The Pensions for All Act requires every employer and every self‑employed individual in the United States either to make a FERS‑comparable retirement plan available to their workers or to elect participation in the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS). The bill amends title 5 (FERS and the Thrift Savings Plan), creates a new federal tax credit for small employers and self‑employed contributors, and imposes a daily penalty tax for failures to offer or participate.
This is a structural shift: it opens FERS to non‑federal workers, standardizes an equivalency test for “covered retirement programs,” and layers federal tax incentives and limits on employer contribution reductions to ease the burden on smaller employers and lower‑income self‑employed people. The Secretary of Labor, the Office of Personnel Management, and the Treasury are central to administering elections, contribution mechanics, and transfers to the Thrift Savings Fund.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires each employer (and each self‑employed person) to either (A) offer employees a retirement program the Secretary of Labor deems comparable to FERS, or (B) notify the Secretary and have those employees participate in FERS. It amends the FERS statute to add ‘covered non‑Federal employees’ and ‘covered self‑employed individuals,’ expands Thrift Savings Plan rules, and creates a tax credit and an employer penalty tax for noncompliance.
Who It Affects
All private and non‑Federal public employers, gig and self‑employed workers, ERISA plan sponsors and retirement plan vendors, payroll processors, and federal administrators (Labor, OPM, Treasury and the TSP’s Executive Director). Small employers and lower‑income self‑employed taxpayers get phased relief via reduced employer share and a refundable tax credit option.
Why It Matters
The bill effectively nationalizes a FERS‑level retirement floor: it sets a federal standard for retirement adequacy and forces broad administrative integration with FERS/TSP. That changes the retirement landscape for employers without plans, expands the TSP participant base, and creates new compliance costs and tax‑policy tradeoffs for employers and the self‑employed.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act creates two parallel paths for retirement coverage: an employer may either adopt a ‘covered retirement program’—a private plan that the Secretary of Labor finds delivers benefits comparable to FERS—or elect to enroll its employees directly in FERS. Self‑employed individuals face the same binary choice.
The Secretary of Labor sets the comparability standard and the timing for annual elections to switch between covered plans and FERS participation.
To make non‑Federal participation administrable, the bill amends title 5 to add definitions for ‘covered non‑Federal employer,’ ‘covered non‑Federal employee,’ and ‘covered self‑employed individual,’ and modifies many FERS and Thrift Savings Plan provisions so they apply to these new categories. Employers must withhold employee contributions at the same percentage as federal employees and either remit employer contributions to the Thrift Savings Fund or to the covered retirement program.
For self‑employed participants the bill treats deemed withholdings as deposits that the individual must remit to the Treasury in a manner the Secretary prescribes.The bill phases contribution relief for smaller employers and lower‑income self‑employed people: it sets a baseline 50 percent reduction in employer/self contribution obligations for employers with $25M or less in annual revenue and for self‑employed individuals with basic pay up to $75,000, then phases that reduction down for larger firms and higher incomes using fixed revenue and income bands. Employers and self‑employed persons may elect annually to forgo those reductions (i.e., pay the full employer share) in order to qualify for a new tax credit.Section 5 creates a new Internal Revenue Code credit (section 36A) that covers up to 50 percent of qualifying employer or self‑employed contributions, phased down by firm revenue or individual income using the same thresholds.
The bill also adds a new penalty tax (section 4980J): $10 per day per affected employee or self‑employed person for failure to offer a covered retirement program or to participate in FERS, subject to reasonable‑cause waivers and a $500,000 cap in unintentional failure cases. Finally, the statute prohibits employers from reducing any form of existing compensation because of this Act’s coverage requirement.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill forces employers (and every self‑employed person) to either offer a Secretary‑approved FERS‑comparable plan or enroll workers in FERS, and requires annual opportunities to switch between those choices.
It amends 5 U.S.C. chapter 84 to treat covered non‑Federal employees and covered self‑employed individuals as eligible for FERS benefits, payroll withholding, and Thrift Savings Plan participation.
Employer and self‑employed contribution obligations are initially cut by 50% for small employers (≤ $25M revenue) and lower‑income self‑employed people (≤ $75,000), with a sliding phase‑in through the next revenue/income bands; employers can elect to waive the reduction and remain fully liable.
Section 5 creates a new tax credit (IRC §36A) that pays an employer or self‑employed individual up to 50% of qualified pension contributions, with the credit phased down by firm revenue or individual income using the same thresholds.
Failure to comply triggers a new payroll tax (IRC §4980J): $10 per day per affected worker, ending on correction or three months after termination for that employee, with a $500,000 cap for reasonable‑cause nonwillful failures and a Secretary waiver authority.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Gives the Act the short title “Pensions for All Act.” Practical effect: none beyond naming the statute for references in implementing regulations and guidance.
Key definitions and equivalency standard
Defines ‘covered retirement program,’ ‘covered non‑Federal employer/employee,’ and ‘covered self‑employed individual,’ and delegates to the Secretary of Labor the authority to determine whether a non‑FERS plan provides benefits comparable to FERS. Practically, this centralizes the equivalency judgment in Labor and creates a gatekeeping role that will drive regulatory guidance, review processes, and compliance timelines.
Employer and self‑employed coverage requirement and election window
Requires every employer to either (A) make a covered retirement program available or (B) notify the Secretary and have its employees participate in FERS; imposes the same binary choice on self‑employed people. Also establishes Secretary‑determined, but at least annual, windows for employers and self‑employed individuals to switch between a covered plan and FERS participation, which creates recurring administrative elections to manage payroll, contributions, and plan transitions.
Extends FERS/TSP mechanics to non‑Federal participants
Amends multiple provisions of title 5 so that non‑Federal employees and self‑employed participants become creditable service under FERS, are subject to the same employee contribution percentages, and may contribute to the Thrift Savings Fund. The bill creates deemed withholding rules for self‑employed persons and requires the Treasury to credit the Thrift Savings Fund for contribution reductions allocated to small employers or lower‑income individuals. These mechanics require new collection, remittance, and TSP accounting processes.
Tax credit for employers and self‑employed contributors (IRC §36A)
Adds IRC §36A to allow an eligible taxpayer a credit equal to a percentage of qualifying pension contributions. The credit is up to 50% and phases down based on employer gross receipts or individual income bands that mirror the contribution‑reduction schedule. Eligible taxpayers include employers that opt out of reduced contributions and employers that are not classified as ‘covered non‑Federal employers,’ plus self‑employed electors. The credit is integrated into the general business credit regime and contains coordination rules to prevent double benefit.
Penalty tax for failures (IRC §4980J)
Adds IRC §4980J: a $10‑per‑day tax for each employee or self‑employed person affected by a failure to offer coverage or participate in FERS, capped in cases of reasonable cause and subject to waiver. It defines noncompliance periods, provides for inflation adjustments to the per‑day amount, treats aggregated employers as a single taxpayer for liability, and allows the Secretary to waive amounts when payment would be excessive relative to the failure.
Prohibition on reducing compensation
Prevents employers from reducing any form of employee compensation that existed on the date of enactment as a response to the Act’s coverage requirement. This clause aims to block offsetting wage cuts but will require enforcement guidance and raises questions about what counts as a compensatory reduction (bonuses, benefits conversions, etc.).
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Employment across all five countries.
Explore Employment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Employees without prior employer plans — gain either access to a FERS‑level retirement program or automatic enrollment into FERS and TSP participation, improving retirement portability and default savings options.
- Lower‑income self‑employed people and small‑firm employees — receive phased contribution relief and a refundable tax credit designed to lower the initial cost of compliance and increase participation.
- Retirement plan vendors and advisors — new demand for ‘covered retirement programs’ that meet the Secretary’s equivalency test will create a market for plan design, equivalency certifications, and conversion services.
- Thrift Savings Plan participants — TSP stands to gain scale and asset inflows as non‑Federal workers and self‑employed participants join or contribute, which may lower investment costs and increase political prominence of the fund.
Who Bears the Cost
- Mid‑sized and large employers that must fund increased retirement contributions or convert payroll to FERS mechanics — they face new recurring employer contributions, administrative integration costs, and potential actuarial adjustments for existing plans.
- Higher‑income self‑employed individuals — though phased, they face new mandatory contributions or must fund a private comparable plan at FERS levels, reducing after‑tax income.
- Payroll processors, HR systems suppliers, and plan administrators — must implement withholding, remittance, contribution reductions, and annual election windows; these are one‑time and recurring implementation costs.
- Federal agencies (Labor, OPM, Treasury, TSP) — significant implementation, rulemaking, account‑integration, and compliance monitoring responsibilities with associated operational costs not funded by the bill text.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The Act reconciles two legitimate objectives—expanding access to secure, FERS‑level retirement benefits for all workers, and avoiding undue cost shocks for employers and small‑scale self‑employed taxpayers—but it cannot fully achieve both. A uniform, high‑quality retirement floor requires mandatory employer contributions and complex federal administration; limiting employer costs requires phased reductions, elections, and tax subsidies that blunt the policy’s uniformity and create administration and distortion risks. The core trade‑off is between retirement adequacy for workers and the economic and administrative burden imposed on employers, payroll systems, and federal administrators.
The bill centralizes a critical, hard‑to‑specify standard—whether a private plan is ‘comparable’ to FERS—in the Secretary of Labor’s discretion. That delegation simplifies statutory design but creates implementation risk: the equivalency test will determine how many employers keep private plans versus opting FERS, which in turn drives TSP scale and federal administrative burden.
The statute does not specify detailed actuarial markers (accrual rates, vesting, survivor protections, COLA treatment) or a formal certification process, so Labor rulemaking will be decisive and potentially litigated.
Payment and collection mechanics also create unresolved frictions. The bill treats contributions by self‑employed individuals as ‘‘deemed’’ withholdings that the individual must deposit to the Treasury according to Secretary‑prescribed procedures; that raises timing, enforcement, and estimated‑tax issues.
The phased contribution reductions and optional elections (electing to forgo the reduction to become eligible for the tax credit) create design choices that may be gamed by firms near thresholds. The interaction with ERISA, multiemployer pension obligations, collective‑bargaining agreements, state law benefits mandates, and existing private DB/defined contribution plans is not spelled out in operational detail, leaving both legal ambiguity and transition costs for plan sponsors and unions.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.