Codify — Article

Crucial Communism Teaching Act creates civics curriculum

Federal civics curriculum and oral history project to teach about communism and totalitarian ideologies in high schools.

The Brief

The Crucial Communism Teaching Act would require the federal government to support a civics education initiative focused on communism and related totalitarian ideologies. The independent entity established under the FRIENDSHIP Act — the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation — would develop a civic education curriculum for high school students and create oral history resources to accompany it.

The program is designed to be used alongside existing social studies, government, history, and economics courses and to engage with state and local educational leaders for implementation.

The curriculum would include a comparative discussion of the ideologies in question and their impact, aiming to promote understanding of freedom and democracy while providing historical context. The oral history resources, titled Portraits in Patriotism, would feature diverse individuals who experienced these ideologies and who can compare them with the U.S. political system.

The bill contemplates active collaboration with state and local educational leaders to facilitate use of the materials in high schools across jurisdictions.

At a Glance

What It Does

The independent entity created under section 905(b)(1)(B) of the FRIENDSHIP Act shall develop a civic education curriculum for high school students that includes a comparative discussion of communism and totalitarianism, ensures accuracy and accessibility, and aligns with multiple courses. It shall also create oral history resources—portraits in patriotism—from diverse individuals who faced these ideologies and can compare them to the United States.

Who It Affects

Directly affects high school students, their schools, and the educators who implement civics, social studies, history, and economics curricula. State and local educational agencies will coordinate adoption and training, and the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation acts as the implementing body.

Why It Matters

This act formalizes federal support for civics content about certain ideologies and adds primary-source oral histories to classroom resources. It signals a shift in curriculum development and can affect how civics concepts are taught, assessed, and integrated across standards.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill tasks a federally chartered foundation with creating a civics curriculum for high schools that examines communism and related ideologies in a way that contrasts them with the United States’ democratic principles. It also requires the development of oral history resources called Portraits in Patriotism, drawing from diverse individuals who experienced those ideologies to provide personal perspectives on civic life and civic duty.

The program is designed to be used in conjunction with existing social studies, government, history, and economics courses and to be implemented with the cooperation of state and local education authorities.

Implementation hinges on collaboration with state and local education leaders to help schools adopt and integrate the new curriculum and resources. The definitions used in the act tie its terms to existing provisions in the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, ensuring alignment with broader education policy.

The bill frames the initiative as an educational program rather than a political mandate, emphasizing historical context and civic understanding rather than advocacy.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The bill requires the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation to develop a civics curriculum for high school students.

2

The curriculum must include a comparative discussion of communism and totalitarian ideologies and align with multiple core social studies and economics courses.

3

Oral histories titled Portraits in Patriotism will accompany the curriculum and feature diverse individuals who experienced these ideologies.

4

The Foundation is tasked with engaging state and local educational leaders to assist high schools in using the materials.

5

The act references definitions from the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to frame its applicability and scope.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 1

Short Title

This section designates the act’s formal short title as the Crucial Communism Teaching Act. It is a housekeeping provision that signals the legislative framing and makes subsequent references consistent across jurisdictions.

Section 2

Purposes

Section 2 states the act’s aims: to help schools prepare students to be civically responsible and knowledgeable; to ensure students learn about the harms attributed to communism and related ideologies; and to establish a foundation for ongoing civic education informed by historical context. The language ties the goals to fostering understanding of freedom and democracy within high school curricula.

Section 3

Development and Dissemination of Curriculum and Oral History Resources

Section 3 assigns the implementing responsibility to the independent entity created under section 905(b)(1)(B) of the FRIENDSHIP Act (the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation). It directs the foundation to develop a civic education curriculum and to create oral history resources, including personal stories titled Portraits in Patriotism, from diverse individuals who experienced the described ideologies and can compare them with the United States. The section also requires engagement with state and local educational leaders to aid high schools in using the materials.

1 more section
Section 4

Definitions

Section 4 cross-references the definitions applied by Section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 and states that those terms apply to this Act, situating the bill within existing education policy and ensuring consistency with established statutory language.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Education across all five countries.

Explore Education in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • High school students gain access to a structured, historically informed civics education that incorporates comparative ideological analysis.
  • Teachers and school districts receive ready-to-use materials and oral histories to enrich instruction and student engagement.
  • State and local educational agencies coordinate adoption and training, promoting standardized implementation.
  • The Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation acts as the implementing body, advancing its mission through formally authorized curriculum development.
  • Educator associations and education policy actors may gain a framework for discussions about civics and history.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Federal funding to the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation for development and dissemination of materials.
  • State and local educational agencies bear costs associated with adopting the curriculum, teacher professional development, and alignment with existing standards.
  • School districts may incur costs for integrating new materials into existing course sequences and assessments.
  • Publishers and educational content providers may incur costs to adapt materials to align with the curriculum.
  • The implementing foundation and its partner organizations may incur ongoing administrative costs to sustain dissemination efforts.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

Balancing the objective of teaching about the dangers and impacts of communism and totalitarian ideologies with concerns about neutrality in the classroom and the risk of politicizing civics education.

The act raises policy tensions about how to present ideologies with historical harms in a neutral, academically rigorous manner while clearly conveying the harms associated with such ideologies. Implementing the curriculum across diverse states raises questions about alignment with state standards, teacher training needs, and the ongoing updating of materials to reflect new scholarship.

Additionally, funding arrangements and the role of an advocacy-oriented foundation in curriculum development may prompt scrutiny about independence, accuracy, and balance in classroom materials.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.