This resolution provides a not-to-exceed budget for the Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party in the 119th Congress. It covers the expenses of all staff salaries and related committee operations, up to a total of $10,740,218.
The funding is drawn from the House of Representatives’ applicable accounts and is subject to standard House controls. The bill then specifies two distinct session-based spending windows and a voucher-based payment mechanism, with oversight by the Committee on House Administration.
At a Glance
What It Does
Sets a not-to-exceed cap of $10,740,218 for the Select Committee’s expenses in the 119th Congress, including staff salaries and operations, and outlines the process for distributing those funds.
Who It Affects
Directly affects the Select Committee, its staff, and the House Administration’s budget processes and voucher approvals.
Why It Matters
Provides a transparent, auditable funding framework that enables timely staffing and operation of the committee while preserving congressional budget discipline.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates a formal spending envelope for the Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party in the 119th Congress. It caps the committee’s total expenses, including personnel costs, at $10,740,218 and directs that the money come from the House’s existing committee accounts.
This creates a clear, auditable ceiling for the committee’s operations during this Congress.
The resolution divides the funding into two distinct session periods with precise caps: $5,366,830 for the period ending January 3, 2026, and $5,373,388 for the period ending January 3, 2027. It also mandates that payments be made only on vouchers approved by the Select Committee and signed by its Chairman, with oversight and direction provided by the Committee on House Administration.
Finally, the bill requires that all expenditures be conducted in accordance with regulations prescribed by the House Administration. Taken together, these provisions establish a disciplined, voucher-driven funding mechanism designed to support committee operations while preserving House controls over spending.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill sets a not-to-exceed cap of $10,740,218 for the Select Committee’s expenses in the 119th Congress.
Section 2 divides funds into two session-based caps: $5,366,830 (2025–2026) and $5,373,388 (2026–2027).
Payments must be made on vouchers authorized by the Select Committee and signed by its Chairman, with approval by the House Administration.
Expenditures must be in line with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House Administration.
This resolution applies specifically to the Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party in the 119th Congress.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Funding cap for Select Committee expenses
Section 1 establishes a not-to-exceed total for the Select Committee’s expenses at $10,740,218 for the 119th Congress. It explicitly covers the expenses of all staff salaries and the committee’s operating costs, to be paid out of the House’s committee salaries and expenses accounts. This creates a single budget envelope that governs the committee’s personnel and operational spending for the entire Congress.
Session-based funding limits
Section 2 provides the pacing for the funds by two defined session windows. Not more than $5,366,830 shall be available for expenses incurred during the period from January 3, 2025, through January 3, 2026, and not more than $5,373,388 shall be available for expenses incurred during the period from January 3, 2026, through January 3, 2027. These caps create intermediate spending checkpoints that align with the congressional calendar.
Voucher process
Section 3 requires that payments under the resolution be made on vouchers authorized by the Select Committee, signed by the Committee’s Chairman, and approved as directed by the Committee on House Administration. This ties disbursement to a formal internal authorization and a centralized administrative review process.
Regulatory framework
Section 4 requires that all amounts be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House Administration. This ensures consistency with House-wide rules on procurement, payroll, and administrative spending and maintains oversight of how funds are used.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Select Committee staff, whose salaries and operational needs are funded by a dedicated budget to enable research and deliberation on US-China strategic competition.
- The Committee Chair and Members, who rely on timely staffing and resources to conduct hearings, briefings, and oversight activities.
- The Committee on House Administration and House financial officers, who gain clear rules and a straightforward voucher process for disbursements.
- The House as an institution, which benefits from transparent budgeting and auditable spending related to a high-profile oversight function.
Who Bears the Cost
- House of Representatives operating funds that support the committee’s salaries and expenses.
- Administrative overhead within the House Administration budget dedicated to processing vouchers and enforcing regulations.
- Federal taxpayers, as the ultimate source of funding for congressional operations and oversight.
- Vendors and service providers paid through the committee’s vouchers, whose invoices are subject to the House’s payment controls.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether a fixed, source-controlled budget with formal voucher oversight can accommodate the dynamic staffing and research needs of a high-priority oversight committee without unduly constraining its ability to act.
The resolution creates a tight budget envelope and clear spending windows, which is good for discipline but may limit the committee’s flexibility if urgent needs arise. Because costs must stay within the defined caps and be disbursed via vouchers approved under House Administration regulations, the committee could face delays or pressure to triage spending during a busy reporting cycle.
The two-session cap structure also raises questions about how it would adapt to unforeseen workloads or shifting investigations within the 119th Congress.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.