
Who Bears the Cost
- Payroll processors, HR departments, and employers — They must update timekeeping logic, overtime calculations, and pay cutoffs to reflect the new legal time within a 90‑day window.
- IT and SaaS providers (calendar, database, logging infrastructure) — Systems that assume whole‑hour offsets or follow IANA time zone rules will need patches and possibly new mapping rules to reconcile statutory time with established time‑zone databases.
- Transportation and logistics companies — Timetables, international connections, and regulatory reporting that rely on standard offsets will need rescheduling and customer communications.
- State and local governments and courts — Statutes, court rules, and administrative deadlines that reference federal ‘‘standard time’’ may require statutory or rule changes; administering that work imposes costs on public entities.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between the desire for a single, permanent legal time that removes seasonal clock changes (simplicity and predictability) and the practical costs of creating an uncommon, permanent half‑hour offset that fragments alignment with international time‑keeping norms and imposes rapid, dispersed implementation burdens on governments and private systems.
The bill’s approach is surgical: it edits statutory hour values and repeals a single section of the Uniform Time Act rather than creating an implementing authority or transition plan. That brevity is efficient on its face but shifts substantial implementation risk to downstream stakeholders.
The statutory half‑hour offset is atypical for the U.S. and for many international partners, so systems that assume whole‑hour offsets (including some legacy industrial controllers, aviation systems, and international scheduling software) may fail silently or require custom mapping. The bill does not address whether and how the IANA time‑zone database, international civil aviation rules, or bilateral agreements should treat the new legal times, leaving interoperability questions unresolved.
Legal ambiguity is another unresolved issue. Repealing the cited Uniform Time Act provision alters federal statutory authority over DST but does not expressly preempt state laws that refer to ‘‘standard time’’ or that previously opted out of DST under federal rules.
States that have enacted their own time statutes or that rely on federal law to justify exemptions could face litigation or legislative patchwork. Finally, the 90‑day effective date gives little time for contractual, regulatory, and technical fixes; the bill contains no appropriation or federal coordination mechanism to assist public or private entities, meaning implementation costs are borne without designated funding or central guidance.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.