H. Res. 1044 is a simple, nonbinding House resolution that declares 2026 the "National Year of the Volunteer." The text collects findings about the civic value of volunteering, the recent decline in volunteer rates, and the role of volunteer organizations, and it calls on federal, state, local entities, nonprofits, schools, veterans’ groups, and companies to promote and participate in volunteer activities tied to the Nation’s 250th anniversary.
The measure matters because it links an official national observance to recruitment and awareness efforts at a time when many civic organizations report shortages of volunteers. The resolution does not appropriate funds or create new programs; its practical effect will depend on whether public agencies, private institutions, and philanthropy translate the designation into funded campaigns, coordinated recruiting, or operational support for understaffed volunteer providers.
At a Glance
What It Does
The resolution records congressional findings about volunteerism and formally declares 2026 the "National Year of the Volunteer," urging public agencies, nonprofits, schools, veterans’ groups, and companies to promote volunteer activities tied to the U.S. 250th anniversary. It contains no funding, regulatory mandates, or enforcement mechanisms.
Who It Affects
Directly referenced stakeholders include volunteer fire and EMS departments, scout troops, youth sports, houses of worship, food banks, shelters, mentoring programs, schools, veterans’ groups, and private-sector employers encouraged to engage in volunteer activities. Federal, state, and local governments are urged to highlight opportunities but aren’t given new statutory duties.
Why It Matters
The resolution uses the semiquincentennial as a focal point to revive public attention to volunteer recruitment and retention. For practitioners, its value lies in signaling and convening potential partners—useful for fundraising, awareness campaigns, and cross-sector planning—while leaving operational and fiscal commitments to other actors.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
H. Res. 1044 is a ceremonial House resolution: it compiles a set of findings about how volunteers contribute to public safety, health, education, and civic life, notes a decline in national volunteer rates (with COVID–19 named as a factor), and points to specific categories of civic organizations that report recruitment and retention difficulties.
The text explicitly ties this push to the Nation’s 250th anniversary and to programs run by the United States Semiquincentennial Commission, including the America Gives initiative that has been tracking volunteer hours.
The operative language is five short 'Resolved' clauses. They do not create programs or new authorities; instead the resolution endorses the idea of a yearlong observance, honors volunteers, urges government at all levels to promote opportunities, encourages nonprofits and private entities to partner on volunteer activities, and calls on Americans to participate in acts of service.
Because there is no appropriation or regulatory text, federal agencies receive only an exhortation rather than a directive to act or a funding stream to implement new initiatives.Practically, the designation is a messaging and coordination tool. State and local governments, philanthropic funders, national nonprofits, school systems, and corporations can use the resolution as a federal endorsement to justify marketing campaigns, volunteer recruitment drives, service-learning expansions, or cross-sector coalitions.
The resolution also references existing semiquincentennial infrastructure—most directly the Commission and the America Gives effort—which provides an existing vehicle for tracking and promotion even though the resolution itself does not expand that work.For compliance and operations teams at nonprofits and public agencies, the resolution's lack of enforcement or funding means any obligations arise through voluntary partnerships, memoranda of understanding, or internal policy decisions. Organizations considering scaling volunteer programs in response should plan for recruitment, training, background screening, liability management, and the administrative costs that accompany larger volunteer rosters—responsibilities the resolution highlights but does not underwrite.
The Five Things You Need to Know
H. Res. 1044 is a House simple resolution introduced on February 9, 2026 (119th Congress) that declares 2026 the "National Year of the Volunteer" but creates no legal entitlements or funding.
The text contains five 'Resolved' clauses: it endorses the designation, honors volunteers, urges federal/state/local promotion, encourages nonprofits/schools/veterans’ groups/companies to partner, and calls on Americans to serve.
The bill’s preamble cites the United States Semiquincentennial Commission Act of 2016 (Public Law 114–196) and the Commission’s America Gives initiative, noting that the Commission tracked volunteer hours for participants.
The resolution documents a recent decline in national volunteer rates and lists specific at-risk civic providers—volunteer fire/EMS, scouts, youth sports, food banks, shelters, and mentoring programs—framing the designation as a recruitment response.
Congressional action is symbolic: the resolution was referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce and includes no appropriations, reporting requirements, or enforcement mechanisms.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Findings on the importance and decline of volunteerism
This section aggregates the factual findings that justify the observance: volunteers’ roles in safety, health, education, and civic life; volunteerism’s economic value; the decline in volunteer rates (with COVID–19 cited as a contributing factor); and specific kinds of organizations struggling to recruit. For practitioners, the list signals which service areas a designation campaign will target and the existing pain points—useful when prioritizing outreach or matching grants.
Link to the 250th anniversary and America Gives
The text anchors the volunteer year to the United States’ 250th anniversary and explicitly references the Semiquincentennial Commission and its America Gives initiative. That linkage matters because it points to existing national-level messaging and tracking infrastructure that states, nonprofits, and funders can plug into, even though the resolution itself does not expand the Commission’s statutory powers or budget.
What Congress is urging but not mandating
The five operative clauses express support for the designation, honor volunteers, and urge action by governmental levels and civil-society actors. Because the language is hortatory (encouraging rather than commanding), it creates no compliance obligations. Its practical utility is therefore political and promotional—organizations can cite congressional encouragement when seeking partners or funding, but the resolution does not change legal duties or funding flows.
Introduced and referred to committee; no statutory effect
Formally, the resolution was introduced by Representative Michael Lawler and referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce. As a House resolution (H. Res.), it expresses the chamber’s sentiment but carries no force of law beyond that expression. That procedural status is important for stakeholders assessing what operational changes, if any, they should expect to follow from the designation.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Social Services across all five countries.
Explore Social Services in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Volunteer-dependent nonprofit organizations — The designation can amplify recruitment messaging and justify targeted campaigns or grant applications aimed at volunteer retention and expansion.
- Semiquincentennial Commission and America Gives partners — The resolution reinforces existing national branding and may increase participation in America Gives tracking and outreach efforts.
- Schools and youth programs — Service-learning and civic-education programs can leverage the national observance to expand curricula and student volunteer opportunities.
- Corporations with CSR programs — Companies can use the federal endorsement to scale employee volunteer programs and publicize corporate-community partnerships.
- Community emergency services (volunteer fire/EMS) — Local emergency providers who struggle to recruit may receive renewed volunteer interest or local policy support prompted by the national campaign.
Who Bears the Cost
- State and local governments — While urged to promote volunteerism, they may face incremental budgetary and staff costs for outreach, coordination, and background-check infrastructure without federal funding.
- Small nonprofits — Organizations asked to absorb more volunteers will incur onboarding, training, supervision, and liability-management expenses that the resolution does not underwrite.
- Employers and corporations — Businesses encouraged to engage may face operational disruptions and administrative costs when releasing employees for volunteer time or running company-wide programs.
- Philanthropic funders and intermediaries — Foundations or volunteer-matching platforms that step in to coordinate national efforts may need to reallocate grant dollars or staff to scale campaigns.
- Federal agencies (informational role) — Agencies asked to highlight opportunities may need to dedicate communications resources to align messaging with the observance despite no new appropriations.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances symbolic national mobilization against the absence of material support: it promotes a broad civic goal—reviving volunteerism at the semiquincentennial—while stopping short of providing funding or mandates, leaving the work to under-resourced nonprofits, local governments, and voluntary private-sector partners.
The resolution is a messaging vehicle, not a funding instrument. That creates a central implementation gap: it asks a long list of actors to act while providing no new money, reporting requirements, or programmatic authority.
The result is likely piecemeal action—some jurisdictions and private partners will seize the moment, others will not—producing uneven national impact relative to the symbolic ambition.
A second tension concerns capacity. Many of the organizations the text names as most at risk—volunteer fire/EMS, small food banks, shelters, and mentoring programs—already report stretched administrative capacity.
Increasing volunteer headcount without simultaneous investment in training, vetting, scheduling, and liability protections risks creating more management burden and potential service disruptions. Finally, the resolution leans on existing semiquincentennial infrastructure (America Gives) for tracking and promotion, but it does not resolve who will standardize metrics, verify reported hours, or fund the back-end systems necessary for large-scale national coordination.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.