The No Foreign Persons Administering Our Elections Act would prohibit a state or local jurisdiction from hiring anyone who is not a United States citizen to administer an election for federal office. The prohibition applies to elections for federal office and takes effect for elections held on or after enactment.
The bill is narrowly scoped and silent on exemptions or enforcement mechanisms in its current form, leaving jurisdictions to interpret how the citizenship requirement will apply to their existing staffing and contractors.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill bars non-citizens from serving as election administrators for federal elections, and makes the prohibition applicable to any election for federal office held after enactment.
Who It Affects
State and local election offices, HR departments, and any entities involved in administering federal elections.
Why It Matters
It sets a uniform citizenship standard for election administration at the federal level, potentially changing staffing practices and compliance workflows across jurisdictions.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
HB882 creates a citizenship requirement for anyone who administers federal elections. It says that, at the state or local level, you cannot hire someone who is not a U.S. citizen to administer a federal election.
The rule applies to elections for federal office and applies to elections held after the bill becomes law. The text does not specify any exemptions or carve-outs, nor does it outline enforcement mechanisms, funding, or transitional provisions.
Jurisdictions will need to assess their current staffing and contractor arrangements to come into compliance when the first eligible federal election occurs after enactment. The bill’s focus is narrow and does not address broader issues of election integrity beyond who can administer federal elections.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill prohibits hiring non-citizens to administer elections for federal office in state or local jurisdictions.
The prohibition applies to elections for Federal office held on or after enactment.
There are no explicit exemptions or carve-outs in the text.
The act is titled the No Foreign Persons Administering Our Elections Act.
Introduced January 31, 2025, in the 119th Congress.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
This section provides the act’s short title, the “No Foreign Persons Administering Our Elections Act,” which frames the scope and public framing of the measure.
Hiring requirements for election administrators
Section 2 prohibits a state or local jurisdiction from hiring a non-citizen to administer an election for federal office. It also states that the prohibition applies to elections for federal office held on or after enactment. The text does not specify exemptions, definitions of “administer,” or enforcement mechanisms within this section, leaving questions about scope and compliance to be clarified through guidance or subsequent amendments.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Elections across all five countries.
Explore Elections in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- U.S. citizens seeking election administration roles for federal elections, who would have eligibility under the bill’s standard.
- State and local election offices that adhere to a citizen-based standard for federal elections may gain a clear staffing criterion and potentially reduce concerns about citizenship status in staffing decisions.
- Federal election oversight bodies that require distinct, observable criteria for staffing could benefit from a uniform standard for administering federal elections.
Who Bears the Cost
- Non-citizen individuals currently employed as election administrators who would be displaced or unable to continue in their roles for federal elections.
- State and local election offices that must replace non-citizen staff with U.S. citizens, with potential recruitment, onboarding, and transition costs.
- Potential temporary staffing shortages or increased training costs as offices transition to a citizen-only staffing model for federal elections.
- Vendors and contractors who supply staffing or services to election offices may see changes in demand or contract terms as jurisdictions adjust to the new standard.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing a citizens-based qualification for election administration with the practical realities of staffing federal elections across diverse jurisdictions, which may already rely on non-citizen workers or contractors. This creates a tension between a clear eligibility criterion and potential operational disruption, especially during transitions or emergencies.
The bill’s text is narrow, and several practical questions aren’t addressed. Notably, there is no defined mechanism for enforcement, no transitional guidance, and no explicit exemptions for existing staff, contractors, or certain categories of election workers.
How “administer” is interpreted in practice could determine the bill’s real-world reach—e.g., whether poll workers or ballot-counting personnel fall under the prohibition. The lack of funding language could also shape how jurisdictions meet any new staffing requirement, and there may be a need for administrative or regulatory guidance to clarify timing, scope, and exceptions if any are intended.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.