Codify — Article

Bill sets Title VII (FISA) repeal to April 30, 2026

Short statutory change replaces contingent 'two years after' sunset language with a fixed April 30, 2026 repeal date and tweaks transition cross‑references.

The Brief

This bill amends the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to push the statutory repeal of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (50 U.S.C. 1881 et seq.) to a fixed calendar date: April 30, 2026. It replaces earlier contingent sunset phrasing with explicit language setting that repeal date, and it updates two transition‑procedure provisions to use the consolidated statutory citation.

The change is narrowly technical on its face: it does not rewrite Title VII’s operational limits, minimization procedures, or oversight structure. But by converting a contingent, relative sunset into a fixed date and adjusting transition wording, the bill preserves Title VII authorities through April 30, 2026 and alters the timetable on which Congress, the courts, and agencies must plan any reforms or transitions away from those authorities.

At a Glance

What It Does

The bill edits Section 403(b) of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to replace the existing 'effective two years after...' repeal trigger with an explicit repeal date of April 30, 2026, and it amends Section 404(b) to change a heading and to replace enumerated amendment references with the single citation (50 U.S.C. 1881 et seq.). It also sets the amendments to take effect on the earlier of enactment or April 19, 2026.

Who It Affects

The change directly affects agencies that rely on Title VII authorities (including collection and targeting conducted under the FISA Amendments Act), service providers subject to Section 702‑related directives, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and judges, and Congressional oversight bodies that monitor Title VII activities.

Why It Matters

By fixing a specific repeal date rather than a relative sunset, the bill removes uncertainty about when Title VII will expire and thereby extends operational continuity for intelligence collectors while compressing the legislative calendar for any substantive reforms before April 30, 2026.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

Title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (codified at 50 U.S.C. 1881 et seq.) contains the statutory authorities commonly associated with the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, including the collection authorities often described as Section 702. The bill does not change those operational statutes; instead, it edits the FISA Amendments Act’s procedural housekeeping that determines when title VII will be repealed.

Concretely, the bill amends Section 403(b) of the 2008 Act. Where the statute previously tied the repeal trigger to an event phrased as 'effective two years after' a different act, the new language substitutes a concrete calendar date: April 30, 2026.

Parallel note language in the United States Code (the 18 U.S.C. 2511 note) is similarly updated to use the same fixed date. Those textual substitutions convert a contingent sunset into a deterministic schedule.The bill also revises Section 404(b) of the 2008 Act by changing a heading that previously referenced a two‑year post‑enactment marker to the generic label 'REPEAL DATE' and by cleaning up cross‑references: rather than listing several amending acts in the statutory note, the provision now points directly to 50 U.S.C. 1881 et seq.

Finally, the enactment clause makes the amendments effective on the earlier of the date this bill becomes law or April 19, 2026, which ensures the revised repeal mechanics are in place immediately if the statute is enacted before that April date.In practical terms, the bill is an interval extension: it keeps Title VII authorities available through the specified calendar date and clarifies certain citations used in transition procedures. It leaves untouched the substantive regulatory, minimization, querying, and reporting rules embedded elsewhere in Title VII, meaning operational practices and oversight requirements remain governed by existing text unless Congress acts separately.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The bill replaces the existing 'effective two years after...' repeal trigger in Section 403(b) of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 with an explicit repeal date: April 30, 2026.

2

Parallel note language in the 18 U.S.C. 2511 note is updated to reflect the same April 30, 2026 repeal date rather than a contingent two‑year trigger.

3

Section 404(b) is amended to change its heading from a 'two years after the date of enactment' label to 'REPEAL DATE' and to simplify cross‑references to the consolidated citation (50 U.S.C. 1881 et seq.).

4

The bill’s effective date provision makes the textual changes effective on the earlier of the date of enactment or April 19, 2026, ensuring the new repeal mechanics are operative immediately if enacted before that April date.

5

The measure does not alter Title VII’s substantive authorities, minimization rules, oversight provisions, or practice standards; it only adjusts the statutory sunset and transition wording.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 1(a)

Fixes Title VII repeal language to April 30, 2026

▾

This subsection amends Section 403(b) of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008. It removes the previous contingent phrasing ('effective two years after...') and inserts a fixed repeal statement: 'effective April 30, 2026, title VII... is repealed.' The same treatment applies to the related note in 18 U.S.C. 2511. Practically, this turns a relative sunset into an absolute calendar deadline, which changes how agencies and Congress plan for continuation or termination of Title VII authorities.

Section 1(b)

Cleans up transition procedure references

▾

This subsection updates Section 404(b) by replacing a heading that referenced a 'two years after' marker with the neutral header 'REPEAL DATE' and by substituting a plain citation '(50 U.S.C. 1881 et seq.)' for a run of historical amendment references. The change is stylistic and consolidation‑oriented: it simplifies which statutory text governs transition procedures, but it may shift how courts and implementers trace historical amendments when resolving interpretive questions.

Section 1(c)

Effective date — immediate if enacted before April 19, 2026

▾

The bill states the amendments take effect on the earlier of the enactment date or April 19, 2026. That clause ensures the new repeal mechanics are in place immediately upon enactment if Congress acts prior to April 19, 2026; otherwise the statutory change remains scheduled to take effect no later than April 19, 2026. The provision prevents a gap between passage and statutory operation for planning purposes.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Privacy across all five countries.

Explore Privacy in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Federal intelligence agencies (e.g., NSA, CIA, FBI): The fixed repeal date preserves Title VII collection authorities through April 30, 2026, allowing ongoing operations that rely on those authorities to continue without interruption while Congress considers longer‑term changes.
  • Executive Branch legal and program offices (DOJ, ODNI): Legal clarity on the repeal timetable reduces immediate operational and legal uncertainty, easing near‑term planning for compliance, reporting, and programmatic continuity.
  • Operational collection teams and cleared contractors: Teams that implement Title VII collection and processing avoid abrupt operational changes or shutdowns tied to a contingent sunset, reducing short‑term operational disruption.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Privacy and civil liberties organizations: The extension delays any statutory expiration that would force substantive reconsideration of Title VII mechanics, imposing an opportunity cost on advocates seeking immediate reform.
  • Communications providers and compliance officers: Providers remain subject to Section 702‑related production requests and associated compliance obligations for the extended period, sustaining legal and operational burdens.
  • Congressional oversight committees and staff: By fixing a later repeal date, the bill compresses the calendar available for substantive deliberation and potential reauthorization or reform, increasing workload and political friction in the run‑up to April 30, 2026.
  • Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC): The court and its staff may face extended docketing and opinion‑writing needs tied to Title VII matters as authorities remain in force for the extended window.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central dilemma is operational continuity versus legislative and public scrutiny: the bill preserves intelligence collection authorities now to avoid disruption for national‑security operations, but by postponing substantive reconsideration it narrows the calendar and political leverage for resolving long‑standing privacy, oversight, and civil‑liberties concerns.

The bill is narrow: it edits the timing and cross‑references that determine when Title VII expires but leaves the operative text of Title VII intact. That narrowness produces both a predictable outcome (continued authority through the specified date) and a cluster of implementation questions.

Replacing historically layered amendment references with a single consolidated citation simplifies statutory reading, but it can obscure the provenance of discrete amendments and complicate judicial or agency efforts to determine which historical change controls a particular interpretive dispute.

The effective‑date language — earlier of enactment or April 19, 2026 — closes a potential gap but creates the possibility of rapid legal effect if Congress enacts the bill quickly. That fast‑start could leave little lead time for agencies, providers, and oversight entities to adjust administrative plans or to brief courts and stakeholders.

Finally, because the bill does not touch substantive safeguards (minimization, queries, targeting restrictions), all contentious policy issues that animated prior reauthorization debates remain unresolved; the extension simply defers those fights to the period before April 30, 2026.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.