This bill recognizes two civilian participants in the Civil War–era raid known as the Great Locomotive Chase with a single, posthumous Congressional Gold Medal. It frames the award as an act of national recognition for extraordinary bravery and places that recognition within federal commemorative practices.
For practitioners, the measure is primarily a symbolic gesture but creates directed administrative tasks: the Treasury must produce the medal, and the Smithsonian will receive and curate it. The bill also authorizes the Mint to sell bronze duplicates to cover production costs, which creates a limited revenue flow that reverts to the Mint’s Public Enterprise Fund.
At a Glance
What It Does
Authorizes Congress to present one collective Congressional Gold Medal honoring James J. Andrews and William H. Campbell and directs the Secretary of the Treasury to strike the medal. The medal is to be turned over to the Smithsonian for display and research, with an explicit recommendation it be shown at the Charles H. Coolidge National Medal of Honor Museum. The Mint may strike and sell bronze duplicates to cover costs.
Who It Affects
The United States Mint and Treasury (design and production work), the Smithsonian Institution (custody, display, and loaning responsibilities), descendants or custodians of Andrews and Campbell (symbolic recipients), and museums and collectors that may request loans or buy bronze duplicates.
Why It Matters
The bill extends formal federal recognition to two civilians associated with a high-profile Civil War operation and clarifies how the federal government handles design, custody, and monetization of commemorative medals. For cultural institutions and numismatists, it defines display and sales channels; for policymakers, it reinforces precedent about collective awards and use of Mint resources.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill instructs Congress to honor two civilians associated with Andrews’ Raiders for bravery during the Civil War by providing a single Congressional Gold Medal to commemorate their role in the Great Locomotive Chase. It names the individuals and describes the historical context that Congress relied on to justify recognition, framing the award as corrective recognition for acts of valor that occurred more than a century ago.
On administration, the bill requires the Secretary of the Treasury to produce an appropriately designed gold medal; the Secretary retains design authority, meaning the statute sets the obligation but lets Treasury handle artistic and technical choices. Once struck, the medal will be transferred to the Smithsonian Institution; Congress asks (but does not legally bind) the Smithsonian to display the medal, particularly at the Charles H.
Coolidge National Medal of Honor Museum, and to loan it when appropriate.To manage costs and public access, the bill authorizes the Mint to strike bronze duplicates of the gold medal and to sell those duplicates at a price sufficient to cover production and overhead. It designates medals under the bill as “national medals” and “numismatic items” for purposes of the relevant provisions of title 31, U.S. Code, and it authorizes charging the Mint Public Enterprise Fund for striking costs while requiring proceeds from sales to be deposited back into that Fund.
Those mechanics make the program self-funded within the Mint’s enterprise structure rather than requiring new appropriations.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Section 3(a) directs Congress to present one gold medal, collectively commemorating both James J. Andrews and William H. Campbell.
Section 3(c)(1) transfers the struck gold medal to the Smithsonian Institution for display and research custody.
Section 3(c)(2) expresses the sense of Congress that the Smithsonian should display the medal at the Charles H. Coolidge National Medal of Honor Museum and permit loans as appropriate.
Section 4 authorizes the Secretary to strike and sell duplicate bronze medals at prices sufficient to recoup costs, with proceeds deposited into the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund.
Section 5 classifies medals struck under the Act as national medals and as numismatic items under chapters and sections of title 31, U.S. Code, which governs federal minting and disposition rules.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Provides the Act’s formal citation as the "James J. Andrews and William H. Campbell Congressional Gold Medal Act." This is purely nominative but matters for official reference and codification.
Findings and historical context
Sets out Congress’s factual findings about Andrews, Campbell, the Great Locomotive Chase, and the historical recognition already given to members of Andrews’ Raiders (including past Medals of Honor). Findings do not create legal rights but supply the legislative rationale for the award; they also memorialize a specific narrative that may influence how museums and educators interpret the medal.
Authorization to strike and present a gold medal
Directs the Speaker of the House and the President pro tempore of the Senate to arrange presentation of a single collective gold medal and tasks the Secretary of the Treasury with striking the medal and determining emblems, devices, and inscriptions. The Secretary’s delegated design authority means Treasury will manage artistic, fabrication, and technical specifications, and bears responsibility for satisfying the statutory requirement in a practical way.
Smithsonian custody and congressional display preference
Requires transfer of the gold medal to the Smithsonian for preservation, display, and research access. The bill expresses a congressional preference that the Smithsonian exhibit the medal at the Charles H. Coolidge National Medal of Honor Museum and allow loans; the language is a 'sense of Congress' rather than a binding mandate, so curatorial judgment and facility capacity retain primacy in practice.
Authority to strike and sell duplicate bronze medals
Authorizes the Mint to produce bronze duplicates of the gold medal and sell them at a price set to recoup full costs, including labor and overhead. That mechanism is the standard approach Congress has used to make commemorative medals self-funding and creates channels for public purchase and broader dissemination of the commemorative image.
Legal status and funding mechanics
Declares medals under the Act to be national medals and numismatic items under title 31, which triggers existing statutory frameworks for minting and disposition. The bill authorizes charging the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund to cover production costs and requires that proceeds from duplicate sales return to that Fund, keeping the program financially internal to the Mint rather than dependent on new appropriations.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Descendants and custodians of Andrews and Campbell — receive formal national recognition that can assist family and local commemorative efforts and lends federal legitimacy to historical claims.
- Smithsonian Institution and the Charles H. Coolidge National Medal of Honor Museum — gain a nationally-sanctioned artifact that can attract visitors, support exhibits about Civil War valor, and expand educational programming.
- Regional museums where related artifacts are displayed (e.g., The Southern Museum, Atlanta History Center) — stand to benefit from loan opportunities and increased public interest in linked artifacts.
- Historians, educators, and Civil War heritage organizations — receive a tangible, federally recognized object to anchor research, curricula, and public history narratives.
- Numismatists and collectors — can purchase officially sanctioned bronze duplicates, broadening access to the commemorative image and creating a controlled secondary market.
Who Bears the Cost
- United States Mint/Treasury — tasked with medal design, striking, and sales administration; while costs charge the Mint’s Fund, Treasury resources and staff time are involved.
- Smithsonian Institution — assumes custodial, conservation, and display responsibilities (and any associated costs) unless supplemented by internal funds or partnerships; the 'sense of Congress' does not appropriate additional Smithsonian funding.
- Potential purchasers of bronze duplicates — pay market prices set to cover full costs; collectors face limited runs and pricing tied to Mint overhead.
- Curators and loan administrators at museums — incur logistical and security costs for displaying or loaning the medal, which may require scheduling and transport resources.
- Congressional offices and committees — must oversee presentation arrangements and any follow-up inquiries, consuming legislative staff time though not direct appropriations.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between honoring historical individuals through a high-profile federal award—which recognizes service, supports public history, and benefits cultural institutions—and the costs and precedents that federal recognition creates: design and curation decisions, use of Mint and Smithsonian resources, potential commercialization via duplicate sales, and the pressure to extend similar honors to other historical actors with comparable claims.
The bill is primarily symbolic but creates several administrative and curatorial obligations with practical implications. By leaving design and inscription choices to the Secretary of the Treasury, the statute avoids micromanaging artistic decisions but also invites potential disputes about historical representation; descendants, regional museums, or advocacy groups may push for particular inscriptions or iconography.
The transfer to the Smithsonian and the nonbinding 'sense of Congress' about display location leave actual curatorial decisions and scheduling to institutional judgment, which can create friction if local stakeholders expect a guaranteed showing.
Financially, the Mint Public Enterprise Fund mechanism insulates the program from immediate appropriations but concentrates costs and revenue within the Mint’s enterprise operations. That avoids a budget line item but also means the Mint must prioritize this work alongside other numismatic obligations.
The authorization to sell bronze duplicates is standard, but it also commercializes a commemorative act: depending on pricing and production scale, the sale could broaden access or be criticized as monetizing memory. Finally, there is a precedent question: awarding a Congressional Gold Medal collectively to civilians associated with military action raises issues about eligibility and whether similar recognition should follow for others in comparable situations, creating potential calls for additional awards and incremental administrative burden on the Mint and Smithsonian.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.