The 9/11 Memorial and Museum Act authorizes a single federal grant to the organization that operates the National September 11 Memorial & Museum for use on operation, security, and maintenance. The Secretary of Homeland Security administers the award process, subject to availability of appropriations and eligibility requirements tied to the entity’s nonprofit status.
The bill couples federal support with tight transparency and public‑access conditions: the recipient must provide certain free admissions, accept annual federal audits of finances with public disclosure, and file annual reports to specified congressional committees. The measure is structured as a one‑time, discretionary award rather than a standing entitlement, leaving appropriation and implementation choices to DHS and Congress.
At a Glance
What It Does
Authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security to award a one‑time grant to the official nonprofit operator of the National September 11 Memorial & Museum for operation, security, and maintenance; the grant amount is within a statutory floor and ceiling and is subject to an application and Secretary review. The award is contingent on appropriations and Secretary findings that the applicant meets statutory criteria.
Who It Affects
The current nonprofit operator of the Memorial & Museum (the entity in existence on enactment) and its visitors; the Department of Homeland Security (which administers the grant and enforces audit/reporting conditions); and congressional oversight committees that will receive annual reports. Donors and ticket‑revenue streams may be indirectly affected by the bill’s transparency and free‑admission requirements.
Why It Matters
This is a targeted federal intervention in a major cultural and memorial institution that links security and preservation funding to public transparency and access requirements. For compliance officers and nonprofit finance teams, the bill creates discrete audit, reporting, and admission obligations attached to any federal support.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act defines the recipient as the official nonprofit organization that, on the date the law takes effect, operates the National September 11 Memorial & Museum and is tax‑exempt under section 501(c)(3). That narrow eligibility clause ties the grant to the existing operator rather than opening competition to other entities.
It directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to award a single grant, within a statutory minimum and maximum, for the museum’s operation, security, and maintenance—but only if Congress provides appropriations for the Office of the Secretary and Executive Management of DHS. The Secretary has discretion to determine the award amount within that range after reviewing an application the Secretary prescribes.The statute sets review and administrative mechanics: the Secretary must evaluate the application against specified criteria (including security needs, visitor counts, preservation and education commitments, and efforts to increase economically disadvantaged visitors) and, if satisfied, issue an award within 90 days of receiving a completed application.
The recipient must accept several conditions tied to public access and financial transparency.As conditions of receiving funds the bill requires free admission for active and retired service members, registered first responders to the 9/11 attacks, and family members of victims, plus at least one dedicated free‑admission hour each week for the general public. The recipient must also submit to annual federal audits of financial statements (covering ticket revenue, donations, grants, salaries, and operations) and make those audited statements available to the public.
Finally, the recipient must submit annual reports to designated House and Senate committees describing obligations and expenditures related to the grant. The statute explicitly states that no additional funds are authorized beyond appropriations provided in advance, making the program dependent on Congress’s budgeting choices.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The grant must be not less than $5,000,000 and not more than $10,000,000, with the Secretary setting the exact amount within that range.
After receiving a completed application, the Secretary must award the grant within 90 days if the applicant meets statutory criteria.
Only the organization operating the Memorial & Museum on the enactment date that is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit is eligible to apply.
As a condition of receipt, the recipient must provide free admission to active/retired Armed Forces members, individuals who were registered first responders to the 9/11 attacks, and family members of victims, and must offer dedicated free admission hours at least once per week for the general public.
The recipient must permit annual Federal audits of its financial statements (including ticket sales, donations, grants, salaries, and operations), make those audits available to the public, and submit annual reports to named House and Senate committees.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Provides the act’s short name: the '9/11 Memorial and Museum Act.' This is a formal, non‑substantive provision but signals the law’s focused purpose on the Memorial & Museum rather than a broader cultural grants program.
Definitions and targeted eligibility
Defines key terms used throughout the bill: the National September 11 Memorial & Museum, the eligible entity (explicitly the operator in existence on enactment that is a 501(c)(3)), and 'Secretary' as the Homeland Security Secretary. By tying eligibility to the existing operator and 501(c)(3) status, Congress limits the grant to the museum’s current nonprofit steward and excludes, for example, municipal entities or newly formed organizations.
Grant authority, purpose, and amount range
Authorizes the Secretary to award a one‑time grant for operation, security, and maintenance, but conditions the award on appropriations made in advance to DHS. The statute sets a floor ($5M) and ceiling ($10M) for a single award, giving the Secretary discretion within that band. Structuring the program as a one‑time award with a hard cap limits long‑term federal commitment and frames this as supplemental relief rather than ongoing support.
Application, review standard, and award timeline
Requires the eligible entity to submit an application in the form and timeframe the Secretary prescribes. The Secretary must evaluate the application against enumerated criteria—security needs, visitor impact, preservation and education plans, and efforts to increase economically disadvantaged visitors—and award the grant within 90 days of receiving a completed application if criteria are met. The statutory criteria are descriptive rather than metricized, leaving the Secretary significant discretion to set evidentiary expectations in regulations or guidance.
Conditions of receipt, audits, and reporting
Imposes concrete conditions: mandatory categories of free admission (military, registered first responders, victims’ family members) and at least one weekly free public admission hour; annual Federal audits of financial statements covering ticket revenue, donations, grants, salaries, and operations; public availability of audit results; and annual reporting to specified House and Senate committees. These conditions attach transparency and public‑access obligations to federal support and create compliance and disclosure tasks for the recipient.
Funding constraint
Clarifies that the Act authorizes no additional funds beyond appropriations made in advance. This makes the program contingent on congressional budgeting and prevents automatic or open‑ended expenditures; it also signals the grant is discretionary and limited rather than a mandatory or permanent funding stream.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- The Memorial & Museum operator — receives a single federal infusion to support security, maintenance, and operations without opening the operator to competition, easing short‑term budget pressures for capital or operational needs.
- Active and retired Armed Forces members, registered 9/11 first responders, and family members of victims — gain guaranteed free admission under the statute, reducing access barriers tied to ticket costs.
- Economically disadvantaged visitors — the statute promotes increased access by encouraging the recipient to use funds to expand access for lower‑income visitors and to provide at least weekly free public admission hours.
- Congressional oversight committees — receive structured annual reporting and publicly available audited financial statements, improving visibility into how federal funds are used and facilitating legislative oversight.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal appropriations — taxpayers ultimately fund the one‑time grant, and appropriators must prioritize this award within DHS’s budget envelope; because the act authorizes no new mandatory spending, funding displaces other budget requests or requires new appropriations.
- The Memorial & Museum operator — must absorb compliance costs (preparing Federal audit‑ready financials, expanded reporting, and managing free‑admission programs) and potential revenue impacts from the mandated free admissions and weekly free hours.
- Donors and private funders — face potential public disclosure of some financial activity through the requirement for public audits, which may affect donor confidentiality preferences and fundraising strategies.
- The Department of Homeland Security — assumes administrative burden to process applications, enforce criteria, and oversee audits and reporting without dedicated new appropriations for program administration.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between using targeted federal support plus strong transparency and access conditions to preserve a nationally significant memorial, and the risk that those same conditions—public financial disclosure, mandated free access, and a one‑time capped award—undermine the institution’s fundraising flexibility and long‑term financial stability while imposing administrative burdens on DHS and the operator.
The bill ties a culturally significant institution to a homeland security grant process in a way that mixes mission objectives. DHS is charged with assessing needs like preservation and education—functions normally associated with cultural grantmakers—yet the statute does not allocate dedicated administrative funds to DHS for this new role.
That gap raises questions about who bears the administrative cost of review, monitoring, and enforcement. The statute’s criteria are qualitative (security, visitor counts, preservation commitment, outreach to economically disadvantaged visitors) but do not set objective thresholds or require specific performance metrics, leaving much to the Secretary’s implementing guidance.
The transparency requirements are stringent: audited financial statements covering donations, ticket revenue, grants, salaries, and operations must be made public. That requirement advances public accountability but may chill private fundraising or complicate donor confidentiality, particularly for large gifts.
The mandated free admission categories and weekly public hours advance access goals but could reduce earned revenue or shift visitation patterns; the law does not provide a mechanism to compensate the operator for lost ticket revenue beyond the one‑time award. Finally, because the grant is explicitly contingent on appropriations and is one‑time only, the bill may relieve near‑term needs while leaving long‑term maintenance liabilities unaddressed.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.