Codify — Article

House resolution calls for fair pay and working conditions for paraprofessionals

Expresses the House's sense that paraprofessionals and education support staff deserve livable wages, affordable health care, job security, and meaningful input in school policy.

The Brief

This resolution declares the sense of the House that paraprofessionals and education support staff should receive fair compensation and strong working conditions. It highlights the essential role these workers play in schools and school communities and catalogues a series of aspirational standards—from livable wages and affordable health care to written contracts with multi-year security and paid leave for family or weather-related closures.

The resolution also calls for professional development during regular hours, access to necessary resources and protective equipment, and opportunities for input on policy decisions that affect their work.

While non-binding, the resolution elevates concrete expectations for employers and districts, and it signals a policy priority around stable staffing, worker safety, and professional growth. It also emphasizes workers’ rights to organize, engage in good-faith bargaining, and avoid retaliation or punitive actions when raising concerns or participating in protests or strikes.

The overall aim is to improve school climate and student outcomes by elevating the status and conditions of paraprofessionals and education support staff.

At a Glance

What It Does

States, in non-binding terms, that paraprofessionals and education support staff deserve livable wages, affordable health care, FMLA coverage, 16 weeks of paid family leave, paid leave for closures, professional development during paid hours, adequate resources, PPE, representation, input on AI/monitoring, participation in IEP and related meetings, safe workplaces, sufficient staffing, job-security provisions, renewal contracts with just-cause protections, and retaliation-free reporting.

Who It Affects

Directly affects paraprofessionals and education support staff in elementary, middle, and high schools; also implicates school districts, local education agencies, and the unions or associations that represent these workers.

Why It Matters

Sets aspirational standards for a critical support workforce, aiming to stabilize staffing, raise compensation, and give workers a voice in school policy. Signals a shift toward more formal recognition of frontline educational staff and creates expectations that could influence future policy and funding discussions.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill is a House resolution expressing the sense of Congress that paraprofessionals and education support staff deserve and should be afforded certain protections and benefits. It lays out a comprehensive set of expectations covering compensation, health care, job security, and workplace conditions.

Key items include a livable and competitive wage, access to high-quality health care at minimal personal cost, eligibility for the Family and Medical Leave Act, and 16 weeks of paid family and medical leave. It also calls for paid leave for planned and unforeseen school closures, ongoing professional development during regular working hours, up-to-date resources and technology, and access to PPE and safe working conditions.

The resolution emphasizes that workers should have representation in organizations that set policies affecting their working conditions and should receive input on the use of electronic monitoring, data, algorithms, and AI technologies in schools. It also requires meaningful participation in IEP meetings, behavior intervention team discussions, and related processes to the extent permitted by law.

In addition to these protections, it calls for adequate staffing levels to support students and a process for reporting workplace issues without retaliation, as well as an employment contract structure that favors renewal and just-cause termination rather than at-will dismissal. Finally, the resolution endorses the principle of collective bargaining with employers in good faith, preserving the right to bargain without retaliatory actions or anti-union practices.Although non-binding, the measures reflect a policy aspiration to improve working conditions in education and to align paraprofessional employment with broader standards seen in the education sector.

The text reinforces the importance of a stable, well-supported frontline workforce for safe, effective schools and for supporting student learning and well-being.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The resolution calls for livable, competitive wages for paraprofessionals and education support staff.

2

It requires access to high-quality health care with minimal personal costs.

3

It designates FMLA eligibility and 16 weeks of paid family and medical leave.

4

It mandates paid leave for closures and prioritizes paid professional development hours.

5

It ensures workers have input on AI, data policies, and are represented in policy discussions that affect their roles.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Part 1

Preamble and sense of the House

This section explains the purpose of the resolution and frames paraprofessionals and education support staff as essential frontline workers in schools. It emphasizes their diverse roles—from instructional support to nutrition, transportation, and maintenance—while noting the broader impact on students and communities. The practical takeaway is that Congress seeks to elevate the status of these workers and recognize their contributions, setting the tone for the rest of the resolution.

Section 1

Wages and compensation expectations

Paraprofessionals and education support staff should be paid a livable, competitive wage. The provision foregrounds wage adequacy as a baseline for ensuring staff retention and the ability to meet family needs, tying compensation directly to the stability of school operations and student outcomes.

Section 2

Benefits and health care access

The resolution affirms eligibility for health care with affordable premiums or minimal personal costs. It connects compensation to broader benefits, including health coverage, as part of establishing a sustainable employment model for frontline school staff.

4 more sections
Section 3

Family and medical leave and scheduling

The measure calls for 16 weeks of paid family and medical leave, and paid leave for planned and unplanned school closures. It also highlights the importance of predictable schedules and sufficient hours to maintain benefits and job security, reducing turnover and last-minute staffing disruptions.

Section 4

Professional development and resources

The text requires meaningful, on-the-job professional development during regular hours and access to up-to-date technology and supplies. It also emphasizes training for new technologies, including AI tools, to ensure staff can adapt and stay safe and effective in their roles.

Section 5

Workplace safety, staffing, and contract terms

The resolution calls for a safe, healthy work environment, adequate staffing levels, and notice of employment duration. It promotes renewal-based contracts with just-cause termination, reducing at-will uncertainty and supporting a stable workforce.

Section 6

Collective bargaining and policy input

Employers should engage in good-faith bargaining, with protections against retaliation and without undermining the rights for staff to bargain collectively. The resolution also states that existing collective bargaining agreements that are more favorable to workers are not superseded by this non-binding provision.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Education across all five countries.

Explore Education in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Paraprofessionals and education support staff gain livable wages, benefits, and job security that align with their critical roles in schools.
  • Students and families experience greater stability and continuity in education as staff retention improves.
  • School districts and local education agencies benefit from reduced turnover, improved morale, and more consistent classroom support.
  • Education unions and professional associations gain formal acknowledgment of workers’ input in policy decisions and workplace governance.
  • Administrators gain clearer expectations for workforce planning and professional development pathways.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Local education agencies and school districts face higher personnel costs associated with increased wages, benefits, and staff security, which may require budget adjustments or funding.
  • States and local governments could see expanded costs for health benefits and compliance initiatives.
  • Small or rural districts might experience greater financial strain from broader compensation and benefit commitments.
  • Procurement costs for equipment, PPE, and technology upgrades may rise to support improved working conditions.
  • Administrative costs for implementing input mechanisms and reporting processes could increase.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The core tension is between elevating working conditions for paraprofessionals and education support staff and the practical realities of school district budgets. The aspirational nature of the resolution relies on fiscal support and cooperative bargaining to translate ideals into stable, enforceable practice.

The resolution advances aspirational standards for a frontline education workforce but does not include a funding mechanism. This creates a potential gap between policy goals and fiscal capacity at the district or state level.

Implementing the provisions would require funding streams, bargaining, and administrative capacity to monitor and enforce the suggested protections and input rights. A central question is how districts will fund livable wages, comprehensive health coverage, extended paid leave, and ongoing professional development without compromising core educational programs or leading to layoffs elsewhere.

The proposal also depends on voluntary collective bargaining dynamics, which may vary by district and union strength, potentially leading to uneven adoption across jurisdictions.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.