This House resolution recognizes a mass incarceration crisis and proposes a broad, federal blueprint for decarceration and reform. It demands a participatory, community-led process to repeal punitive policies and replace them with a holistic, public health–centered approach to safety.
It also outlines concrete mechanisms to reduce confinement, end wealth-based penalties, and direct investment into housing, healthcare, education, and social services. Finally, it calls for reimagining policing, immigration detention, and accountability structures to dismantle systemic inequities and support impacted communities.
At a Glance
What It Does
The resolution instructs the federal government to pursue a large-scale decarceration effort, implement decriminalization across several areas, cap confinement, end the death penalty and mandatory minimums, and replace market-driven detention with community-centered supports. It also proposes wealth-discrimination reforms (no cash bail, fines/fees elimination) and major investments in housing, healthcare, education, and job guarantees.
Who It Affects
Directly affects people currently in custody, people awaiting trial, returning citizens, families of the incarcerated, immigrants in detention, and communities disproportionately harmed by policing. It also touches federal and state agencies, public defenders, and organizations engaged in criminal legal reform and community services.
Why It Matters
The measure seeks to structurally shift public safety away from mass incarceration and toward humane, equitable policies. By addressing racial disparities, economic inequities, and the social determinants of safety, it aims to reduce harms across families and communities while reorienting criminal justice toward prevention, treatment, and restoration.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The resolution frames mass incarceration as a national crisis and sets forth a comprehensive plan to reimagine the U.S. justice system. It emphasizes a participatory approach in which directly impacted communities help shape policy through assemblies, listening sessions, and community-led legislation drafting.
The core aim is to replace punitive, carceral policies with a holistic public-health and safety framework that prioritizes dignity, equity, and prevention over punishment.
The bill lays out several transformative mechanisms. It calls for decriminalization across multiple domains—such as sex work, addiction, homelessness, poverty, and immigration violations—while expanding diversion programs, restorative justice, and treatment options to minimize courtroom involvement and avoid prison time for most offenses.
It also proposes capping prison sentences for nonserious crimes, ending the death penalty and mandatory minimums, retroactive application of reduced sentences, and a clemency review process that includes community and court stakeholders.A second pillar targets wealth-based penalties and private profiteering. It would end cash bail, eliminate court fees and fines for those unable to pay, expand public defender capacity (including immigration law expertise), and bar private entities from profiting from detention or correctional services.
A parallel set of investments would be made in housing, healthcare, jobs, and education—funding social housing at scale, raising the minimum wage, guaranteeing employment, and ensuring universal access to reproductive health services and addiction/mental health care.The plan also rethinks policing and immigration enforcement. It prioritizes resolving serious crimes, curbing militarized policing, ending collaboration between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities, and creating civilian review boards and stronger implicit-bias and de-escalation training.
It would restore the Justice Department’s role in policing reform and establish protections to safeguard civil rights for incarcerated and detained individuals. The overarching goal is to keep families intact, expand civic participation (including voting rights for those imprisoned or awaiting trial), and invest in communities most harmed by current policies.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill calls for large-scale decarceration and community-led reform, including repealing punitive provisions from older policy packages and replacing them with a public health approach.
Confinement is limited: the bill supports capping sentences for nonserious offenses, ending the death penalty, and repealing several mandatory minimums, with retroactive relief and a clemency pathway.
Wealth discrimination reforms target cash bail, court fees, and private profit from detention; public defender capacity is expanded to ensure fair representation.
Major investments are proposed in housing, healthcare, education, and job guarantees, including a trillion-dollar commitment to social housing and a wage floor of $15.
Immigration detention and policing reforms aim to decriminalize migration, reduce detention, end militarized policing, and create pathways to citizenship for migrants.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Decarceration framework and participatory justice reform
This section establishes a participatory process that directly impacted communities will drive, including people’s assemblies and listening sessions to inform legislative reform. It also calls for a community-led platform to repeal the 1994 Crime Bill’s punitive provisions and replace them with a public health–oriented safety agenda, aiming to align policy more closely with lived experience and reduce reliance on incarceration.
Confinement duration and sentencing reforms
The resolution directs dramatic reductions in confinement by (a) decriminalizing select behaviors, expanding diversion and restorative-justice options, and applying reduced sentences retroactively; (b) capping prison terms for non-serious offenses; (c) ending the death penalty and mandatory minimums; (d) creating a clemency review board with community stakeholders to identify candidates for clemency; and (e) retrofitting sentencing rules to incorporate immigrant communities and protect youth from harsh confinement.
Wealth discrimination and pretrial reform
This part targets wealth-based disparities by prohibiting cash bail and pretrial detention based on inability to pay, banning court fees and fines tied to debt, increasing public defender capacity, and prohibiting private profiteering from detention, enforcement, or related services. It also directs investments to ensure fair access to defense and to reduce the financial incentives that drive mass incarceration.
Reentry, health, education, and family stability
A broad set of reforms enhances dignity and stability for those reentering society. Provisions cover comprehensive health care, reproductive rights, social housing expansion, wage guarantees, universal education and vocational training, treatment options for substance use and mental health, and supports for families and survivors of violence. The section emphasizes trauma-informed services, visitation rights, and gender-responsive practices throughout confinement and reentry.
Policing and immigration enforcement reforms
This section seeks to reduce policing militarization and curb immigration enforcement collaboration with local agencies. It prioritizes solving serious crimes, eliminates harmful surveillance and biometric practices, supports civilian review boards, expands nonlaw enforcement crisis response, and tightens oversight to deter civil-rights violations by law enforcement and prosecutors.
Oversight and implementation
An independent division or agency would oversee the Bureau of Prisons and Homeland Security with authority to investigate civil-rights complaints and ensure safe, humane confinement. The section also envisions strengthening agency accountability for consent decrees, litigation governance, and ensuring appropriate regulatory oversight of reform efforts across federal facilities.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Justice across all five countries.
Explore Justice in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- People currently incarcerated or awaiting trial, who would gain from shorter sentences, retroactive relief, and expanded diversion programs.
- Families of incarcerated individuals, who would experience less collateral harm and improved stability through community-centered reforms and better supports.
- Directly affected communities, particularly Black and Brown communities, which bear the most harm from punitive policies and would benefit from decarceration and expanded social investments.
- Public defenders and civil-rights advocates, who would see expanded resources and stronger protections against wrongful detention and indigent defense limitations.
- Immigrant communities and families, who would benefit from decriminalization measures, reduced detention, and a pathway to citizenship.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal and state governments funding major housing, health, education, and social-service investments; tax expenditures and budgetary reforms will be needed to finance reforms.
- Local governments and courts implementing alternate pretrial systems and reforms to bail, fines, and fees; these may require upfront investments and capacity-building.
- Private detention, jail, and prison service providers that currently profit from confinement and related operations; their role would be restricted or eliminated.
- Law enforcement agencies and prosecutors adapting to civilian oversight, new response models, and retraining requirements; there may be transitional costs and political pushback.
- Taxpayers bearing cost of new programs and potential reallocation of existing funds to support housing, healthcare, and education commitments.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is how to achieve transformative justice—reducing confinement, dismantling punitive policies, and expanding social supports—while maintaining public safety, budget discipline, and political feasibility across diverse jurisdictions.
The bill envisions sweeping decarceration and systemic reform, but implementing such a paradigm shift will hinge on how federal funding aligns with state and local capacities, and how quickly jurisdictions can adapt to new pretrial and sentencing norms. The plan also contends with trade-offs between rapid safety gains and the administrative burden of broader reforms, including oversight, data collection, and ensuring that reforms do not inadvertently undermine public safety or economic stability in the short term.
Financing, coordination across jurisdictions, and protections for vulnerable populations will require careful, ongoing assessment as reforms roll out.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.