This House resolution asks Congress to mark a single week in October 2025 as "Coal Week" and to express congressional support for the coal industry. It is a symbolic measure that praises coal workers and frames coal as a continuing contributor to electricity supply and national security.
The text also emphasizes recent reductions in emissions from coal-fired plants and ties those reductions to public-health and economic benefits. For practitioners, the resolution is a messaging instrument rather than a legislative vehicle that changes law or funding streams, but it signals priorities for certain members and constituencies.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill is a House resolution that expresses the chamber’s support for designating the week beginning October 19, 2025, as "Coal Week" and recognizes progress in reducing emissions from coal-fired power. It contains only findings (whereas clauses) and two short resolved clauses.
Who It Affects
Direct legal impact is nil — it does not create rights, duties, or appropriations — but the statement targets the coal industry, coal-producing states, utilities that operate coal plants, and members of Congress who advocate for fossil-fuel industries. It also speaks to military and national-security audiences invoked in the text.
Why It Matters
Though symbolic, the resolution packages arguments — reliability and affordability, military readiness, and claims of emissions reductions — that stakeholders will use in debates over energy and climate policy. It signals how some lawmakers want coal discussed in the public record and may influence messaging by state officials and industry groups.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
H. Res. 823 is a short, nonbinding resolution introduced in the House that asks the chamber to recognize a week in October 2025 as "Coal Week." The operative language consists of two resolved clauses: one that supports the designation and another that congratulates ongoing reductions in coal emissions while recognizing coal's role in energy and military support.
Because it is a House resolution (not a statute), it makes a formal statement of the House’s view rather than changing legal or regulatory obligations.
The preamble assembles a sequence of factual and normative claims: it commends coal workers; cites coal’s historical role in the industrial revolution and in naval modernization; asserts coal’s contemporary importance for reliable baseload power; and points to emissions reductions at coal plants as contributing to air quality and economic stability. The text includes specific numeric references: it states coal supplied 19.5 percent of utility-scale electricity in the United States in 2022 and that coal provides more than 36 percent of global electricity as of the resolution’s introduction.Practically, the resolution places those claims on the Congressional Record, which gives advocates a congressional citation they can use in public and policy debates.
It was introduced by Representative Mike Kennedy (Utah), lists several cosponsors from coal-producing states, and was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. There is no implementing authority, funding, or compliance regime in the text; its effect is reputational and rhetorical.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The resolution designates the week beginning October 19, 2025, as "Coal Week" and asks the House to support that designation.
The preamble claims coal provided 19.5% of U.S. utility-scale electricity in 2022 and asserts coal supplies more than 36% of global electricity as of the bill’s introduction.
The text explicitly links coal to military readiness, citing coal’s historical role in powering naval modernization and its present relevance to national security.
The resolution praises ongoing reductions in emissions from coal-fired plants and ties those reductions to air quality, public health, and economic stability.
Introduced by Rep. Mike Kennedy (UT) and referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, the measure is a nonbinding House resolution with no appropriation or regulatory effect.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Findings framing coal’s historical and contemporary importance
This section compiles the resolution’s factual claims and framings: it commends coal-sector workers, recounts coal’s role in the industrial revolution and naval steam power, and emphasizes coal’s present-day role in providing baseload electricity and supporting military readiness. The practical import is rhetorical: these findings are not judicially enforceable but serve as the factual predicate for the Resolved clauses and as a record lawmakers and stakeholders can cite.
Support for designating 'Coal Week'
The first resolved clause states the House ‘supports the designation’ of the specified week as "Coal Week." That language constitutes a formal expression of support but imposes no legal obligations, spending, or regulatory changes. Its immediate effect is symbolic recognition and a Congressional Record entry.
Acknowledgement of emissions reductions and coal’s role
The second resolved clause congratulates ongoing reductions in coal emissions each year and recognizes coal’s importance for military readiness and economic stability. This clause reiterates the resolution’s policy framing — that emissions reductions and energy reliability can be balanced — and provides a succinct policy argument that industry and allied policymakers can invoke in public comments and advocacy.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Energy across all five countries.
Explore Energy in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Coal industry workers and unions — the resolution publicly commends their labor and elevates their contribution in the Congressional Record, which can be used in local advocacy and political messaging.
- Coal producers and state economies in major coal-producing states — the designation and the cited statistics provide a federal-level endorsement useful for state economic development, tourism, and lobbying efforts.
- Coal industry trade associations and utilities operating coal plants — they gain a formal, quotable congressional statement asserting coal’s continuing role and alleged emissions progress, useful for communications with regulators and customers.
- Members of Congress and political actors who support fossil-fuel industries — sponsors and cosponsors obtain a Congressional Record entry aligning them with pro-coal messaging that may be valuable to constituents and donors.
Who Bears the Cost
- Environmental and climate advocacy groups — while the resolution imposes no legal costs, it creates a recorded counter-narrative that these groups will need to rebut in public forums and policy debates.
- Policymakers seeking to accelerate decarbonization — the resolution’s framing (reliability, security, and emissions reductions) may complicate advocacy for policies that phase out coal by providing opponents with an authoritative-sounding citation.
- Federal agencies and regulators — although the measure creates no compliance duties, agencies may face increased politicized messaging and stakeholder pressure tied to the resolution’s claims.
- Local governments and communities pursuing clean-energy transitions — the Congressional endorsement of coal could be cited in litigation or public campaigns that slow local transition policies, imposing political and planning frictions.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is symbolic: the resolution seeks to honor coal’s workforce and assert coal’s ongoing role in reliability and security, while also claiming emissions progress — but celebrating coal at the federal level runs up against competing policy objectives to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions and transition electricity systems. In short, it recognizes both economic and security benefits of coal while leaving unresolved whether continued reliance is compatible with aggressive decarbonization goals.
The primary implementation characteristic of this resolution is its rhetorical force: it records a set of assertions on the Congressional Record but contains no enforcement mechanisms, budgetary provisions, or regulatory mandates. That limits direct operational impact but raises questions about indirect effects — whether an official expression of support for coal will be used to contest regulatory actions, oppose clean-energy funding, or influence Department of Defense planning documents that consider energy resilience.
Substantively, the resolution blends several claims that deserve scrutiny. It cites specific shares of electricity generation for coal at national and global levels and celebrates emissions reductions at coal plants, but it does not define the metrics, baselines, or technologies underlying those reductions.
The text’s juxtaposition of coal’s asserted reliability and claimed emissions improvements creates a narrative that coal can continue as a bridge or core fuel while meeting environmental goals — a position that intersects uneasily with decarbonization pathways that rely on rapid coal retirement. The resolution therefore clarifies political alignments without resolving empirical debates about lifecycle emissions, future grid planning, or the cost of maintaining coal capacity versus accelerating alternatives.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.