The HOPE Act of 2025 adds a new Section 530A to the Internal Revenue Code to create HOPE Accounts: tax‑exempt trusts designed to pay qualified medical expenses. The statute borrows many mechanics from HSAs and IRAs (trust form, trustee standards, rollover rules) but sets its own contribution caps, eligibility restrictions, third‑party contribution limits, and tax treatment for distributions.
For professionals: the bill creates a new employer‑reportable benefit class, imposes trustee reporting (Form 5498‑A), aligns certain employer contributions with Section 106 employer‑provided coverage rules (with income limits), and applies a stiff 30% additional tax on nonqualified distributions. The Act also amends multiple sections of the Code (106, 4973, 4980G, 4975, 6693) so payroll, benefits, tax, and compliance teams will have to map HOPE Accounts into existing HSA/retirement compliance frameworks.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill authorizes HOPE Accounts — tax‑exempt trusts to pay qualified medical expenses and exempts earnings and qualified distributions from gross income. It prescribes trustee standards, contribution limits tied to monthly rules, coordination with HSAs/FSAs/HRAs, a 50% cap on third‑party contributions, and reporting obligations for trustees and employers.
Who It Affects
Insurers, employer benefits teams, payroll vendors, third‑party administrators and trust custodians will administer and report HOPE Accounts; high‑out‑of‑pocket individuals and members of federally recognized tribes are explicitly eligible. The IRS and Treasury must issue guidance and collect new information returns (Form 5498‑A).
Why It Matters
HOPE Accounts create a new tax‑favored vehicle for covering medical OOP costs that sits alongside HSAs and FSAs but with different rules, caps, and penalties — changing employer benefit design options and compliance obligations while introducing a new avenue for state or employer cost‑sharing contributions.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates a new type of tax‑preferred account, called a HOPE Account, established as a U.S. trust whose sole purpose is paying an account beneficiary’s qualified medical expenses. Trustees must be banks, insurance companies, or approved fiduciaries, and the trust instrument must include substantiation and reporting procedures.
HOPE Accounts are tax‑exempt under Subtitle A, but subject to unrelated business income tax if applicable, and trustees must file annual reports to the IRS and account owners using Form 5498‑A (or successor forms).
Eligibility ties to coverage: an individual must have minimum essential coverage (or Indian Health Service access for federally recognized Tribe members and descendants) and cannot receive concurrent contributions to a health FSA, HSA, Archer MSA, or employer‑provided HRA (with limited exceptions). Contributions are limited monthly: the statute sets per‑month ceilings equating to $4,000 and $8,000 annualized buckets (with cost‑of‑living indexing after 2026) and reduces available contribution room by amounts contributed to HSAs and certain other accounts.
Contributions from employers and state programs are allowed but capped at 50% of the individual limit. Employer contributions are treated under Section 106 as employer‑provided coverage (subject to AGI limits) and must be reported on wage statements.Distributions used for qualified medical expenses are tax‑free.
The bill tightly restricts nonqualified distributions: generally those distributions are prohibited unless they are made after death or for a disabled beneficiary and are reported; taxable non‑qualified distributions are included in gross income and subject to an extra 30% tax. The statute sets ordering rules that allocate distributions first to earnings, then to third‑party contributions, then to individual contributions, and finally to rollovers.
The bill also prohibits counting HOPE Account distributions as medical expenses for the section 213 itemized deduction. Finally, the Act inserts HOPE Accounts into multiple Code provisions (excess contribution rules, prohibited transaction regime, employer comparability penalty) and takes effect for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill caps aggregate annual contributions via monthly limits that start at $4,000 (self‑only / certain married filers) and $8,000 (head‑of‑household with family coverage), with cost‑of‑living increases after 2026.
Third‑party contributions (employers and approved State programs) cannot exceed 50% of an individual’s HOPE Account limit for the year.
Nonqualified distributions are generally prohibited; when allowed (death or disability) they are taxable and the account beneficiary faces an additional tax equal to 30% of the includible amount.
Employers’ contributions to employee HOPE Accounts are treated as employer‑provided coverage under Section 106 but are denied for taxpayers with adjusted gross income over $100,000 ($200,000 joint); such contributions must be reported on Form W‑2.
Trustees must report contributions on Form 5498‑A, request information about any FSA contributions, and follow substantiation procedures comparable to proposed Treasury Reg. §1.125–6; there are new excise and excess‑contribution penalty pathways under sections 4973 and 6693.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Establishes tax‑exempt HOPE Accounts and trust form requirements
This subsection inserts new Section 530A and makes HOPE Accounts tax‑exempt trusts under Subtitle A while preserving unrelated business income tax exposure. It prescribes the trust structure: permissible trustees (banks, insurers, or approved persons), prohibition on life insurance investments, non‑forfeitability of account balances, limits on administrative fees, and mandatory substantiation/reporting procedures. Practically, it forces custodians and TPA vendors to create account documents and compliance processes that mirror IRA/HSA infrastructure but with HOPE‑specific reporting hooks.
Definitions and eligibility — coverage and coordination rules
This subsection defines eligible individuals, qualified medical expenses (cross‑referencing §223(d)(2)), account beneficiary, and ties eligibility to having minimum essential coverage or Indian Health Service access for Tribal members. Importantly, it blocks contributions if the individual receives contributions to a health FSA, HSA, Archer MSA, or employer‑provided HRA (with a narrow exception referencing HSA rules). That coordination both prevents double‑dipping and creates operational complexity for payroll/benefits teams reconciling employee participation across benefit platforms.
Contribution limits, third‑party caps, and coordination with other tax‑preferred accounts
This part sets the monthly and aggregate contribution ceilings, specifies cost‑of‑living adjustments after 2026, and mandates coordination: an individual’s HOPE limit is reduced by amounts counted under §223(b)(4) (HSA catch‑ups/limits) and other HSA contributions, and by employer HOPE contributions. It also limits aggregate employer/State contributions to 50% of the applicable limit and permits an exclusion from gross income for certain third‑party contributions only for taxpayers under specific AGI thresholds. Compliance teams will need to track contributions across multiple account types and across employer/state sources to avoid excesses and potential excise tax.
Tax treatment of distributions, ordering, rollovers and penalties
Distributions for qualified medical expenses are income‑free. Nonqualified distributions are generally barred; limited exceptions (death or disability) are allowed but taxable. The bill imposes a 30% additional tax on includible nonqualified distributions (distinct from the 20% HSA penalty), and sets an ordering rule that treats distributions as coming first from earnings, then from third‑party contributions, then individual contributions, then rollovers on a FIFO basis. It also provides the 60‑day rollover window and excess‑contribution return rules. Those ordering and penalty choices materially affect how taxable income is calculated on distributions and how custodians should code and report distribution types.
Cross‑cutting amendments: employer treatment, excess contributions, prohibited transactions, reporting penalties
The bill amends Section 106 to treat employer contributions as employer‑provided coverage (with AGI limits and special rules), expands the definition of excess contributions under Section 4973 to include HOPE Accounts, folds HOPE Accounts into the failure‑to‑make‑comparable‑contributions penalty regime under Section 4980G, applies prohibited transaction rules under Section 4975, and adds reporting failures for trustees to the excise rules under Section 6693. Together these amendments force benefit designers, payroll, and counsel to reconcile HOPE Accounts with existing HSA and cafeteria plan compliance regimes and expose employers and custodians to familiar—but newly applied—penalties.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- High out‑of‑pocket patients and families: HOPE Accounts let individuals with significant deductible/copay exposure build tax‑favored reserves specifically for OOP medical expenses, reducing intermittent liquidity strain. The accounts pay qualified medical expenses tax‑free, improving cash flow for medically intensive households.
- Employers seeking targeted benefits: Employers can fund up to half of an employee’s HOPE limit and treat the contribution as employer‑provided coverage under Section 106 (subject to AGI limits), providing a new tool for benefit differentiation without redesigning core group health plans.
- Members of federally recognized Tribes and descendants: The bill expressly recognizes Indian Health Service coverage for eligibility, giving Tribal members access even if they rely on IHS rather than commercial MEC sources.
Who Bears the Cost
- Employers and plan sponsors: Employers that choose to contribute face new reporting obligations (W‑2 reporting and Form 5498‑A interactions), potential 4980G comparability penalties if they fail to make comparable contributions, and administrative costs to integrate HOPE Accounts into payroll and benefits platforms.
- Trustees, custodians and TPAs: Banks, insurers and third‑party administrators must draft new trust documents, implement substantiation and 5498‑A reporting, track cross‑account contributions (HSA/FSA/HRA), and monitor distribution ordering and nonqualified distribution reporting — increasing operational complexity and compliance costs.
- High‑income individuals with nonqualified withdrawals: The bill levies a steep 30% additional tax on taxable nonqualified distributions, meaning individuals who take nonqualified funds (or whose distributions are later recharacterized) can face significant tax penalties and unexpected liability.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between increasing access to tax‑favored savings for large out‑of‑pocket medical costs and preventing layered subsidies and abuse: generous, flexible HOPE Accounts help people manage medical spending but create new opportunities for double‑counting or fiscal leakage unless tightly limited; the bill tries to curb that with coordination rules, third‑party caps, income exclusions, and a harsh nonqualified distribution tax — tradeoffs that leave access, simplicity, and fiscal control pulling in different directions.
Implementation will hinge on Treasury and IRS guidance. The statute references proposed Treasury Reg. §1.125–6 for substantiation and allows the Secretary to issue ‘other guidance’ — but many operational details are unspecified: how custodians verify concurrent FSA/HSA/HRA participation in real time, how to coordinate cost‑sharing reductions converted by States, and how third‑party employer contributions are tracked across multiple employers in a calendar year.
Those gaps will drive vendor and employer uncertainty until regulations and electronic interfaces are standardized.
The bill mixes several familiar tax regimes (HSA mechanics, IRA trust rules, employer‑provided coverage treatment) but departs in consequential ways — notably the 30% additional tax, the ordering rule that treats earnings as distributed first, and the 50% cap on third‑party funding. These choices change incentives for contribution timing, source of funding, and rollover behavior and may produce unforeseen tax outcomes.
The statutory language around coverage categories and contribution categories (for example, the unusual carve‑outs tied to filing status and ‘head of household’) is potentially ambiguous and could require technical corrections or interpretive guidance.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.