This concurrent resolution authorizes the use of the United States Capitol rotunda for the lying in state of the remains of seven named Army service members who served in support of Operation Epic Fury. The resolution directs that the date be set by the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and directs the Architect of the Capitol, under their direction, to take all necessary steps to accomplish the purpose.
The provision is ceremonial rather than legislative: it creates an authorization for a high-profile honor that triggers interagency and congressional operational tasks — scheduling, security, logistical planning, and coordination with military ceremonial units — but it does not itself appropriate funds or change substantive law. The resolution is material to congressional staff, the Architect of the Capitol, Capitol Police, Department of Defense ceremonial and casualty offices, the families of the fallen, and veterans and civic organizations tracking ceremonial honors and precedent-setting uses of the rotunda.
At a Glance
What It Does
The resolution permits the remains of seven specified Army members to lie in state in the Capitol rotunda and names the President pro tempore and the Speaker as the officials to set the date. It directs the Architect of the Capitol to carry out whatever steps are necessary under the direction of those leaders.
Who It Affects
Directly affected parties include the families and units of the seven service members, congressional leadership and floor managers who set timing, the Architect of the Capitol and Capitol Police who handle logistics and security, and Department of Defense ceremonial units that coordinate honors and guards.
Why It Matters
Lying in state in the rotunda is one of the highest civic honors and requires interjurisdictional coordination across Congress, the Architect’s office, and the military; it also uses scarce ceremonial space and operational capacity and can set a precedent for future multi-service-member ceremonies.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The resolution performs one narrow but significant function: it authorizes the rotunda of the Capitol as the location for a lying-in-state ceremony for seven Army service members identified by name. Rather than prescribing a date or spelling out procedural minutiae, the text hands scheduling authority to the congressional leaders who customarily manage the Capitol calendar and asks the Architect of the Capitol to implement the logistics under their direction.
Because the resolution is concurrent, it reflects a bipartisan, ceremonial act of Congress rather than a statutory change. In practice that means the listed leaders and the Architect will need to coordinate with the Department of Defense for ceremonial details — the presence of a military escort or honor guard, flag protocols, and transfer of remains — while the Architect handles physical setup in the rotunda (catafalque placement, crowd flow, protective measures for the artwork and floors) and the Capitol Police manage security and public access.The resolution’s instruction that the Architect take "all necessary steps" is deliberately broad.
Expect implementation tasks typical of lying-in-state events: scheduling public visitation hours, erecting temporary barriers and scaffolding, arranging for ceremonial units and congressional representatives, and ensuring continuity with other scheduled Capitol events. It does not, however, create a funding mechanism; any overtime, security, or equipment costs must be absorbed within existing agency budgets or covered by separate appropriations.Although brief, the text has practical knock-on effects.
Blocking the rotunda for a several-hour or multi-day period affects tours, other ceremonial uses, and Capitol operations. It also contributes to institutional precedent: authorizing multiple members of the armed forces to lie in state at once raises operational questions about how often and under what standards Congress will use the rotunda for future military honors.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The resolution authorizes the Capitol rotunda to be used for the lying in state of seven named Army service members.
It lists the seven individuals by name: Major Jeffrey R. O’Brien; Captain Cody A. Khork; Chief Warrant Officer 3 Robert M. Marzan; Sergeant First Class Noah L. Tietjens; Sergeant First Class Nicole M. Amor; Sergeant Declan J. Coady; and Sergeant Benjamin N. Pennington.
The President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House must determine the date for the lying in state; the Architect of the Capitol implements the event under their direction.
The Architect of the Capitol is directed to take “all necessary steps” to accomplish the lying in state, giving the Architect broad operational responsibility for logistics, setup, and coordination with other agencies.
This is a concurrent resolution — ceremonial in nature — and does not itself appropriate funds or create binding statutory obligations.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Formal recognition of the service members
The opening lines identify and formally recognize the seven named soldiers and tie their service to Operation Epic Fury. Practically, this section functions as the resolution’s rationale; it memorializes the individuals and provides the explicit basis for the Capitol honor without creating additional criteria or eligibility rules.
Permits lying in state in the Capitol rotunda
This provision grants permission for the remains to lie in state in the rotunda. The plain text places no numerical limits or timeframes on how long the rotunda may be used, leaving those operational details to leaders and the Architect. That open-ended language gives flexibility but also pushes important scheduling and duration choices out of the resolution and into implementation.
Leadership sets date; Architect executes
The resolution assigns two discrete roles: the President pro tempore and the Speaker choose the date, and the Architect of the Capitol carries out necessary arrangements under their direction. That division reflects standard practice for Capitol ceremonies but concentrates logistical responsibility in the Architect’s office, which must coordinate with Capitol Police, congressional offices, and the Department of Defense to execute the event.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Veterans across all five countries.
Explore Veterans in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Families of the fallen — receive a public, high-profile congressional honor and formal recognition in the nation’s ceremonial space, which can be a central part of mourning and public remembrance.
- Army units and the broader military community — gain institutional recognition for their service members and a formal avenue for honors that reinforce service and unit cohesion.
- Veterans organizations and civic groups — obtain a focal public ceremony to which they can attach commemorative activities and outreach, increasing visibility for related causes.
- Members of Congress and congressional leadership — can publicly demonstrate support for service members and constituents, and use the ceremony for official expressions of grief and recognition.
Who Bears the Cost
- Architect of the Capitol — must plan and implement logistics, absorb operational burdens, and coordinate physical protections for the rotunda and its artwork.
- United States Capitol Police and security partners — shoulder additional security responsibilities, crowd management, and potential overtime costs for the duration of public visitation.
- Department of Defense (ceremonial and casualty offices) — provides honor guards, coordinates transfer and military elements of the ceremony, which consumes personnel and planning resources.
- House and Senate administrative staff — take on scheduling, liaison, and protocol tasks that add to regular duties and may require reallocation of staff time and resources.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between honoring fallen service members in a nationally symbolic venue and the finite, costly operational capacity of the Capitol: providing a high-profile, public ceremony satisfies commemoration and constituent expectations but imposes real logistical, security, and budgetary burdens on the Architect, Capitol Police, and DOD — with no funding or detailed procedures supplied by the resolution itself.
Two implementation issues stand out. First, the resolution does not appropriate money or specify who pays for overtime, temporary structures, or additional security; it simply delegates execution to the Architect.
In practice the Architect, Capitol Police, and DOD will either absorb the costs into existing budgets or seek separate appropriations or reprogramming — a process that can create timing friction and uncertainty for families and organizers.
Second, the language is brief and leaves key operational choices unspecified: how long the rotunda will be reserved, whether visitation will be open to the public or limited, and how this event will be prioritized relative to other scheduled Capitol uses. The authorization sets a precedent for using a limited ceremonial space for multiple military personnel at once, which may invite more such requests and force clearer institutional criteria for future cases.
There is also a practical tension between providing public access and ensuring security, preservation of the rotunda environment, and uninterrupted congressional business.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.