HR1048, introduced February 10, 2026, resolves that the named Member, Mr. Menefee, be elected to the standing Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. The measure specifies that he is to rank immediately after Mr. Riley of New York in the committee’s roster.
The action is formalized by an Attest clause from the Clerk, making the membership change effective through House action. This is a straightforward roster adjustment with no accompanying policy changes or funding provisions.
At a Glance
What It Does
The resolution elects Mr. Menefee to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and places him in the roster immediately after Mr. Riley of New York.
Who It Affects
Directly affects the Science Committee membership and staff, and the named member’s office and district staff will engage with committee operations.
Why It Matters
Rooster placement can influence committee dynamics, scheduling, and assignment potential. This action formalizes a membership change within the committee’s existing structure.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
HR1048 is a simple procedural resolution that adds a new member to the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee. It designates Mr. Menefee as a member and specifies his placement in the roster, immediately after Mr. Riley of New York.
The move is finalized by the Clerk’s attestation, signaling official acceptance of the change. There are no policy provisions, funding directives, or substantive legislative changes attached to this text.
As a roster adjustment, the bill affects who sits on the committee and in what order—factors that can influence participation in hearings and drafting of legislation within the committee’s jurisdiction. Because the action is limited to membership, the practical impact lies in access to committee resources and potential influence over committee workload, not in altering powers or policy outcomes.In short, HR1048 is a formal membership action designed to update the committee’s composition.
It does not modify authority, budget, or policy mandates beyond recognizing a new member and defining his ranking on the Science Committee roster.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill elects Mr. Menefee to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Mr. Menefee is placed to rank immediately after Mr. Riley of New York.
This is enacted as a House Resolution (H.Res. 1048).
The introduction date is February 10, 2026, in the 119th Congress.
The Clerk’s attestation completes the change in membership.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Election to the Standing Committee
This section states that the named Member—Mr. Menefee—is elected to the standing Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. It identifies the committee in question and confirms that the member is now part of the roster. The practical effect is to grant Mr. Menefee full membership status on the committee and to enable participation in the committee’s proceedings.
Roster Ranking
This section specifies the exact placement of the new member within the committee’s lineup: Mr. Menefee ranks immediately after Mr. Riley of New York. Ranking can influence seating, speaking order, and potential assignment opportunities within the committee’s oversight and legislative activity, even though no policy changes accompany the action.
Attestation and Formalization
This final section notes that the action is formalized by Attest: Clerk. The Clerk’s attestation signifies official enrollment of Mr. Menefee onto the committee roster, completing the procedural requirement for the appointment.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Mr. Menefee and his staff gain formal committee membership, enabling participation in hearings, markups, and related duties.
- Mr. Menefee’s constituents benefit from his enhanced access to Science Committee-led oversight and potential influence on legislation within the committee’s jurisdiction.
- The Science, Space, and Technology Committee gains a defined, current roster that supports clear scheduling and governance of its activities.
- Committee staff gain a well-defined assignment of duties and a clarified workflow due to updated membership.
Who Bears the Cost
- No explicit fiscal cost is imposed by the bill, but minor administrative overhead accompanies roster updates and information system adjustments.
- Other members of the committee may experience shifts in ranking or assignment opportunities, which could affect their scheduling and workload.
- If the roster changes require procedural updates (e.g., hearings, seating charts), staff time and logistics must be allocated to reflect the new membership.
- There is potential for brief administrative disruption as personnel update rosters and official records.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Does a simple roster update meaningfully alter the balance of influence on the committee, or is it merely a clerical adjustment that should be accompanied by further policy and governance details to ensure transparency and predictability?
The bill provides a narrow, procedural adjustment with limited direct policy impact. Its primary tension lies in how roster changes translate into practical influence for committee work—such as hearing assignments, subcommittee access, and leadership dynamics—without altering any statutory powers or funding.
The text does not specify term limits, subcommittee assignments, or any related governance mechanics, leaving those questions to existing rules and later action if needed.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.