The bill requires the President to impose blocking sanctions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) on foreign persons the Treasury (with State) determines are buying, importing, financing, insuring, or otherwise facilitating crude oil or petroleum products of Russian Federation origin. Those sanctions cover property in the United States, property that comes into the United States, or property controlled by U.S. persons.
The measure builds a structured exception regime that lets the President approve limited carve-outs—no more than two at a time—so countries can continue purchases under strict conditions such as isolating payments into domestic accounts, depositing per-barrel payments into a Ukraine benefit account, or demonstrating substantial support for Ukraine. The bill includes a 5-year sunset and specific timelines and oversight for exceptions, making it a targeted tool to pressure Russian oil revenue while attempting to manage energy and humanitarian trade-offs.
At a Glance
What It Does
It mandates IEEPA blocking sanctions on foreign persons involved in the purchase, importation, or material facilitation of Russian-origin crude or petroleum products, and authorizes the President to carve out up to two types of exceptions under narrowly defined conditions. The Treasury, in consultation with State, makes the designation determinations.
Who It Affects
Foreign oil traders, maritime shippers, insurers, commodity brokers, banks and other financial intermediaries that process payments related to Russian-origin oil are targeted. U.S. persons face an expanded compliance duty because blocked property and transactions involving designated foreign persons become prohibited.
Why It Matters
The bill expands the United States’ extraterritorial sanctions toolkit against the Russian energy sector while embedding explicit mechanisms to channel some payments to Ukraine and to preserve limited commercial flows subject to oversight. That combination raises enforcement, verification, and diplomatic coordination issues for governments and private-sector compliance programs.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Starting 90 days after enactment, the President must use the powers in IEEPA to block and prohibit transactions and property of foreign persons whom Treasury, with State’s input, finds are responsible for purchasing or importing Russian-origin crude or petroleum products, knowingly facilitating financial transactions tied to those purchases, materially supporting such actors, or serving as senior officers or board members of those entities. The scope is broad: it reaches property in the U.S., property that transits into the U.S., and property controlled by U.S. persons, which effectively bars U.S. banks, insurers, and service providers from transacting with designated entities.
The statute builds a constrained exception regime: the President may apply at most two exception types among four categories. One exception lets countries keep purchases flowing if payments are credited to a domestic account and restricted to purchases of agricultural commodities, food, medicine, or medical devices from Russia, conditioned on a demonstrable reduction in purchase volumes.
Another exception permits purchases if a per-barrel payment is deposited into a U.S.-established account for Ukraine; the bill prescribes permissible uses, periodic disbursement cadence, and congressional notification and certification requirements tied to transfers. A third exception covers countries that provide ‘‘significant’’ economic or military support to Ukraine, subject to 180‑day renewal certifications.
Finally, the President may temporarily exempt specific Russian export ports for up to 270 days, subject to a limit that such ports never represent more than half of Russia’s 2024 export capacity.To close circumvention routes, the bill explicitly carves out one rule: no exception applies where activities facilitate maritime transport, trading, financing, shipping, insurance, flagging, or customs brokering for cargoes sold above the relevant price cap set by Treasury. That clause applies irrespective of whether the service provider is in a G7 country.
The statute also includes a five-year sunset on the authority and sets out definitions for terms such as "foreign person," "knowing," "medical device," and "agricultural commodity," which will shape enforcement and compliance.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Sanctions trigger 90 days after enactment and require the President to block property and transactions of foreign persons identified by Treasury (with State) using IEEPA authorities.
The President may authorize at most two exception types at once from a menu that includes domestic-account isolation, deposits into a Ukraine benefit account, recognition of countries supporting Ukraine, and a 270‑day, port-specific temporary exception.
The Ukraine-deposit exception conditions use of funds: monies go into an account for benefit of Ukraine, may be used only for specified humanitarian and defense purposes, must be disbursed at least every 90 days to a ‘‘significant proportion,’’ and require congressional notification and a transparency certification before transfers.
Any exception does not apply to activities that facilitate maritime transport, trading, financing, insurance, flagging, or customs brokering where the crude or product is purchased above the Treasury’s price cap — and that prohibition applies regardless of whether the service provider is under G7 jurisdiction.
All sanctions and the authority to impose them automatically terminate five years after enactment (sunset provision).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Names the measure the 'Decreasing Russian Oil Profits Act of 2026.' This is purely stylistic but frames the statute's intent: to reduce Russia’s oil revenue through sanctions. Practically, the short title signals congressional intent which can influence statutory interpretation.
Designation criteria for foreign persons
Directs the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, to identify foreign persons for sanctions if they purchase or import Russian-origin crude or petroleum, knowingly facilitate related financial transactions, materially support designated actors, or serve as senior management or board members of such entities. The provision intentionally sweeps broadly to capture not just buyers but the financial, managerial, and service networks that enable trade.
Scope of sanctions — IEEPA blocking actions
Mandates that the President exercise IEEPA authorities 'to the extent necessary' to block and prohibit all transactions in property of designated foreign persons that are in the U.S., come into the U.S., or are controlled by U.S. persons. That language authorizes comprehensive blocking orders that can freeze assets, bar U.S. trade with designated entities, and prohibit U.S. financial institutions from facilitating transactions connected to those persons.
Exception framework — limited and conditional
Authorizes the President to apply no more than two exception types from a specified set. Each exception has precise conditions: the 'isolation' exception requires payments to be credited to a domestic account used only for humanitarian/agricultural purchases and evidence of significant reductions in Russian purchases; the 'country-supporting-Ukraine' exception requires certification of substantial economic or military support to Ukraine and periodic recertification; and temporary port exceptions are time-limited and capped to avoid exempting the bulk of Russian export capacity.
Ukraine-benefit deposit account — use and oversight
Allows an exception when per-barrel payments are deposited into an account established for Ukraine, but tightly conditions use: funds may be used only for purposes listed in prior Ukraine assistance law and for purchases of defense articles, with a requirement to disburse a significant portion at least every 90 days. The provision builds in congressional oversight: State must notify committees 15 days before transfers, the President must certify transparency/accountability plans, and Congress can block transfers via joint resolution within 15 days.
Price-cap carveout, sunset, and definitions
Specifies that exceptions do not shield activities facilitating maritime transport or other services when the purchase price exceeds the Treasury price cap, and that this limitation applies regardless of the service provider’s jurisdiction (not only G7). The section sets a five-year statutory sunset for these authorities and supplies operative definitions (e.g., 'foreign person,' 'knowing,' 'United States person') that will guide enforcement, designation, and compliance determinations.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Foreign Affairs across all five countries.
Explore Foreign Affairs in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Government of Ukraine — receives a dedicated funding stream under the deposit-account exception, enabling recurring transfers for humanitarian and defense needs with statutory disbursement requirements.
- Policymakers and sanctions enforcers in the United States and allied capitals — gain a statutory tool designed to cut Russian oil revenue while giving explicitly defined mechanisms to manage political and energy-security trade-offs.
- Countries that isolate Russian funds under the domestic-account exception — can continue limited energy imports while legally shielding their banks and commercial actors from U.S. blocking sanctions if they meet the statute’s conditions.
Who Bears the Cost
- Foreign oil traders, commodity brokers, maritime shippers, insurers, and flag registries — face designation risk and compliance costs because the bill targets not only buyers but service providers and financiers who facilitate trade in Russian-origin oil.
- Banks and financial intermediaries worldwide — must enhance transaction screening and due diligence to avoid processing payments tied to designated persons or barrels sold above the Treasury price cap; U.S. banks also face expanded blocking responsibilities.
- Governments that continue substantial Russian oil purchases without meeting exception criteria — risk having key commercial actors sanctioned, which could complicate diplomatic relations and disrupt energy supply chains.
- U.S. and allied enforcement agencies — incur monitoring and investigative burdens (tracking origin, transshipment, and compliance with deposit-account conditions), potentially requiring new resources or interagency coordination.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill pits the goal of sharply reducing Russian oil revenues through extraterritorial sanctions against the need to preserve global energy flows and allied cooperation: tighter restrictions maximize economic pressure on Russia but increase the risk of market disruption, diplomatic friction, and enforcement complexity; looser, conditional exceptions preserve supply and allies’ buy-in but create avenues for evasion and dilute the sanctions’ economic impact.
The statute relies on broad IEEPA authority and an expansive definition of 'foreign person' and 'knowing' conduct, which gives Treasury significant discretion but also creates hard enforcement problems. Determining whether crude or petroleum products are of "Russian Federation origin" is operationally difficult once cargoes are blended, transshipped, or relabeled; criminals and sophisticated traders can exploit intermediaries, ship-to-ship transfers, and complex finance structures to obscure provenance.
The bill attempts to blunt some circumvention by targeting maritime and associated services for cargoes sold above the price cap, but the practicalities of monitoring contracts, bills of lading, and insurance chains across jurisdictions will strain enforcement.
The exceptions create political and implementation trade-offs. The domestic-account and Ukraine-deposit options offer diplomatic cover for purchasers, but they require reliable verification that funds are isolated and used as prescribed; the statute leans on presidential certifications and notification timelines rather than creating an independent auditing mechanism.
The Ukraine-account transfer process includes a congressional check (15-day joint-resolution window), which could politicize fund releases and slow urgent disbursements. Finally, the five-year sunset limits long-term predictability, which may affect how private actors invest in compliance systems or how countries structure multi-year energy contracts.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.