The bill requires the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library to obtain a statue of Clarence Mitchell, Jr. and place it in a permanent public location within the United States Capitol. It includes a series of findings summarizing Mitchell’s career as the NAACP Washington Bureau director and notes his receipt of the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
Practically, the measure creates a near-term procurement and curatorial obligation for the Joint Committee (with an express option to delegate contracting to the Architect of the Capitol) and authorizes whatever federal funds are necessary to complete the work. For agencies and officers who manage Capitol art and space, this bill imposes discrete project, budgetary, and placement decisions without detailed procedural rules in the text.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill directs the Joint Committee on the Library to enter into an agreement to obtain a statue of Clarence Mitchell, Jr. within two years of enactment, permits the Joint Committee to authorize the Architect of the Capitol to contract on its behalf, and requires the statue be placed in a permanent public location in the U.S. Capitol. It also authorizes appropriation of "such sums as may be necessary," with funds remaining available until expended.
Who It Affects
Primary operational responsibility falls to the Joint Committee on the Library and, if delegated, the Architect of the Capitol and its procurement and curatorial offices. Secondary stakeholders include sculptors/artists, the NAACP and civil-rights organizations, Capitol curators, and taxpayers through federal appropriations.
Why It Matters
This is a narrow, legislated commemoration that creates immediate procurement, funding, and placement obligations within the federal art and facilities apparatus. Because the bill supplies few procedural details, it shifts significant discretionary choices—artist selection, contracting approach, exact siting, and budget management—to the Joint Committee and the Architect of the Capitol.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act is short and tightly focused: Congress expresses its findings about Clarence Mitchell, Jr. — his Baltimore roots, work as an NAACP Washington Bureau director from 1950–1978, extensive congressional testimony, and recognition with the Presidential Medal of Freedom — and then instructs the Joint Committee on the Library to obtain a statue of him for the Capitol. The operative section sets a clear administrative trigger: an agreement to obtain the statue must be in place within two years of enactment, but the bill does not prescribe who picks the artist, how the work is to be funded beyond open-ended appropriations language, or how the subject’s likeness will be approved.
To implement the mandate the Joint Committee can either manage the process directly or authorize the Architect of the Capitol to execute the agreement and related contracts on its behalf. That delegation option is important: the Architect already runs procurement for Capitol art, handles installation logistics, and maintains the Capitol’s public spaces.
Delegation therefore channels the project into existing procurement and curatorial pipelines, but the bill leaves the timing, procurement method (e.g., competition vs. direct commission), and donor or artist-selection protocols to those offices.The placement requirement is similarly concise: once obtained, the statue must be placed in a permanent public location in the United States Capitol. The bill does not define criteria for what qualifies as ‘permanent’ or ‘public location,’ nor does it address whether existing statues might be moved or whether this statue will join a particular collection area (such as Statuary Hall or another corridor).
Funding is authorized as “such sums as may be necessary,” and any appropriated amounts will remain available until expended, which removes routine fiscal-year timing pressure but leaves total cost and fiscal prioritization to appropriations processes.Because the bill is procedural rather than prescriptive about aesthetics, selection, donor contributions, and installation logistics, most implementation questions will be answered through the Joint Committee’s directions and the Architect’s contracting practices. That means the practical workload touches procurement officers (for contracting an artist or foundry), curators (for siting and interpretive text), facilities staff (for installation and ongoing maintenance), and appropriators (who must provide the funding).
The statute creates a clear mandate with flexible execution, concentrating substantive choices in a small set of administrative actors rather than spelling out public or competitive processes.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Joint Committee on the Library must enter into an agreement to obtain a statue of Clarence Mitchell, Jr. not later than two years after enactment.
The bill authorizes the Joint Committee to delegate contracting authority to the Architect of the Capitol, who may execute the agreement and related contracts on the Committee’s behalf.
The statute requires placement of the acquired statue in a permanent public location in the United States Capitol but does not define 'permanent' or identify specific rooms or halls.
Appropriations are authorized in open-ended terms—'such sums as may be necessary'—and any amounts appropriated 'shall remain available until expended.', The bill records findings about Mitchell’s career, including his tenure as NAACP Washington Bureau director (1950–1978), his role in advancing major civil-rights laws, and his 1980 Presidential Medal of Freedom.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Designates the Act as the 'Clarence Mitchell, Jr. Statue Act.' This is a naming provision only and has no operational effect, but it clarifies the bill’s singular purpose for statutes and legislative records.
Findings on Clarence Mitchell, Jr.
Lists biographical and historical findings: Mitchell’s Baltimore origins, legal training, early journalism, leadership as NAACP Washington Bureau director from 1950–1978, extensive congressional testimony on civil-rights legislation, appointment to a U.S. delegation to the U.N., and the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1980. These findings provide the legislative rationale for the commemoration but impose no procedural requirements; they may be used by the Joint Committee and curators to craft interpretive labels or publicity around the statue.
Obtain statue—agreement and deadline
Requires the Joint Committee to enter into an agreement to obtain a statue within two years of enactment. Practically, this compels the Committee to initiate a procurement or commissioning process and set project milestones. The text does not require a competitive solicitation, set quality standards, or allocate a specific budget ceiling, so the Committee must determine procurement method, schedule, and cost estimates consistent with federal contracting rules and applicable law.
Obtain statue—delegation to Architect of the Capitol
Permits the Joint Committee to authorize the Architect of the Capitol to enter into the agreement and related contracts on the Committee’s behalf. That delegation centralizes execution with the Architect’s procurement, conservation, and installation teams, leveraging their technical expertise, but it also concentrates discretion about vendor selection, contract terms, and installation timelines in an executive agency office rather than the Committee itself.
Placement and funding
Section 3(b) requires that the statue be placed in a permanent public location in the Capitol; Section 3(c) authorizes 'such sums as may be necessary' and makes appropriated funds available until expended. Those provisions create binding placement and funding authorities while leaving granular choices—exact siting, interpretive signage, conservation responsibilities, and total appropriated amount—to subsequent administrative and appropriations actions.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Civil-rights historians and educators: The statue formalizes Congress’s recognition of Mitchell’s role, providing a tangible exhibit for teaching and public programming in the Capitol.
- Communities connected to Mitchell’s life (Baltimore, NAACP members): Institutional recognition in the Capitol elevates local and organizational histories into the national narrative and can support commemorative events.
- Visitors to the U.S. Capitol and the public: A new, permanent public exhibit expands the Capitol’s representational diversity and adds to interpretive content for tours and displays.
- NAACP and allied civil-rights organizations: The statutory findings and placement provide institutional validation that can be used in outreach, fundraising, and legacy preservation efforts.
Who Bears the Cost
- Joint Committee on the Library: Responsible for initiating the agreement and making discretionary choices about procurement approach, siting, and delegation—tasks that consume staff time and committee resources.
- Architect of the Capitol and related offices: If delegated, the Architect must manage contracting, conservation, installation, and potentially ongoing maintenance—functions that require budget, procurement bandwidth, and curatorial attention.
- Federal appropriations/taxpayers: Funding is open-ended and must ultimately be provided through the appropriations process; costs for creation, transport, installation, and long-term care will be borne by federal funds unless outside donations are arranged.
- Sculptors, foundries, and contractors: They bear the upfront burden of responding to solicitations or direct commissions and must meet federal contracting terms, scheduling, and installation constraints set by the Architect or Committee.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between the symbolic value of legislated commemoration—quickly recognizing a prominent civil-rights figure in the nation’s central ceremonial space—and the practical limits of public space, procurement integrity, and public accountability: honoring a legacy requires choices about funds, siting, and artists that inevitably compete with other uses of Capitol resources and that the bill leaves largely to administrative discretion.
The bill creates a firm political and administrative command—obtain and place a statue—while leaving key execution details unspecified. The gap between mandate and mechanics raises questions about procurement method (competitive competition versus direct commission), intellectual-property and likeness approvals, donor involvement, and whether the Committee or Architect will establish a public process for artist selection.
The open-ended appropriation authorization removes immediate fiscal-year constraints but places the project in competition with other priorities during the appropriations cycle; it also creates uncertainty about total cost exposure until appropriations are enacted.
Placement language obligates a 'permanent public location' but does not define what that means in practice. The Capitol has finite space and complex curatorial rules; adding a statue may require moving or reclassifying existing works and engaging multiple offices (capitol curator, preservation, security).
The statute’s delegation option favors administrative efficiency but concentrates discretionary authority, which could mute public input and produce local disputes about siting or inscription. Finally, the bill sets a two-year procurement horizon that may be optimistic given artwork design, foundry timelines, and federal contracting procedures, potentially pressuring agencies to take expedited routes that reduce competitive sourcing or public engagement.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.