Codify — Article

Permanent Housing Affordability Act expands shared-equity homeownership

Creates federal grant and loan programs, surplus‑land conveyance rules, and research/outreach to scale community land trusts and resale-restricted homeownership.

The Brief

The Permanent Housing Affordability Act is a statutory package designed to grow permanently affordable, owner-occupied housing by directing federal resources toward shared‑equity models such as community land trusts and limited-equity cooperatives. It creates a Treasury-administered grant program to seed revolving loan funds that provide low-interest construction capital, a HUD pilot that buys land or properties for resale‑restricted homes, a research and outreach program, and a change to federal surplus‑land policy to enable direct conveyances to shared‑equity entities.

For practitioners, the bill signals three practical shifts: the federal government will subsidize construction financing for nonprofit and public shared‑equity providers; it will prioritize long-duration affordability (via deed/lease restrictions) as a program goal; and it will remove a legal obstacle to convey federal surplus land to community land trusts. It also layers reporting and technical assistance requirements onto grantees and recipients so agencies and Congress can track outcomes.

At a Glance

What It Does

Establishes (1) a Treasury grant program that funds local revolving loan funds to make low‑interest construction loans to nonprofit and public shared‑equity developers; (2) a HUD pilot that purchases land or properties for resale‑restricted owner‑occupied homes; (3) research, outreach, and technical assistance; and (4) an amendment allowing surplus federal land to be conveyed to community land trusts with deep discounts and deed conditions.

Who It Affects

Directly affects community land trusts, limited‑equity cooperatives, nonprofit developers, state and local housing authorities, certified community development financial institutions, and lenders that underwrite mortgages on resale‑restricted homes. Indirectly affects appraisers, secondary mortgage market actors, and municipal land‑use planners.

Why It Matters

It treats shared‑equity homeownership as an explicit federal housing strategy and backs it with capital, land policy, and capacity building—tools that communities have lacked. That combination could materially lower the cost barrier to creating permanently affordable ownership units, but it also raises questions about financing, appraisal, and how long‑term resale limits interact with mortgage markets.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill starts by defining key terms that govern eligibility and program design: community land trusts must be nonprofit or public entities whose primary purpose is to provide permanently affordable housing, and shared‑equity homeownership models are resale‑restricted, owner‑occupied programs that lock in long‑term affordability through ground leases, deed covenants, or similar mechanisms. The statute explicitly ties permissible resale formulas to the existing regulatory standard in 24 C.F.R. 92.254(a)(5)(i)(A) as of March 28, 2025, and defines a “qualified homebuyer” as a household at or below 120 percent of area median income.

Under the Treasury program (called the Lasting Home Affordability Fund), Treasury will award grants to eligible grantees (states, state‑chartered authorities, or certified CDFIs). Grantees must use these grants to create revolving funds that make construction loans to eligible entities—local governments, public instrumentalities, or nonprofit shared‑equity providers—on a rolling basis.

Loans must carry an interest rate no higher than 3 percent and an origination fee no higher than 1 percent; grantees may not require more than 10 percent of the loan amount in liquid assets from borrowers and may not lend to themselves. Grantees must prioritize projects in high cost‑burden, high‑risk, or redlined areas and projects where affordability terms exceed 99 years.

Treasury imposes annual reporting requirements on grantees to capture loan counts, recipient types, ZIP Code locations, AMI levels served, resale formulas used, and other operational metrics.Separately, HUD must run a pilot that awards grants directly to eligible entities to buy vacant land or existing properties for development or rehabilitation and resale under resale‑restricted mechanisms. The pilot prioritizes projects that lock in longer affordability.

Homes developed with pilot funds must be marketed to households at or below 80 percent of AMI (with an up to 120 percent AMI cap for rural locations) and must be built or made sale‑ready within three years of acquisition, subject to Secretary‑approved extensions for documented delays. HUD’s pilot carries reporting requirements (unit counts, median purchase price, down‑payment averages, tenure, delinquency rates, resident fees) and authorizes multi‑year appropriations with a set aside for technical assistance.To address land supply, the bill amends the federal surplus real property statute to allow GSA (the Administrator) to convey surplus properties to community land trusts and shared‑equity models with deed conditions that preserve trust use in perpetuity and a valuation rule that permits a baseline 75 percent discount from market value (with authority for a larger discount if justified).

Finally, the bill funds PD&R research, technical assistance, and a public awareness campaign aimed at lenders, counselors, and the public; it also requires annual reporting to Congress across these programs so policymakers can track outputs and geographic distribution.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The Treasury program requires construction loans to carry an interest rate of no more than 3 percent and an origination fee of no more than 1 percent.

2

The statute defines the minimum term of affordability for community land trusts and shared‑equity models as 99 years (or the longest minimum permitted under state law if state law requires a shorter term).

3

A “qualified homebuyer” for resale‑restricted units is anyone with household income at or below 120 percent of area median income.

4

The amendment to the federal surplus‑land statute directs GSA to permit a baseline discount of 75 percent off market value when conveying surplus property to a community land trust or shared‑equity entity, and allows for deeper discounts with interagency approval.

5

HUD’s pilot requires that homes financed with pilot grants be sold to households at or below 80 percent of AMI (120 percent in rural areas) and that vacant land purchases be developed and marketed for sale within three years unless the Secretary grants an extension.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 2

Definitions and eligibility rules for shared‑equity programs

▾

This section sets the program vocabulary: it narrowly defines community land trusts, eligible grantees (state agencies, state‑chartered housing authorities, and certified CDFIs), eligible entities (local governments, nonprofits, CLTs), qualified homebuyers (≤120% AMI), resale formulas (linked to 24 C.F.R. 92.254(a)(5)(i)(A)), and shared‑equity homeownership models (resale‑restricted, owner‑occupied with long‑term affordability). For implementers, this matters because the statutory definitions constrain which organizations can hold land, receive funds, and enforce long‑term covenants; the cross‑reference to an existing CFR resale formula also anchors permissible appreciation calculations to a Federal standard rather than leaving them open‑ended.

Section 3

Lasting Home Affordability Fund (Treasury grant program)

▾

Treasury must set up a grant program that funds eligible grantees, who in turn create revolving funds to make low‑interest construction loans to eligible entities. The mechanics are specific: grantees make loans at up to 3% interest with origination fees capped at 1%, cannot require more than 10% liquidity from borrowers, and may not be the borrower themselves. Grantees must prioritize projects in high‑need or displacement‑risk areas and those offering affordability longer than 99 years. Operationally, grantees shoulder loan underwriting, fund replenishment, and detailed reporting to Treasury, which creates an administrative workload and requires underwriting standards that reconcile nonprofit and public borrowers with these loan terms.

Section 4

HUD Lasting Affordability Homeownership Grant Pilot

▾

HUD’s pilot gives grants directly to eligible entities to buy vacant land or existing property for resale‑restricted owner‑occupied housing. The pilot emphasizes speed (three‑year development/sale windows with possible Secretary‑approved extensions) and income targeting (≤80% AMI, with a rural exception to ≤120% AMI). HUD must prioritize the longest affordability terms and can use up to 10% of appropriated funds for technical assistance. The statute builds in comprehensive reporting from recipients (unit counts, median prices, down payments, tenure, credit/delinquency data) so HUD and Congress can evaluate outcomes and repayment performance in real projects.

2 more sections▾
Section 5

Research, outreach, and capacity building

▾

HUD’s Office of Policy Development and Research is tasked with funding and publishing best‑practice research on community land trusts and shared‑equity models and delivering technical assistance to states, Tribes, and nonprofits. The bill also requires a public awareness campaign for lenders, housing counselors, and consumers (including coordination with the Federal Housing Finance Agency on lender education and appraisal guidance). Practically, this provision recognizes capacity and market‑acceptance barriers and aims to reduce friction that currently limits lender participation and standardization of ground leases.

Section 6

Surplus federal land conveyances to shared‑equity entities

▾

The bill amends 40 U.S.C. 550 to allow the Administrator to convey surplus real property to community land trusts or other shared‑equity models under deeds that require perpetual use for shared‑equity housing and provide Government reversion if the use lapses. It also sets valuation guidance that allows a 75% discount from market value as a baseline, with authority to go deeper. For local implementers, this creates a clear federal pathway to transfer land at steep discounts while preserving long‑term use conditions, but it also creates new appraisal and legal work to craft deeds and meet stewardship obligations.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Housing across all five countries.

Explore Housing in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Community land trusts and limited‑equity cooperatives — gain access to low‑cost construction capital, technical assistance, and a statutory route to acquire surplus federal land under long‑term use covenants.
  • Certified community development financial institutions and state housing authorities — can serve as eligible grantees to build revolving funds and expand their lending portfolios with federal seed capital and reporting support.
  • Low‑ and moderate‑income prospective homeowners — increase access to owner‑occupied housing that is kept affordable in perpetuity through resale restrictions and ground leases, reducing displacement risk in high‑cost areas.
  • Rural communities — receive program flexibility (higher AMI cap in HUD pilot) and priority consideration for geographically diverse grant awards, improving feasibility of shared‑equity models in non‑metro markets.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Eligible grantees and eligible entities — must build underwriting, loan servicing, and compliance capacity to manage revolving funds, reporting, and long‑term stewardship of covenants, which raises administrative costs and operational demands.
  • Federal agencies (Treasury, HUD, GSA/Federal Administrator) — need to stand up new programs, create guidance, and process conveyances and reports, imposing staffing and rulemaking obligations without detailed offsets in the bill.
  • Mortgage lenders and secondary market participants — will face appraisal and underwriting complexity for resale‑restricted units, which may increase transaction costs or require new product conventions to finance ground‑lease or limited‑appreciation homes.
  • Private developers and market‑rate buyers — may face increased competition for sites sold at steep discounts to CLTs and constraints when land is encumbered by perpetual covenants, potentially altering local market dynamics.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central tension is permanence versus liquidity: the bill advances long‑term, legally enforceable affordability to protect households and neighborhoods, but those same resale limits reduce market value and complicate mortgage finance and private capital deployment, forcing a choice between protecting affordability indefinitely and preserving pathways for buyer wealth accumulation and broader private investment.

The bill prioritizes permanence—many of its mechanics assume long‑term or perpetual affordability—yet permanence complicates conventional mortgage finance. Resale restrictions and ground leases depress future market resale values and yield profiles, which can make standard first‑mortgage lenders reluctant or force reliance on mission‑oriented lenders, FHA products, or customized underwriting.

The statute’s cross‑reference to an existing HUD resale‑formula regulatory standard narrows flexibility but does not resolve how Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or private secondary markets will underwrite such units at scale.

Another challenge is institutional capacity. Most community land trusts are small and operate on thin margins; the bill provides capital and TA but also attaches reporting and stewardship obligations that require administrative bandwidth.

The 75 percent baseline discount for surplus land makes acquisitions affordable but invites contentious valuation and political pushback in some localities. Implementation questions also remain: how deed reversion will be enforced, how to coordinate interagency roles (GSA conveyance with HUD valuation and Treasury funds), and whether appraisal guidance referenced in outreach will be sufficient to standardize lender practice.

Finally, the trade‑offs between locking affordability in perpetuity and enabling homeowner equity growth—critical to wealth building—are real and unresolved by the bill’s mechanics.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.