H. Con.
Res. 36 is a ceremonial concurrent resolution that records and honors the life and public service of Barbara Pierce Bush on the occasion of what would be her 100th birthday. The text collects biographical recitals — from her World War II factory work to her role as Second and First Lady, her establishment of the Barbara Bush Foundation for Family Literacy, and her involvement with the National Literacy Act of 1991 — and concludes with four short ‘‘resolved’’ clauses that commemorate and commend her.
The resolution creates no legal rights, obligations, programs, or funding. Its practical effect is symbolic: it places an official congressional acknowledgment into the legislative record, provides language that family members and literacy organizations can cite, and formalizes a centennial commemoration even though Barbara Bush died in 2018.
For practitioners, the bill is relevant mainly as an example of how Congress uses concurrent resolutions to memorialize public figures and to signal institutional support for policy themes — here, literacy — without creating statutory authority.
At a Glance
What It Does
The resolution assembles biographical ‘‘Whereas’’ findings and then adopts four short resolves: honoring Barbara Bush, recognizing her centennial, acknowledging her contributions to literacy, and celebrating her legacy. It is a concurrent resolution — adopted by both chambers — that carries no force of law or funding authority.
Who It Affects
Directly affected parties are largely symbolic: the Bush family, literacy nonprofits that may use the congressional recognition in outreach, and congressional offices that draft and submit such commemorations. Government agencies and private entities receive no new obligations or benefits under the text.
Why It Matters
Although ceremonial, the resolution registers Congress’s judgment in the official record and highlights literacy as a policy value tied to a well‑known public figure. That makes it a small but durable tool for shaping historical narrative and for organizations that want to point to congressional commendation in fundraising or communications.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
H. Con.
Res. 36 is a short, traditional congressional commemoration. The body of the resolution is a string of ‘‘Whereas’’ clauses that list milestones and public‑service highlights from Barbara Pierce Bush’s life — birthdate and schooling, wartime factory work, marriage and family, her role alongside George H.
W. Bush during diplomatic and political posts, renovations and social functions as Second Lady, founding a literacy foundation as First Lady, and her compassion for AIDS patients during a period of social hostility.
The recitals also note the family ties that made her the mother of a later president and record her date of death in 2018.
The operative part of the document consists of four short ‘‘Resolved’’ clauses. They do not authorize programs or spending; instead, they formally ‘‘honor,’’ ‘‘recognize,’’ ‘‘acknowledge,’’ and ‘‘celebrate’’ aspects of her life and public service.
Because the instrument is a concurrent resolution, it is meant to be agreed to by both the House and the Senate and would be printed in the Congressional Record, but it would not be presented to the President and would not create binding legal obligations.Practically, the resolution functions as an archival and communicative device. If adopted, staff will enter the text into the record, and sponsors may transmit copies to the family and to literacy organizations.
Those organizations can cite the congressional recognition in promotional materials or anniversary events. The resolution thereby converts a biographical narrative into an official congressional statement of esteem without changing law, budgets, or agency responsibilities.
The Five Things You Need to Know
H. Con. Res. 36 is a concurrent resolution — ceremonial by design — and does not create statutory rights, require agency action, or authorize spending.
The text compiles detailed recitals: her June 8, 1925 birth, schooling at Ashley Hall and Smith College, wartime factory work in 1943, marriage on January 6, 1945, family moves and roles alongside her husband, founding of the Barbara Bush Foundation for Family Literacy in 1989, and reference to the National Literacy Act of 1991.
The operative text contains four short resolves: (1) an honorific statement, (2) recognition of the 100th birthday and expressions of thanks, (3) an explicit acknowledgment of her impact on literacy, and (4) a declaration celebrating her legacy.
Representative August Pfluger introduced the measure on June 6, 2025, with ten listed cosponsors and a referral to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform as noted on the bill cover.
Although it commemorates a centennial (June 8, 2025), the resolution is posthumous — it records and celebrates a public figure who passed away on April 17, 2018, rather than creating a living‑person tribute or program.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Biographical findings and policy context
The preamble strings together chronological and thematic facts: birthplace and education; wartime work; marriage and family; support for her husband’s business and political career; renovations and social duties as Second Lady; literacy advocacy culminating in the Barbara Bush Foundation; and her role in the passage of the National Literacy Act of 1991. For practitioners, the important point is that the ‘‘Whereas’’ clauses frame the policy angle (literacy) that the resolves reinforce, but the recitals themselves carry no legal weight beyond being entered into the record.
Formal honorific
This clause directs Congress to ‘‘honor the life, achievements, and distinguished public service’’ of Barbara Bush. Mechanically this is a declarative statement only; it signals congressional esteem and becomes part of official proceedings but does not compel any executive or agency response.
Centennial recognition and commendation
Congress ‘‘recognizes’’ Barbara Bush on the occasion of her 100th birthday and ‘‘expresses thanks and commendations’’ to her and her family. The wording is intentionally broad to allow sponsors and communications teams to republish it in press materials and to provide a citation that family members or nonprofits can use, but it creates no entitlement or grant authority.
Acknowledgment of literacy impact
This clause specifically acknowledges her contributions toward promoting literacy and ‘‘uplifting her fellow citizens.’’ That targeted language links the commemorative act to an enduring public policy theme, effectively validating literacy organizations’ work by association without establishing oversight, goals, or funding.
Celebration of legacy
The final resolve celebrates her legacy as a ‘‘model citizen and public servant.’’ It closes the resolution with a broad normative statement intended for the historical record and ceremonial citation; its practical effects are limited to symbolism and archival use.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Bush family and descendants — they receive an official congressional statement of esteem that can be used in family archives, memorial materials, and public relations.
- Literacy nonprofits and the Barbara Bush Foundation for Family Literacy — the resolution ties congressional recognition to literacy advocacy, which may assist organizations in fundraising, partnerships, and public messaging.
- Members of Congress and staff who sponsor or cosponsor the text — they gain a ceremonial record that signals constituency values and can be used as a communications tool with voters who prioritize civic service and literacy.
Who Bears the Cost
- Congressional staff and committees — drafting, reviewing, and processing ceremonial resolutions consumes staff time and floor or committee schedule space, albeit modestly.
- Taxpayer funds for reproduction and administrative handling — printing, entering the text into the Congressional Record, and mailing copies to stakeholders entail minor administrative costs.
- Historical record‑keepers and archivists — placing commemorations into the record raises curation demands and obliges archival offices to reconcile multiple, sometimes overlapping memorials without clear prioritization.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between Congress’s role as a symbolic arbiter of national memory and its limited legislative bandwidth: honoring a widely admired figure and elevating a policy theme like literacy reinforces civic values and aids nonprofits, but doing so via non‑binding resolutions risks diverting scarce time and record space from substantive policymaking while producing only symbolic, not material, benefits.
The primary technical limitation of H. Con.
Res. 36 is its non‑binding nature: it creates recognition and record, not programs, duties, or appropriations. That matters because readers often conflate congressional attention with substantive policy change; this text grants symbolic legitimacy to literacy advocacy without producing measurable policy outputs.
A second tension is one of precedent and signal value. Congress issues many commemorative resolutions; each one consumes limited floor or committee attention and contributes to an ever‑expanding archive of honors.
Overuse can dilute the distinctiveness of congressional recognition and creates questions about selection criteria, historical scope, and representational balance. Finally, because the recitals summarize historical events, any factual errors or selective emphasis could become part of the official record, complicating corrections and scholarly debate.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.