This joint resolution designates an annual Slavery Remembrance Day on August 20 to remind the nation of the evils of slavery and to condemn slavery and its enduring legacies. It also designates the measure as the Original Slavery Remembrance Day Resolution and calls on the President to issue a proclamation encouraging Americans to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
The provision is symbolic in nature, signaling national acknowledgment rather than creating new programs or funding.
At a Glance
What It Does
Designates August 20 as Slavery Remembrance Day each year and authorizes a presidential proclamation to guide national observances. It also explicitly condemns slavery and its harmful progenies.
Who It Affects
Directly affects the federal government and national institutions responsible for observances, as well as civil society organizations that organize remembrance events across the country.
Why It Matters
Creates a formal, recurring moment for national reflection on slavery's history and legacy, signaling a unified stance and encouraging public ceremonies without imposing new policy costs.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
HJR113 is a symbolic, non-funding measure that declares August 20 as Slavery Remembrance Day, to be observed nationwide through ceremonies and activities. The bill’s operative action is Section 2, which designates the day and calls on the President to issue a proclamation guiding observances.
Section 1 provides the short title, the Original Slavery Remembrance Day Resolution. The bill’s long preamble—that runs through the “Whereas” clauses—lays out historical context and examples of the harms caused by slavery, underscoring why a formal day of remembrance matters.
Because it is a joint resolution, the designation expresses congressional intent rather than creating new federal programs or spending, relying on the executive proclamation to marshal observances.
Observers should note that the bill’s impact rests on ceremonial and educational activities rather than regulatory or fiscal mandates. The designation is designed to stimulate remembrance, education, and dialogue across communities, museums, schools, and faith-based and civil society organizations, without prescribing specific programs or funding streams.
The text repeatedly emphasizes condemnation of slavery and its legacies and invites broad participation across the country.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill designates August 20 as Slavery Remembrance Day each year.
It requires and requests the President to issue a proclamation observing the day.
It designates the measure with the short title ‘Original Slavery Remembrance Day Resolution.’, It condemns slavery and its evil progenies and calls for remembrance.
It is a Joint Resolution signaling congressional intent to observe the day, not a new federal program with funding.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
Section 1 designates the measure’s official short title as the “Original Slavery Remembrance Day Resolution.” This naming establishes the formal tag by which the resolution will be cited and discussed in future references.
Slavery Remembrance Day designation and proclamation
Section 2 designates an annual Slavery Remembrance Day on August 20 to remind the nation of the evils of slavery and its enduring legacies. It also commands the condemnation of slavery and its progenies, encourages acknowledgement of slavery remembrance, and authorizes and requests the President to issue a proclamation urging nationwide observances with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Culture across all five countries.
Explore Culture in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Public schools and universities can incorporate remembrance content into curricula and host related events, expanding educational engagement with enslaved history.
- National museums, historical societies, and cultural institutions can organize exhibitions and programs centered on slavery and abolition, enriching public discourse.
- Civil rights organizations and memory-work groups gain a formal channel to promote education and community dialogue about slavery's legacy and its ongoing impacts.
- Local and state governments can host remembrance ceremonies and partner with community groups to foster intergenerational learning and community resilience.
- Faith-based organizations and community groups can coordinate remembrance events, service programs, and interfaith dialogues that reflect on justice and reconciliation.
Who Bears the Cost
- Executive Office of the President bears administrative costs associated with drafting and issuing the proclamation.
- Federal agencies and staff involved in communications and ceremonial coordination may incur modest administrative costs to publicize observances.
- State and local governments that choose to host events or ceremonies may incur logistical costs (permits, venues, staffing) as part of voluntary observances.
- Educational and cultural institutions that organize commemorations may incur event-related costs (program development, guest speakers, exhibits).
- Media outlets and publishers covering national remembrance activities may incur production and distribution costs when participating in observances.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between symbolism and substance: a formal national remembrance day signals acknowledgment of slavery’s harm without committing funding or creating concrete programs, leaving implementation to presidential proclamation and local actors, which can yield uneven observance across communities.
The bill’s mechanism is largely ceremonial. Because it relies on a presidential proclamation rather than funding or new programs, its practical impact depends on executive action and local implementation.
The long preambular material (the “Whereas” clauses) frames slavery’s history and its consequences but does not create binding obligations on states or private actors. This design choice preserves flexibility but limits enforceable standards or resources.
The central policy question is whether a symbolic observance, without accompanying funding or policy tools, sufficiently advances public education and national reflection on slavery’s legacy. This can be a strength—ensuring broad uptake without rigid mandates—or a limitation if communities struggle to translate symbolism into action.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.