Codify — Article

Safe Home Act creates 25% wildfire mitigation credit up to $25k

A refundable tax credit to spur ignition-resistant upgrades and defensible space for homes in wildfire-prone areas, with a 2032 sunset and AGI-based phaseout.

The Brief

The SAFE HOME Act would add a new refundable personal credit (Sec. 36C) to the Internal Revenue Code to subsidize wildfire mitigation expenditures on qualifying dwellings. The credit equals 25% of eligible costs, with a cap of $25,000 per year.

It includes an AGI-based phaseout and cost-of-living adjustments, and it sunsets after 2032. The bill defines qualifying expenditures (roofing, wall assemblies, ignition-resistant components, buffers, vegetation management, fire maintenance) and requires documentation to the IRS.

It also introduces a conforming amendment to insert Sec. 36C into the tax code and specifies an effective date for tax years beginning after 2024.

At a Glance

What It Does

Establishes a refundable tax credit (Sec. 36C) equal to 25% of qualified wildfire mitigation expenditures, with a $25,000 annual cap and an AGI-based phaseout, plus an explicit sunset in 2032.

Who It Affects

Homeowners with qualified dwellings in wildfire-prone areas, ignition-resistant retrofit contractors, and tax professionals assisting with the new credit.

Why It Matters

Encourages private investment in home hardening and defensible space, aiming to reduce wildfire risk and potential federal disaster costs by shifting resilience costs toward private compliance.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill creates a new refundable tax credit for wildfire mitigation expenditures on qualifying homes. It targets primary residences located in wildfire-prone areas and supports a defined set of improvements—ranging from ignition-resistant roofing and walls to vegetation management and water-based defenses.

The credit is 25% of eligible costs, up to a $25,000 per-year cap, and it phases out as adjusted gross income rises, with adjustments for inflation. Expenditures funded by government entities do not qualify.

A key design element is the requirement for documentation to verify eligible spending. The credit is scheduled to end after 2032, ensuring a finite window for uptake.

A conforming amendment inserts Sec. 36C into the Internal Revenue Code, and the provisions apply to tax years beginning after 2024.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The bill creates a refundable credit equal to 25% of qualified wildfire mitigation expenditures.

2

The annual credit cap is $25,000; the amount is reduced for higher AGI according to a defined formula.

3

Only qualified dwelling units in the United States using ignition-resistant construction qualify.

4

Expenditures funded or reimbursed by government entities do not qualify.

5

The credit terminates after 2032 and becomes law for tax years beginning after 2024.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 36C

Refundable wildfire mitigation credit

Imposes a new refundable credit as part of the tax code that allows an annual credit equal to 25% of qualified wildfire mitigation expenditures for a qualifying dwelling unit, establishing the core mechanism and eligible costs. This section sets the framework for how the credit operates, including the types of mitigations covered and the accountability measures for claiming the credit.

Section 36C(a)

Credit amount and eligibility

Specifies the basic calculation: 25% of eligible expenditures, subject to a $25,000 cap per taxable year. It delineates eligibility parameters and the requirement that the dwelling unit be a primary residence qualifying under the defined conditions.

Section 36C(b)

Credit cap, phaseout, inflation adjustment

Outlines the cap and the phaseout mechanism based on the taxpayer’s AGI relative to a threshold, with adjustments for inflation using the cost-of-living adjustment. Details how reductions are rounded to the nearest $50 and the conditions under which the credit can be reduced to zero.

5 more sections
Section 36C(c)

Definitions

Provides definitions for ‘qualified wildfire mitigation expenditure’ and ‘qualified dwelling unit,’ listing the eligible improvements, installation standards (ignition-resistant construction), and the homeowner criteria, including primary residence status and location criteria such as disaster-designated areas or Hazard Mitigation Assistance eligibility.

Section 36C(d)

Documentation

Requires taxpayers to provide adequate documentation to the Secretary showing the specific expenditures and supporting information necessary to verify eligibility, enabling IRS administration and compliance.

Section 36C(e)

Termination

Establishes a sunset for the credit after December 31, 2032, ensuring a finite period for the incentive and creating a built-in deadline for uptake and program evaluation.

Conforming amendment

Conforming amendment to the tax code

Inserts the new Sec. 36C in the table of sections, ensuring the credit is properly integrated into Subpart C of Part IV of Subchapter A and is recognized in tax calculations.

Effective date

Effective date

Applies to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024, setting the date from which the credit can be claimed and aligning with the bill’s introduction timeline.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.

Explore Finance in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Homeowners with qualified, primary residences in wildfire-prone areas who undertake eligible mitigations and see a refundable credit offset a portion of their costs.
  • Contractors and installers specializing in ignition-resistant materials and wildfire-mitigation retrofits who supply or install qualifying improvements.
  • Property managers and lenders in regions with reported wildfire risk may see reduced property risk and more resilient housing stock.
  • Public safety advocates and state/local agencies promoting hazard mitigation could see higher adoption of resilience measures through private investment.

Who Bears the Cost

  • The U.S. Treasury/General Fund, due to the revenue cost of a refundable credit extending to potentially large refunds.
  • IRS/Department of the Treasury administrative costs associated with issuing, verifying, and auditing documentation for the new credit.
  • Taxpayers whose expenditures qualify and who claim the credit, as the credit reduces receipts and benefits the claimants at the expense of federal revenue (and potentially other tax options).
  • Contractors and vendors may incur costs to demonstrate compliance and to provide required supporting documentation to clients and the IRS.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central dilemma is balancing a strong public safety incentive to spur private wildfire mitigation with the fiscal and administrative costs of a large, refundable credit that targets a narrow use case (home mitigation) and sunsets in 2032. The design must negotiate access (who qualifies and where), realism of implementation (upfront costs and documentation), and political constraints on federal spending.

The bill creates a robust incentive for private wildfire mitigation, but it also introduces several policy tensions. The refundable nature of the credit makes it more expensive for the federal fisc than a nonrefundable deduction, and the phaseout tied to AGI adds complexity and potential inequities across income groups.

The definitions layer—particularly the requirement that a dwelling unit be eligible based on disaster declarations or resilience zone designations—may limit uptake to areas with specific federal recognition, potentially leaving wildfire-impacted homeowners outside the program. The 2032 sunset introduces a hard horizon for policymakers to reassess whether private resilience investments have met public safety goals.

The documentation requirement, while essential for compliance, increases administrative burden on taxpayers and the IRS, raising the stakes for accurate recordkeeping and verification. Finally, the interaction with other federal and local resilience funding programs could produce unintended overlaps or gaps in funding for mitigation projects, depending on a family's overall funding mix.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.