The FLARE Act amends Section 33 of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2229) to add statutory definitions for “lithium‑ion cell or battery” and “thermal runaway,” to explicitly include lithium‑ion cells and batteries within the Act’s authorized activities, and to authorize funding for programs that suppress fires resulting from thermal runaway. The change is targeted: it clarifies which battery chemistries the fire programs should prioritize and expands the scope of federal support available to firefighters.
This matters for fire departments, federal grant administrators, and suppliers of specialized suppression tools because it converts an operational problem—battery fires—into an express subject of federally authorized programs and funding. The amendment creates a statutory basis for federal grants, training, and procurement aimed at the particular hazard of thermal runaway, which may change local investment priorities and influence standards used in emergency response and equipment acquisition.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill inserts two new definitions into 15 U.S.C. 2229 and amends the list of authorized activities to expressly cover lithium‑ion cells or batteries and the suppression of fires caused by thermal runaway. It also adds a funding authorization line to permit federal programs to support thermal‑runaway suppression efforts.
Who It Affects
Local and state fire departments, volunteer fire companies, the U.S. Fire Administration and FEMA grant programs, training academies, and vendors of firefighting and suppression equipment. It will also be relevant to organizations that draft firefighter training curricula and local emergency planners.
Why It Matters
By codifying definitions and a funding purpose, the bill makes thermal‑runaway response an explicit federal priority and unlocks grant justification for specialized tools and training. That statutory signal can steer technical standards, procurement decisions, and grant award criteria even though the bill does not itself prescribe specific technologies or protocols.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The FLARE Act makes three narrow but consequential edits to the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act. First, it adds a statutory definition of “lithium‑ion cell or battery” that focuses on rechargeable electrochemical cells without metallic lithium in either electrode, while expressly excluding cells or batteries described in two specific subparts of 49 C.F.R. §173.185.
Second, it defines “thermal runaway” as the uncontrolled temperature rise in cells or batteries caused by exothermic reactions. Those two definitions set the boundaries for what federal fire programs should treat as the covered hazard.
Third, the Act expands the enumerated activities under Section 33 to explicitly include lithium‑ion cells or batteries and to add suppression of fires resulting from thermal runaway to the list of authorized program objectives. Practically, that change gives federal grantmakers a statutory basis to prioritize funding for procurement of suppression tools, specialized training, research into mitigation techniques, and other programmatic responses tailored to battery fire dynamics.Although the bill does not allocate a specific sum or detail the technologies to be procured, it inserts a funding purpose into the statute—authorizing programs to suppress thermal‑runaway fires—so the U.S. Fire Administration and other grant administrators can justify awards for those items.
Implementation will require agencies to translate the statutory language into grant criteria, eligible cost categories, and program guidance, and to coordinate with existing federal rules that govern the transportation and handling of lithium batteries.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds a statutory definition of “lithium‑ion cell or battery” to 15 U.S.C. 2229 and excludes cells or batteries described in subsections (c) and (g)(2) of 49 C.F.R. §173.185.
The bill defines “thermal runaway” as an uncontrolled increase of cell temperature caused by exothermic reactions inside cells and batteries.
The bill amends the Act’s authorized activities to explicitly include lithium‑ion cells or batteries and adds “suppressing fires resulting from thermal runaway” to the list of purposes federal programs may pursue.
The bill inserts a new funding purpose into subsection (d)(3) of 15 U.S.C. 2229 authorizing programs to fund suppression of thermal‑runaway fires.
The statutory changes do not appropriate money or prescribe specific suppression technologies; they create legal authority for federal grants, training, and equipment purchases targeted at thermal‑runaway incidents.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title — FLARE Act
Provides the Act’s short title, the Firefighter Lithium‑ion Awareness and Readiness Enhancement Act (FLARE Act). This is purely formal but signals the statute’s subject and intent for implementing agencies and stakeholders.
Adds definitions for 'lithium‑ion cell or battery' and 'thermal runaway'
The bill inserts a targeted chemical definition into the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act that centers on rechargeable cells without metallic lithium in electrodes, and it adds a technical definition of thermal runaway. The exclusion of cells described in 49 C.F.R. §173.185(c) and (g)(2) narrows statutory coverage; agencies will need to interpret which real‑world batteries fall on either side of that line when designing programs and grant eligibility.
Expands authorized program activities to cover lithium‑ion and thermal‑runaway suppression
The bill revises the statute’s list of activities that federal fire programs may engage in by explicitly naming lithium‑ion cells and batteries and adding suppression of thermal‑runaway fires. That change converts a descriptive problem into an express statutory priority, enabling program managers to build eligible activities and evaluation criteria around that hazard.
Authorizes funding for thermal‑runaway suppression programs
A new subparagraph authorizes the Act’s funding to be used for programs that suppress fires caused by thermal runaway. While the bill does not appropriate funds or set grant mechanics, it clears a statutory obstacle that might have limited federal support for equipment, training, or small‑scale demonstration projects addressing battery fires.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Transportation across all five countries.
Explore Transportation in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Local fire departments and volunteer fire companies — They gain a clearer statutory basis to apply for federal grants to acquire specialized suppression equipment, training, or pilot programs addressing lithium‑ion fires.
- U.S. Fire Administration and FEMA grant administrators — The statute gives program managers explicit authority to prioritize thermal‑runaway response in grant guidance and award decisions.
- Firefighter training academies and emergency‑response curriculum developers — Federal support can be steered toward new curricula and certification modules focused on battery fire dynamics and suppression tactics.
- Manufacturers and vendors of suppression technology — Firms that make containment systems, specialized extinguishing agents, or thermal‑runaway mitigation tools may see more procurement opportunities from grant‑funded purchases.
- Communities with high concentrations of battery‑powered assets (e.g., EV fleets, warehousing with large battery storage) — Those jurisdictions can seek federal assistance to build tactical capacity against a specific, high‑risk hazard.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal agencies (USFA/FEMA) — Agencies must develop program guidance, eligibility criteria, and oversight mechanisms to implement the new funding purpose, which requires administrative effort and possible resource reallocation.
- Grant applicants with limited grantwriting capacity — Small or volunteer departments may face competitive disadvantages when applying for new, potentially technical grants without outside support.
- Procurement officers and local governments — If jurisdictions choose to pursue new suppression options, they will need to plan for acquisition, training, maintenance, and lifecycle costs for unfamiliar equipment.
- Manufacturers outside the defined battery class — Firms producing suppression products for excluded chemistries may not benefit, and the statutory definition could reorient demand toward technologies designed for the specified lithium‑ion class.
- Taxpayers/federal budget — While the bill authorizes funding purposes, any expanded grant activity will require appropriations; broader program scope could increase future federal spending pressures.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether to target limited federal resources at a narrowly defined, technically specific hazard—thermal runaway in a subset of lithium‑ion batteries—or to keep programs broader and technology‑agnostic; focusing resources makes federal support more visible and actionable for that risk, but it risks leaving out related chemistries, creating administrative complexity, and requiring agencies to pick winners without clear technical standards.
The bill is narrowly drafted to change statutory authorization and definitions rather than to set technical standards or appropriate funds. That narrowness creates a common implementation challenge: agencies will have to translate broad statutory language—“tools to suppress fires resulting from thermal runaway”—into concrete eligible costs, technical specifications, and outcome metrics without guidance from Congress on preferred technologies or performance thresholds.
The omission raises questions about how to measure success, what equipment meets the implicit standard, and how to handle maintenance, training, and interoperability across jurisdictions.
Another unresolved question is the scope created by the definition of “lithium‑ion cell or battery” and the express exclusion of cells described in 49 C.F.R. §173.185(c) and (g)(2). That cross‑reference relies on existing Department of Transportation regulatory text to carve out coverage; in practice, agencies and applicants will need to map battery inventories against those regulatory subsections to determine eligibility.
Finally, because the bill does not appropriate funds, its practical effect depends on future budget actions: the statutory authority may enable programs but will only change outcomes if appropriations and administrative capacity follow.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.