The bill amends the Higher Education Act to stop interest from accruing on federal student loans and to refinance eligible non‑federally held student loans into federal Direct Consolidation Loans with no interest or origination fee. It sets July 1, 2026 as the effective date for interest elimination and allows borrowers to opt out of automatic modifications or refinancings.
The bill also establishes an Education Affordability Trust Fund that receives all loan repayments, invests those funds under a new six‑member board, and transfers investment returns back to the Department of Education to finance zero‑interest lending and limited supplemental Pell awards.
Why it matters: the bill combines a near‑complete removal of interest on federal student borrowing with a statutory financing mechanism intended to make that change self‑funding. Operationally this creates a large administrative effort—automatic loan modifications, a new consolidation pathway, special rules for counting past payments toward forgiveness, and a federally managed investment vehicle with governance and reporting requirements.
The structure also shifts credit risk and program design issues from the loan market to a centralized Trust Fund and its investment strategy.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires the Secretary to modify existing eligible Federal Direct Loans so no interest accrues beginning July 1, 2026, and to refinance eligible loans held outside the Department into Federal Direct Consolidation Loans with 0% interest and no origination fee. It makes new Direct loans first disbursed on or after July 1, 2026 interest‑free, and ends the authority to make interest‑subsidized Stafford loans after June 30, 2026.
Who It Affects
Direct loan borrowers and borrowers holding FFEL/other federally‑related loans not held by the Department; holders of those non‑federal loans who will be paid off; the Department of Education and federal loan servicers that must carry out automatic modifications and new reporting; and investors and institutions that interact with the new Education Affordability Trust Fund.
Why It Matters
If enacted, the bill removes a primary revenue stream (interest) from federal higher education lending and replaces it with an investment‑backed Trust Fund model that must deliver returns to cover administrative costs and additional Pell spending; this alters the fiscal mechanics of federal student aid and creates governance, accounting, and implementation challenges for program administrators.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates three interlocking changes to federal student lending. First, for existing loans held by the Department, it requires the Secretary to modify loan terms so no interest accrues starting July 1, 2026.
Those modifications are automatic but borrowers may opt out at any time. Second, for loans made, insured, or guaranteed under earlier FFEL, Perkins‑type, or certain health‑service programs that are not held by the Department, the Secretary must offer a refinancing route: the Department issues a Federal Direct Consolidation Loan equal to the outstanding principal, accrued interest, and late charges, pays the non‑federal holder to discharge the old loan, and treats the result as a Direct Consolidation Loan with no interest and no origination fee.
The statute preserves borrower access to earlier forgiveness or benefits if those benefits are more generous than the consolidation terms and prohibits automatic lengthening of repayment terms; borrowers can still elect different repayment plans voluntarily.
The bill also inserts a set of special counting rules for consolidation: when multiple component loans are consolidated, the Department must calculate a weighted count of qualifying monthly payments from the pre‑consolidation history so that borrowers do not lose credit toward income‑driven repayment forgiveness or other time‑based relief. That calculation requires identifying each component loan, computing its weighted share of the consolidated balance, multiplying that weight by the number of qualifying payments on that component, summing the results, and rounding to the nearest whole number; the Department must report these figures to borrowers and to authorizing committees annually, including delinquency counts for modified/refinanced loans.To finance and institutionalize zero‑interest lending, the bill establishes the Education Affordability Trust Fund.
All loan repayments are deposited into the Trust Fund without further appropriation. A six‑member, Senate‑confirmed Board governs investments and appoints independent fund managers.
The Board must adopt investment guidelines unanimously; fund managers must invest in a limited universe of bonds subject to rating, diversification, country‑sanctions, and concentration limits. The statutory language directs the Trust Fund to transfer assets (investment returns) back to the Department for administrative costs and making zero‑interest loans, and it authorizes the Secretary to use excess returns for supplemental Pell grants and a targeted student success grant program subject to tuition‑growth and endowment size limits.
The bill includes reporting, audit, and disclosure rules, and it allows the Secretary to waive certain procedural requirements (master calendar and negotiated rulemaking) to implement the changes more quickly.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Beginning July 1, 2026 the Secretary must modify eligible Federal Direct Loans so no interest accrues, but each borrower may opt out of that modification at any time.
The Secretary must refinance eligible non‑Department loans by issuing a Federal Direct Consolidation Loan equal to unpaid principal plus accrued interest and late charges, charge no origination fee, and prohibit interest on the new consolidation loan.
Loans first disbursed or applied for on or after July 1, 2026 — including Direct Unsubsidized Stafford, PLUS, and Direct Consolidation Loans — have an applicable interest rate of 0%.
All amounts repaid on federal student loans are deposited into a newly created Education Affordability Trust Fund; a six‑member, Presidentially appointed and Senate‑confirmed Board governs investments and appoints fund managers, and the Board must adopt investment guidelines by unanimous vote.
If Trust Fund investment returns exceed Department costs, the Secretary may use excess assets for: (1) supplemental Pell Grants targeted proportionally to existing Pell recipients, and (2) competitive grants under a Postsecondary Student Success Program that satisfy tuition growth and endowment size conditions, with required congressional reporting within 180 days.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Automatic loan modifications and refinancing into Direct Consolidation Loans
Section 460A requires the Secretary to modify eligible Direct Loans so interest stops accruing beginning July 1, 2026, and to offer automatic refinancing for eligible non‑federally held loans by issuing Federal Direct Consolidation Loans equal to unpaid principal, accrued interest, and late charges. The provision explicitly allows borrowers to opt out of either modification or refinancing at any time. Practical implications: servicers must implement bulk modifications, update billing and payoff systems, and notify borrowers; holders of non‑federal loans will be paid off and will lose future interest streams but receive payoff proceeds. The statute also bans origination fees on consolidation under this subsection and forbids automatic extension of repayment periods while preserving borrower options to choose different payment plans.
Special repayment‑count rules to preserve qualifying payments
The bill adds precise rules for treating pre‑consolidation payments as qualifying toward forgiveness or income‑driven repayment counts. The Department must identify each 'component loan,' compute a weighted factor representing that loan's share of the consolidated balance, multiply the weight by the number of qualifying payments previously made on that component, sum the results across component loans, round to the nearest whole number, and treat the total as the number of qualifying payments on the new consolidation loan. The requirement also appears across multiple repayment provisions so that refinanced borrowers remain eligible for income‑driven plans and forgiveness treatments without losing earned credit, but it imposes data‑reconciliation tasks on the Department and servicers.
0% interest on new loans, end of interest‑subsidized Stafford loans, and inflation indexing for limits
The bill makes the applicable interest rate 0% for Direct Unsubsidized Stafford Loans, Direct PLUS Loans, and Direct Consolidation Loans first disbursed or applied for on or after July 1, 2026. It terminates the authority to make new interest‑subsidized Stafford Loans for periods of instruction beginning on or after July 1, 2026 and directs adjustment of annual and aggregate Direct Unsubsidized limits for inflation beginning July 1, 2027 using the Consumer Price Index. Practically, this replaces subsidized borrowing with an expanded unsubsidized regime and indexes loan caps to inflation going forward.
Education Affordability Trust Fund: funding, transfers, and governance
All loan repayments are to be deposited into the Education Affordability Trust Fund without further appropriation. The Board governs the Trust Fund: six members appointed by the President with Senate confirmation, six‑year staggered terms, post‑employment and lobbying restrictions, mandatory financial disclosure, and a requirement that investment guidelines be adopted by unanimous vote. The Board appoints fund managers; fund managers must invest primarily in bonds with explicit rating floors and concentration limits and prioritize short maturities during the first 10 years. The Trust Fund transfers investment assets back to the Department to cover administrative costs and to make zero‑interest loans according to a tiered transfer schedule tied to 'assets' thresholds; excess returns may fund supplemental Pell grants and competitive grants with institutional eligibility conditions. The Board must audit annually and report to Congress, and the fund must follow specified accrual accounting rules.
Implementation flexibility for the Secretary
The Secretary may waive master calendar requirements and negotiated rulemaking provisions in order to implement the bill’s amendments. That expedites implementation but reduces procedural input from stakeholders that those processes typically provide. Agencies and institutions that normally rely on negotiated rulemaking will have fewer formal opportunities to shape operational rules.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Education across all five countries.
Explore Education in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Borrowers with existing Direct Loans — they receive an immediate stop to interest accrual on modified loans starting July 1, 2026, which reduces carrying costs and can lower monthly payments or shorten repayment horizons depending on borrower choices.
- Borrowers holding non‑Department (FFEL/other) loans — they get an opportunity to convert to 0% Direct Consolidation Loans with no origination fee and a pathway to preserve previously earned forgiveness or qualifying payment credit.
- Future students — loans first disbursed on or after July 1, 2026 have 0% interest, reducing borrowing cost expectations for incoming cohorts.
- Low‑income Pell Grant recipients — the Secretary can deploy Trust Fund excess returns to provide supplemental Pell awards, increasing grant aid for recipients when the Trust Fund generates surplus returns.
- Institutions that keep tuition growth low or have smaller endowments — they become eligible for competitive Postsecondary Student Success Program grants funded by Trust Fund excesses if they meet the bill’s tuition‑growth and endowment constraints.
Who Bears the Cost
- Department of Education and loan servicers — must implement large‑scale automatic modifications and consolidations, compute weighted qualifying payment histories, update systems, and handle increased reporting and borrower communications.
- Holders of non‑Department loans (private lenders, guaranty agencies, secondary market investors) — while paid off, these holders lose future interest revenue streams and face market disruption; some business models built on interest income will be affected.
- Trust Fund Board and fund managers — carry fiduciary responsibility to generate sufficient returns under conservative rating and diversification limits, with political and legal scrutiny; poor performance shifts political pressure to appropriators.
- Taxpayers/federal balance sheet — although the bill channels repayments into a Trust Fund 'without further appropriation,' the Trust Fund’s ability to sustain zero‑interest lending depends on investment returns and statutory rules; downside risks could translate into budgetary exposure or program scaling if returns are inadequate.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is reconciling two legitimate goals that pull in different directions: deliver broad, durable borrower relief by eliminating interest, while preventing open‑ended fiscal exposure. The bill tries to solve that by creating a bond‑backed Trust Fund to finance zero‑interest lending, but the conservative investment rules needed to protect capital will suppress returns and make it harder for the Trust Fund to sustain the program without further appropriations or relaxed investment policy—so the choice is between safer investments that may not generate enough revenue, or riskier investments that threaten the Fund’s capital and political viability.
The bill attempts to pair broad borrower relief with a self‑funding investment model, but it leaves several operational and fiscal questions unresolved. First, the Trust Fund’s statutory investment constraints—high rating floors, limits on domestic Treasury holdings, and caps on corporate and international bond shares—prioritize capital preservation but limit expected returns.
Those lower returns make it harder for the Trust Fund to produce the revenue stream needed to underwrite a permanent 0% interest loan program and supplemental Pell spending without future appropriations. Second, the statutory treatment of 'assets' and the thresholds used to determine transfers to the Department are internally inconsistent: some provisions use thresholds in the hundreds of millions while others refer to hundreds of billions.
That drafting mismatch will require clarification to avoid misunderstandings about when and how transfers or emergency governance triggers apply.
Implementation complexity is another practical risk. Automatically modifying millions of loans and reconciling component payment histories for consolidated accounts requires high‑quality, legacy data and close coordination with servicers and private holders who must be paid out.
The bill’s weighted calculation for qualifying payments is precise but administratively intensive and depends on complete historical records; errors could affect borrowers’ eligibility for forgiveness or misstate counts in required annual reports. Governance rules create their own tensions: requiring unanimous Board approval for investment guidelines concentrates power and risks gridlock, while post‑employment and lobbying bans narrow the candidate pool for experienced managers.
Finally, while the bill prohibits origination fees and preserves some borrower protections, it ends subsidized Stafford lending and shifts borrowing into unsubsidized channels, which could raise net borrowing levels for students who previously relied on subsidies.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.