The Clean Slate through Repayment Act of 2026 adds a new section to the Higher Education Act requiring the Secretary of Education, guaranty agencies, or other holders of Title IV loans to request consumer reporting agencies remove a record of default (and related adverse information) from a borrower's credit history when the borrower repays the loan in full. The change targets loans made, insured, or guaranteed under Title IV and addresses only defaults that have been satisfied by full repayment.
This is a narrow, document-level fix: it does not amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act, set deadlines, create penalties for noncompliance, or define procedural steps for verification. For lenders, servicers, and guaranty agencies the bill creates an operational obligation to trigger credit-file removals; for borrowers it promises a path to erase a default's presence on credit reports once they have fully satisfied the debt.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill adds Section 494A to the Higher Education Act, obligating the Secretary, guaranty agency, or loan holder to request that consumer reporting agencies remove a reported default and related adverse data from a borrower’s credit history after the borrower repays the full amount due on a Title IV defaulted loan. The statutory duty is to make the request; the bill does not directly compel consumer reporting agencies to act or prescribe a removal timeline.
Who It Affects
Directly affected parties are federal student loan holders— the Department of Education when it holds loans, guaranty agencies, and private holders of Title IV loans — along with servicers who process repayment and reporting. Indirectly affected are borrowers with previously defaulted Title IV loans, credit reporters and downstream creditors (mortgage, auto, rental) that use credit files in risk decisions.
Why It Matters
By clearing default notations after full repayment, the bill could materially improve borrowers’ credit profiles and access to credit and housing. At the same time it forces operational changes in reporting and record-keeping without creating FCRA-level enforcement or a standardized procedure, raising implementation and compliance questions for servicers and agencies.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill inserts a single new statutory provision into Part G of Title IV. Under the new Section 494A, the trigger is straightforward: if a borrower repays in full the amount due on a loan that went into default under Title IV, the entity that holds or guaranteed the loan must request that any consumer reporting agency that received notice of the default remove the default entry and associated adverse information from the borrower’s credit report.
The text covers loans made, insured, or guaranteed under Title IV and ties the obligation to the act of full repayment.
Practically, the statute creates an obligation on three potential actors—the Secretary, a guaranty agency, or “other” loan holders—to take a communications step to consumer reporting agencies. The bill does not rewrite how credit repositories operate under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, nor does it spell out what documentation the borrower must provide, what counts as ‘‘full repayment’’ (for example, whether collection costs or administrative fees must be paid), or how quickly the request must be made after payment.Because the statute mandates only that the holder request removal, it leaves execution details to agencies and servicers.
Loan holders will need internal processes: detect when a defaulted Title IV loan reaches full repayment, assemble proof of payment or status, and transmit a removal request to the consumer reporting agencies that had been furnished the default. Credit bureaus will receive a request but the bill is silent about whether they must comply, under what standard, or whether borrowers gain a new private right of action if the request is ignored.The provision is narrow in scope and technical in effect: it targets the single data point of a recorded default (and related adverse information) rather than broader loan records or ongoing reporting obligations.
It does not change the underlying loan obligations, affect federal collections authorities, or create new remedies for borrowers beyond the removal request mechanism written into Title IV.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds a new Section 494A to Part G of Title IV of the Higher Education Act requiring holders of defaulted Title IV loans to request credit reporting agencies remove a default after the borrower repays the loan in full.
It applies only to loans made, insured, or guaranteed under Title IV — private education loans and other consumer debts are outside its scope.
The statute compels loan holders (the Secretary, guaranty agencies, or other holders) to request removal but does not directly obligate consumer reporting agencies to erase the data or set a deadline for action.
The text does not define ‘‘repays in full’’ or list what counts as ‘‘related adverse information,’’ leaving key definitions and verification steps to implementation.
The bill contains no enforcement mechanism, civil penalty, or private right of action tied to failure to request or effect removal.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Designates the act as the 'Clean Slate through Repayment Act of 2026.' This is a standard naming provision and carries no substantive effect beyond providing the bill's public title.
Removal of record of default after full repayment
Adds statutory text requiring that when a borrower repays in full a defaulted loan under Title IV, the Secretary of Education, a guaranty agency, or another holder of the loan must request that any consumer reporting agency that received notice of the default remove the default and related adverse information from the borrower's credit history. The provision identifies the actors who must make the request and the outcome requested (removal of default and related adverse entries), but it does not define timing, documentation, or enforcement.
Limited coverage to Title IV loans and to 'request' power
The statute explicitly confines its reach to loans 'made, insured, or guaranteed under this title,' i.e., Title IV HEA programs. It also frames the obligation as a duty to 'request' removal from consumer reporting agencies rather than a command that agencies must delete the data, a drafting choice that preserves separate obligations and legal regimes governing credit reporting (for example, under the FCRA).
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Education across all five countries.
Explore Education in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Borrowers who fully repay defaulted Title IV loans — they stand to have default notations and associated adverse items removed from credit reports, potentially improving credit scores and access to mortgages, auto loans, rental housing, and employment backgrounds that use credit checks.
- Cosigners and household members affected by a reported default — removal of the default record can indirectly reduce obstacles that cosigners face when seeking new credit or mortgages tied to the borrower's credit profile.
- Credit-sensitive markets (mortgage lenders, landlords, insurers) — clearer credit files that reflect resolved debt may improve underwriting accuracy and reduce time spent investigating repaid federal defaults.
Who Bears the Cost
- Guaranty agencies, the Department of Education, and private loan holders — they must build or adapt processes to detect full repayment, collect proof, and send removal requests to consumer reporting agencies, incurring administrative and IT costs.
- Loan servicers — operational workflows will need revision to flag full repayment of defaulted accounts, coordinate with guaranty agencies or holders, and document removal requests; servicers may also face increased verification burdens to prevent erroneous removals.
- Consumer reporting agencies and downstream data users — while the bill only requires a request, bureaus will need to evaluate and process removal requests, update records, and reconcile with furnishers; creditors may see changes in historic data that affect models and underwriting.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances borrower rehabilitation against the integrity of credit files: it recognizes that satisfied federal defaults should not indefinitely stigmatize borrowers, but by mandating removal requests without clear verification standards or CRA obligations it risks uneven application and potential loss of historically relevant information that lenders use to price risk.
The statute raises multiple implementation gaps. First, it does not define 'repays in full' — the term could be read narrowly (principal and accrued interest) or more broadly to include collection costs, fees, and administrative charges; holders and servicers will need to adopt a uniform standard to avoid inconsistent relief.
Second, the bill requires only that holders request removal; it does not obligate consumer reporting agencies to comply, nor does it create a deadline, audit requirement, or penalty for failure to act. That drafting choice leaves the ultimate effect dependent on CRAs' voluntary compliance or parallel FCRA processes for disputing inaccurate information.
Third, the bill does not address how this new Title IV duty interacts with existing furnisher obligations under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, including accuracy requirements and procedures under 15 U.S.C. § 1681s-2. It also says nothing about consolidated loans, rehabilitated loans, loans resolved by settlement or compromise, or administrative offsets; those edge cases will require policy guidance.
Finally, the lack of a consumer-facing mechanism (notice, proof standards, or right to compel removal) could lead to uneven outcomes across guaranty agencies and servicers, shifting the burden to borrowers to press for removal or to resort to FCRA dispute channels.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.