H. Res. 1140 is a House floor rule resolution that puts H.R. 5408 — a bill to accelerate workplace time-to-contract under the National Labor Relations Act — directly on the House floor for immediate consideration.
The resolution waives points of order against both consideration and the bill’s provisions, treats the bill as read, limits debate, and preserves a single motion to recommit.
That combination compresses the House’s procedural calendar and reduces opportunities for extended amendment, formal challenges, or delay. For practitioners and stakeholders tracking H.R. 5408, the resolution matters because it shifts the contest from procedural maneuvering to substantive floor debate controlled by committee leadership and speeds transmission of any House passage to the Senate.
At a Glance
What It Does
The resolution orders immediate floor consideration of H.R. 5408, deems the bill as read, waives points of order against consideration and against provisions, limits debate to one hour split and controlled by the Education and Workforce Committee chair and ranking member (or designees), and allows one motion to recommit.
Who It Affects
Directly affected are House floor managers, members of the Committee on Education and Workforce, the House Rules and Parliamentarian offices, and sponsors and opponents of H.R. 5408. Indirectly affected are external stakeholders—labor unions, employers, and industry lobbyists—who will have less time to influence amendments or debate.
Why It Matters
By removing procedural obstacles and shortening debate, the resolution reduces the time available for technical, legal, and stakeholder scrutiny and concentrates control with committee leaders and floor managers. That materially changes legislative strategy for supporters and opponents and increases the odds that the House will act quickly on H.R. 5408.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
This is a straight procedural vehicle: as soon as the House adopts H. Res. 1140, the chamber must take up H.R. 5408 on the floor without any preliminary hurdles.
The resolution explicitly waives all points of order against putting the bill up for consideration and against the bill’s substantive provisions, and it instructs the House to consider the text as already read — meaning no formal reading slows the process.
Debate is tightly constrained. The resolution orders the previous question (a motion that forces a final vote) to be in place on the bill and any amendment to final passage without intervening motions except for one hour of debate split equally and controlled by the chair and ranking member of the Education and Workforce Committee (or their designees) and one motion to recommit.
That structure preserves a limited avenue for minority opposition via a single motion to recommit while denying broader amendment or dilatory motions.The resolution also carves out two identified House rules—clause 1(c) of Rule XIX and clause 8 of Rule XX—from applying to this consideration, removing specified procedural constraints for this particular bill. Finally, the Clerk must notify the Senate that the House passed H.R. 5408 no later than three calendar days after passage, which formalizes a rapid cross‑chamber notification designed to accelerate subsequent Senate action.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The resolution directs immediate floor consideration of H.R. 5408 upon adoption of H. Res. 1140.
All points of order against consideration of the bill and against any provision in the bill are waived; the bill is considered as read.
Debate is limited to one hour, equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Education and Workforce or their designees.
Only one motion to recommit is preserved; other intervening motions are out of order once debate starts.
Clause 1(c) of Rule XIX and clause 8 of Rule XX are suspended for this consideration, and the Clerk must transmit a message to the Senate that the House has passed H.R. 5408 within three calendar days.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Order of consideration, reading, and debate limits
This section moves H.R. 5408 to the floor immediately after the resolution’s adoption, treats the bill as read (so no formal recitation of text is required), and sets the previous question to force final passage on the bill and any amendment. Practically, this cuts off the standard sequence of motions and parliamentary delays that can expand floor time, concentrating the window for substantive engagement into a single, capped debate period.
Who controls debate and what remedial motions remain
The resolution allocates one hour of debate, divided equally and to be controlled by the Committee on Education and Workforce’s chair and ranking minority member or their designees. By giving control to committee leadership rather than the broader membership, floor managers can prioritize particular amendments or speakers and limit procedural interruptions. The only preserved post-debate remedy for the minority is one motion to recommit; all other intervening motions are precluded.
Suspension of two House rule clauses
Section 2 states that clause 1(c) of Rule XIX and clause 8 of Rule XX do not apply to the consideration of H.R. 5408. The resolution thus removes specific procedural constraints that would otherwise govern debate or amendment for this bill. While the text does not recite the operative language of those clauses, the practical effect is to narrow the range of rule-based objections and to streamline floor processing for this measure.
Expedited notification to the Senate
This short provision requires the Clerk to transmit to the Senate a message that the House has passed H.R. 5408 no later than three calendar days after House passage. That creates an administrative deadline to put the Senate on notice quickly and is aimed at hastening bicameral consideration and any required action in the upper chamber.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Sponsor and House proponents of H.R. 5408 — The resolution increases the probability of a swift House vote on their legislation and limits procedural avenues opponents can use to delay or amend the bill.
- House Majority leadership and floor managers — Leadership gains control over timing and debate, enabling calendar management and strategic momentum for priority legislation.
- Committee on Education and Workforce leadership — By controlling debate and limiting outside amendments, the committee’s recommendations and negotiated text are more likely to remain intact on the floor.
- External supporters (labor organizations or trade groups aligned with the bill) — Faster floor consideration reduces the window opponents have to mount public campaigns or legal-technical challenges to specific provisions.
- Senate schedulers (indirectly) — The three-day transmission requirement provides the Senate formal notice quickly, allowing its leadership to plan any follow-up work without administrative delay.
Who Bears the Cost
- House members outside the committee and rank-and-file opponents — Members lose opportunities to offer amendments, extend debate, or pursue procedural points of order that can reshape legislation.
- House Minority leadership and dissenting members — Waivers of points of order and curtailed debate reduce minority leverage and parliamentary tools to force compromises.
- Parliamentarian and legislative counsel offices — Condensed timelines increase pressure on staff to vet technical legality and drafting issues with less time for review.
- External stakeholders opposed to H.R. 5408 — Accelerated floor action shortens windows for targeted lobbying, coalition building, or public mobilization.
- Transparency and deliberative advocates — The procedural compressions limit extended committee or floor scrutiny that typically surfaces implementation complexities or unintended consequences.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between procedural speed and legislative scrutiny: the resolution expedites House action on a labor‑related bill by cutting off routine parliamentary safeguards, which helps proponents achieve a quick vote but reduces opportunities for detailed review, amendment, and minority influence—a trade-off between efficiency and deliberation.
The resolution is narrowly procedural but carries consequential trade-offs. Speed comes at the cost of reduced floor-level scrutiny: waiving points of order and treating the bill as read mean fewer formal checks on drafting defects, jurisdictional conflicts, or noncompliance with standing House requirements.
If technical or compliance problems exist in H.R. 5408, the compressed schedule makes them harder to catch and harder for members to fix through amendment on the floor.
Concentrating debate control with committee leadership and preserving only a single motion to recommit shifts leverage toward those leaders and away from rank-and-file members and organized opponents. That produces efficiency for sponsors but increases the risk that substantive objections will be litigated later—either in conference with the Senate, during implementation, or through public controversy—rather than resolved in open floor amendment.
The requirement to notify the Senate within three days formalizes administrative speed but does not guarantee concurrent or sympathetic action in the Senate, which can still slow or alter the bill’s fate.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.