HB 988 amends the federal charter for the National Woman’s Relief Corps in title 36 of the U.S. Code to change the organization’s statutory place of incorporation and domicile from the District of Columbia to Illinois and to move its named principal office from Springfield to Murphysboro, Illinois. The bill also updates the statutory procedure for service of process so that service runs through an Illinois-designated agent and the Illinois Secretary of State (or another office designated under Illinois law) instead of D.C. offices.
The change is narrow on its face—three targeted edits to the charter text—but it matters for lawyers and compliance officers because it alters the organization’s formal legal locus. That shift affects which state officials receive service, which state law may govern certain corporate formalities, and which state agencies will handle related administrative tasks.
The statute does not add transitional rules, tax provisions, or governance changes, so implementation will raise practical questions for the Corps, state authorities, and counterparties with existing DC-based references.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill amends specific subsections of title 36 by replacing geographic references: it substitutes 'Illinois' for 'District of Columbia' in the domicile provision, replaces 'Springfield' with 'Murphysboro' for the principal office, and redirects service-of-process language from D.C. officials to an Illinois-designated agent and the Illinois Secretary of State (or the office Illinois law specifies).
Who It Affects
Directly affected parties include the National Woman’s Relief Corps (the federally chartered nonprofit), Illinois state officials (notably the Secretary of State), Murphysboro municipal officials, and any entities or contracts that name the Corps' former D.C. address. D.C. agencies and legal professionals who previously handled the Corps’ filings will see those responsibilities move.
Why It Matters
Moving a federally chartered nonprofit’s statutory domicile changes practical legal touchpoints—service routes, venue considerations, and administrative oversight—without altering the charter’s substantive powers. That creates a short window of administrative and legal adjustments for the organization, state regulators, and counterparties that reference the charter.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
HB 988 makes three focused textual edits to the National Woman’s Relief Corps’ federal charter in title 36. First, it replaces the charter’s reference to the 'District of Columbia' as the place of incorporation and domicile with 'Illinois.' Second, it changes the named principal office location from 'Springfield' to 'Murphysboro.' Third, it adjusts service-of-process language to require a designated agent in Illinois and to substitute the Illinois Secretary of State (or an office that Illinois law designates) for the prior references to D.C. officials.
The bill does not alter the Corps’ federal-charter status, its purposes, or internal governance rules beyond those three geographic and procedural references. It also does not include transitional language—there is no separate section describing how to transfer records, memorialize consent, or amend contracts that name the old D.C. address.
That means the statutory change will take effect as a change in the charter text itself; the practical mechanics for effecting the move will fall to the organization and the relevant state and local agencies.Practically, counselors and compliance officers should expect a handful of follow-up tasks after enactment: update the Corps’ official records and corporate documents to reflect the new statutory domicile and office, notify counterparties and registries that rely on the old D.C. address, and coordinate with the Illinois Secretary of State on service-of-process procedures. Because the bill redirects service to Illinois offices, pending or future litigation that relies on the charter’s service rules could see changes in where and how service is perfected.
The statute is silent about state-level registration or charitable-registration obligations; those remain governed by Illinois and D.C. law and will likely require separate filings or notifications.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill amends 36 U.S.C. §153701(b) by replacing the words 'the District of Columbia' with 'Illinois.', It amends 36 U.S.C. §153708 by substituting every instance of 'Springfield' with 'Murphysboro.', It amends 36 U.S.C. §153710 to require a 'designated agent in Illinois' and to replace references to the 'Mayor of the District of Columbia' with the 'Secretary of State of Illinois or another office as designated by Illinois law.', The text contains no transitional or implementation provisions—there is no guidance on transferring records, notifying donors, or reconciling contractual references to the prior D.C. address.
The bill changes statutory touchpoints (domicile and service-of-process) but does not modify the Corps’ federal-charter powers, governance provisions, or federal tax status.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Domicile: swaps 'District of Columbia' for 'Illinois'
This amendment replaces the charter’s stated place of incorporation and domicile. On enactment, the statutory text will identify Illinois as the Corps’ place of incorporation/domicile instead of the District of Columbia. The practical implications are jurisdictional: some legal questions about internal corporate affairs and the formal locus for the charter’s statutory references will now point to Illinois rather than D.C., although the bill does not specify how Illinois law will treat the federally chartered entity.
Principal office: changes named city to Murphysboro
This edit swaps the named city in the charter’s principal-office clause. Naming Murphysboro establishes a specific municipal location for the Corps’ principal office in the statutory text, which matters for public record, local recognition, and any contracts or regulatory references that rely on the chartered address. The bill does not create obligations for the municipality; it simply establishes the statutory designation.
Service of process: redirects service to Illinois officials
The bill changes the service-of-process mechanism by specifying a 'designated agent in Illinois' and directing service to the Illinois Secretary of State (or another Illinois office as state law provides) instead of to D.C. officials. This alters who receives formal notices and where service is perfected under the federal charter. For litigants and counsel, the default procedural route for serving the Corps under the charter will move to Illinois offices; the amendment does not, however, address how to handle pending proceedings or existing service arrangements.
No transitional language or state-level registration instructions
The statute contains no clauses on transition logistics: it does not require the Corps to file documents in Illinois, instruct Illinois to accept the move, nor provide for notice to donors, creditors, or registries in D.C. That omission leaves implementation to the organization and to state administrative processes and may require separate filings under Illinois law (for example, charitable registration or corporate filing requirements) that the bill does not address.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Veterans across all five countries.
Explore Veterans in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- National Woman’s Relief Corps — gains a statutory domicile that aligns with the organization’s current or chosen operational base, simplifying local visibility and clarifying where the charter names a principal office.
- Murphysboro, Illinois — receives the civic recognition and potential modest economic or reputational benefits of being the Corps’ named principal office in the federal charter.
- Illinois Secretary of State and local legal practitioners — will oversee service-of-process under the charter and are likely to see related filings or requests for guidance, generating work for state administrators and attorneys.
- Veterans and auxiliary stakeholders in Illinois — may find easier local access to the organization’s offices and events if the statutory change reflects on-the-ground operations.
Who Bears the Cost
- National Woman’s Relief Corps — will bear administrative and compliance costs to update charters, corporate records, donor materials, and to coordinate with Illinois agencies; counsel fees and re-notification burdens fall on the organization.
- District of Columbia agencies and local stakeholders — lose a corporately chartered entity from their records and the convenience of being the statutory recipient of service, and may need to update public records.
- Illinois state agencies and municipal offices — assume administrative responsibility for service-of-process and potentially for processing filings or responding to inquiries without additional funding from the bill.
- Counterparties and registries (donors, contract partners, charitable registries) — must update records and potentially refile materials that reference the Corps’ prior D.C. address, creating transactional friction and administrative expense.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between honoring the organization’s choice of a local legal home (and the clarity that creates for local stakeholders) and the administrative and jurisdictional friction that a statutory relocation creates when the bill provides no transition mechanics—shifting the charter’s legal touchpoints resolves one set of coordination problems while creating new compliance, filing, and litigation uncertainties that the statute does not address.
The bill solves a narrow problem—re-pointing the charter’s geographic references—but it leaves open a set of practical and legal questions that will fall to the organization and state authorities. Most notably, the measure does not include any transition rules, consent statements, or instructions about transfers of records, property, or registrations.
That omission means the Corps and its advisors must manage the migration in coordination with Illinois and federal officials and with attention to unrelated regimes (charitable solicitation law, tax filings, and any DC contracts that reference the old statutory domicile).
A second implementation issue concerns the interplay between a federal charter’s text and state corporation and nonprofit law. The bill changes statutory language, but it does not make the Corps a creature of Illinois law; states differ in how they treat federally chartered organizations for purposes of registration, taxation, and service.
The Corps and Illinois officials will need to determine whether any state filings, acceptance processes, or fee payments are necessary to operationalize the move. Finally, redirecting service of process to the Illinois Secretary of State could affect litigation strategy and venue where parties relied on prior D.C.-based mechanics—there is no guidance in the bill about handling pending suits or notices already perfected under the old language.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.