HB 820 would extend the Bottles and Breastfeeding Equipment Screening Act to require hygienic handling of breast milk and baby formula during aviation security screening by TSA personnel and private security screeners. It mandates the Transportation Security Administration to issue or update guidance within 90 days of enactment and every five years thereafter, developed in consultation with nationally recognized maternal health organizations and aligned with hygienic standards.
The bill also requires an Inspector General audit within one year to assess compliance and to examine how screening technologies affect the handling of these items.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires TSA to issue or update guidance within 90 days of enactment (and every five years thereafter) to minimize contamination of breast milk, baby formula, infant water, juice, and cooling accessories during screening. Guidance must be developed with maternal health organizations and adhere to hygienic standards, and it applies to TSA and private screening personnel under 49 U.S.C. 44920.
Who It Affects
TSA officers, private security screeners, airports, airlines, and travelers carrying breast milk or infant formula, with guidance developed in collaboration with maternal health groups.
Why It Matters
Establishes formal hygiene standards for infant nutrition items in security screening, driving safer handling, and provides measurable oversight through an IG audit to monitor compliance and technology impacts.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The act amends the Bottles and Breastfeeding Equipment Screening Act to introduce concrete hygiene requirements for items like breast milk and baby formula during aviation security screening. It directs the TSA Administrator to issue or update guidance within 90 days of enactment and then every five years, ensuring that screening practices minimize contamination of breast milk, formula, infant water, and related cooling accessories.
The guidance must be developed in consultation with nationally recognized maternal health organizations and must reflect hygienic standards. It also clarifies that these requirements extend to private security screeners operating under federal law.
Additionally, the bill mandates an Inspector General audit within one year of enactment. The audit will assess compliance with the new sections and examine how screening technologies, including bottled liquid scanners, affect the handling of breast milk, formula, and related items in the screening process, as well as the rate at which such items are denied entry into sterile areas.
The act also references the standard for what constitutes entry into sterile areas consistent with current Code of Federal Regulations. Together, these provisions create a formal mechanism to reduce contamination risk for infants’ feeding items during security screening, while providing oversight and clarity for screeners, airports, and travelers.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires TSA to issue or update hygienic handling guidance within 90 days of enactment and every five years thereafter.
Guidance must be developed with nationally recognized maternal health organizations and align with hygienic standards.
The guidance applies to TSA personnel and private security contractors under 49 U.S.C. 44920.
An Inspector General audit is due within one year to assess compliance and the impact of screening technologies on infant items.
The act amends Public Law 114-293 and is titled the Bottles and Breastfeeding Equipment Screening Enhancement Act.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
This act may be cited as the Bottles and Breastfeeding Equipment Screening Enhancement Act. This section establishes the formal title by which the statute will be referred to in law and in regulatory guidance.
Hygienic handling of breast milk and baby formula during aviation security screening
Section 3 adds a new set of requirements to minimize contamination of breast milk, baby formula, purified infant water, and related cooling and storage accessories during security screening. Not later than 90 days after enactment, the TSA Administrator must issue or update guidance for both TSA screeners and private security personnel, developed in consultation with nationally recognized maternal health organizations. The guidance must specify hygienic handling standards, ensure testing when necessary to maintain hygiene, and apply to Screeners under federal law (49 U.S.C. 44920). This targeted guidance aims to standardize practices across both government and private screening operations and incorporates specific items such as ice packs and other cooling equipment used with infant nutrition supplies.
Inspector General audit
Section 4 requires the DHS Inspector General to complete and deliver an audit within one year of enactment. The audit will assess compliance with the new sections, review the impact of various screening technologies (including bottled liquid scanners) on the handling of breast milk, baby formula, purified water for infants, and juice, and report the rate at which such items are denied entry into sterile areas as defined by federal regulations. The audit ensures accountability for implementing the hygienic handling standards and for evaluating potential efficiency or safety trade-offs.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Traveling families with infants who carry breast milk or formula will experience reduced contamination risk and clearer handling procedures during screening.
- Maternal health organizations and pediatric health groups gain formal involvement and standards for hygienic screening practices.
- TSA officers and private security screeners receive clearer, standardized hygiene protocols, reducing ambiguity and potential operational slowdowns.
- Airports and airlines benefit from more consistent screening processes and reduced risk of contamination-related disruptions.
Who Bears the Cost
- TSA and private security contractors will need to implement the new guidance, train staff, and potentially adjust procedures and equipment.
- Airport authorities and airlines may incur costs to adapt facilities, signage, and workflows to support hygienic handling practices.
- Travelers carrying breast milk or formula may experience minor delays or additional checks as new protocols are adopted.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between ensuring hygienic handling of breast milk and infant items during screening and maintaining efficient, predictable screening workflows across diverse airports and screening operators, including private contractors. Requiring consultative, standards-based guidance while using a potentially inflexible update cadence creates a risk of slow responsiveness to new evidence or technology, even as it aims to reduce contamination and protect infant health.
The bill’s approach creates genuine tensions between safety, hygiene, and operational efficiency. While standardized guidelines can reduce contamination risk, their implementation may require training, additional staff time, and potential changes to screening workflows at busy airports.
The reliance on guidance—rather than explicit performance standards—means effectiveness will hinge on how rigorously the TSA and contractors interpret and enforce the standards, and on the willingness of private screeners to adopt uniform practices across varied airport environments. The requirement to consult with maternal health organizations helps address health-focused concerns, but it also raises questions about how quickly consensus can be translated into practical procedures across all screening locations.
There are implementation questions around the interaction with existing screening technologies, such as bottled liquid scanners, and how different technologies might affect the handling of infant items. The five-year cadence for updating guidance could slow responsiveness to emerging best practices, while the one-year IG audit provides a crucial check on whether the guidance is effective in practice and how often adjustments are needed.
Finally, applying the new hygiene requirements to private security contractors under 49 U.S.C. 44920 creates a mandated standard that could require coordinated enforcement across federal and private entities.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.