The Protecting Our Produce Act adds a new Title V to the Specialty Crops Competitiveness Act of 2004 directing USDA to run a pilot program that compensates producers of certain seasonal and perishable specialty crops when prices fall due to imports. The statute defines how prices and marketing windows are measured, sets producer eligibility criteria, and prescribes a formula for calculating payments.
Why this matters: the bill creates a narrowly framed federal response to import-driven price declines for time-sensitive specialty crops — a programmatic experiment that carries budgetary, administrative, and market-distortion risks. Compliance officers and farm-policy professionals should map how the bill’s definitions and triggers would interact with existing data sources, farm bookkeeping, and other federal farm programs.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires the Secretary of Agriculture to establish a pilot (beginning with marketing year 2025) that pays producers when the national average market price during a crop’s seasonal marketing window (the “effective price”) falls below a 5‑year trimmed average (“reference price”), and the Secretary determines the shortfall was caused by imports. Payments equal the per-unit price gap multiplied by a producer’s 5‑year trimmed average production for that crop.
Who It Affects
Directly affected are producers of the statute’s listed seasonal and perishable specialty crops (asparagus, bell peppers, blueberries, cucumbers, squash) who meet income and farm‑dependency thresholds. Indirectly affected stakeholders include regional supply chains that handle rapidly marketed produce, USDA data and program offices required to administer the pilot, and federal budget appropriators.
Why It Matters
The pilot tests a targeted, price‑gap compensation model for perishable specialty crops — a departure from insurance- and disaster-based aid — by tying payments to import causation and time-limited windows. The design choices here (eligible crops, national price measure, trimmed averages, causation standard, and annual authorization) will determine how quickly and predictably relief flows and whether the program creates incentives that alter production or trade patterns.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill inserts Title V into the Specialty Crops Competitiveness Act to create a narrowly scoped pilot program for seasonal and perishable specialty crops. It first establishes precise terms: what counts as the seasonal marketing window; how the program computes an “effective price” (the national average received during that window); and how it computes a 5‑year “reference price” by averaging national prices but removing the single highest and lowest seasons.
The statute limits covered crops to a defined list of perishable, raw-marketed items and requires the Secretary to map the geographic regions and windows where those crops are marketed.
To trigger payments for a marketing year the Secretary must find two things: the effective price is below the reference price for that crop, and the price shortfall is caused by imports. Where triggers are met, the payment rate per unit equals the difference between the reference and effective prices.
The producer’s payment equals that per-unit rate multiplied by the producer’s 5‑year average production for the seasonal marketing window, with the producer’s single highest and lowest production years excluded from the average.The bill sets participant eligibility requirements: applicants must file USDA applications with whatever information the Secretary requires, show average adjusted gross income under $5 million across the three prior tax years, and derive at least 75% of adjusted gross income from farming, ranching, or forestry. The pilot’s life is limited — it sunsets five years after enactment — and the statute authorizes an annual appropriation to fund the pilot for each fiscal year during that period.Operationally, USDA must do several technically demanding tasks: define seasonal marketing windows by region, calculate national average price series for short windows of perishable crops (which often have thin or fragmented price reporting), determine whether imports were the cause of a price decline in a given marketing year, and process producer applications and production averages that exclude outlier years.
Those implementation choices will shape who receives payments and how predictable the program is for growers and markets.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The statute lists five covered crops by name: asparagus, bell peppers, blueberries, cucumbers, and squash — limited to crops marketed raw and normally sold within four weeks of harvest.
A payment is triggered only when the national average market price during the crop’s seasonal marketing window (the effective price) is less than the 5‑year trimmed reference price, and the Secretary finds imports caused the price decline.
Eligibility requires an average adjusted gross income below $5,000,000 over the three prior tax years and at least 75% of adjusted gross income derived from farming, ranching, or forestry.
Producer payments equal (reference price − effective price) × the producer’s 5‑year average production for the seasonal window, where the producer’s single highest and single lowest production years are excluded from that average.
The pilot is time-limited and budgeted: it terminates five years after enactment and the bill authorizes $200 million per fiscal year to carry out the pilot during that period.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definitions and scope
This provision defines the program’s key measurement concepts — “effective price,” “reference price,” “seasonal and perishable crop,” and “seasonal marketing window.” By prescribing national average price measures and a 5‑year trimmed average for the reference price, the statute fixes the mathematical building blocks for payment triggers. Practically, these definitions force USDA to choose specific national price series and to publish the geographic windows it will treat as the market seasons for each listed crop.
Pilot triggers and geographic coverage
The Secretary must start the pilot with marketing year 2025 and may provide payments to producers in any geographical region where a listed crop is grown during a defined seasonal window. Payments are payable only when two factual predicates exist in a marketing year: the effective price is below the reference price, and imports caused the shortfall. That causation requirement imports a discretionary investigative task for USDA — it is not an automatic statistical rule — and will require a methodology for linking import flows and price movements.
Producer application and eligibility criteria
USDA must require applications and supporting information from producers. The section imposes two objective eligibility screens: a three-year average adjusted gross income cap ($5 million) and a farm-dependency test (75% of adjusted gross from farming, ranching, or forestry). These thresholds narrow the program to farms that are both not very large by AGI and economically dependent on agriculture for the bulk of household income, which will matter in outreach and verification.
Payment calculation mechanics
Payment amount is the product of a per-unit payment rate and a producer’s 5‑year trimmed production average. The per-unit payment equals the gap between the reference price and the effective price. By trimming both price and production series (excluding the single highest and single lowest years), the statute smooths out outlier seasons but also reduces responsiveness to rapid production changes; that choice affects payment magnitudes and how quickly assistance follows a shock.
Sunset and funding
The pilot automatically terminates five years after enactment, forcing a statutory evaluation point. Congress authorized $200 million per fiscal year for each year the pilot is in effect. That annual authorization establishes an explicit budget envelope, which will cap program scale unless further appropriations authorizations or allocations change it.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Agriculture across all five countries.
Explore Agriculture in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Producers of covered seasonal specialty crops (asparagus, bell peppers, blueberries, cucumbers, squash): receive direct price-gap payments when USDA finds import-driven price losses, providing targeted cash flow relief during time-critical marketing windows.
- Regionally concentrated small and medium specialty‑crop farms that meet the AGI and farm-dependency tests: the income and dependency screens prioritize farms that rely on production for household income and are not very large by AGI, improving the chance that smaller, family-operated growers receive support.
- Local harvest-and-shipment supply chain participants (packers, short‑haul distributors, regional wholesalers): by stabilizing grower revenues for targeted crops, the program can reduce immediate supplier insolvency risk and help maintain short-season processing and logistics capacity.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal taxpayers and appropriators: the program is authorized at $200 million per fiscal year, which is an explicit recurring appropriation pressure while the pilot runs and will compete with other USDA spending priorities.
- USDA program and data units: USDA must assemble national, seasonally segmented price series, determine import causation, manage applications, and calculate trimmed production averages — tasks that create administrative cost and require technical capacity.
- Producers of non-covered crops and producers above the AGI or dependency thresholds: these actors receive no relief while facing the same market exposure, and could press politically for inclusion or for alternative programs; processors and buyers could face higher procurement prices if payments push growers to maintain production despite low market demand.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether targeted, discretionary payments tied to import causation are the right instrument to protect short‑window specialty crops without creating perverse incentives or significant administrative contention. The bill seeks to deliver quick, crop‑specific relief to reliant growers, but it does so by handing USDA broad analytic discretion and by using national price measures that may poorly reflect regional, time-sensitive markets — trading program responsiveness and simplicity for potential errors in targeting and taxpayer exposure.
The bill creates multiple implementation choke points. First, the causation standard — that imports must have caused the price decline — vests significant discretionary and analytic responsibility in USDA.
The statute does not prescribe a specific econometric test, temporal lag structure, or import‑flow threshold, so USDA will need to build and defend a methodology that links import volumes/prices to domestic price movements within short seasonal windows. That choice will determine which years and regions qualify and will be a likely target for administrative review and stakeholder challenge.
Second, the use of national average prices and trimmed 5‑year averages smooths volatility but may mismatch local market realities for crops that trade in short regional windows. Perishable specialty crops often have localized over-supply episodes that do not show up in national series, so the national effective/reference approach could either under‑target real regional distress or overpay where national averages moved for unrelated reasons.
Lastly, the program’s fixed list of five crops, income and dependency screens, and a five‑year sunset create distribution and equity questions: growers just above the AGI cap or raising similar but non-covered crops will be left out, potentially prompting calls for expansion or replacement programs once the pilot ends.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.