Codify — Article

Mining Schools Act of 2025: DOE grants to strengthen domestic mining education

Creates a DOE technology-grants program to recruit and train the next generation of mining engineers and bolster the U.S. critical mineral capability.

The Brief

The bill would require the Secretary of Energy, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior (acting through the USGS), to establish a competitive grant program to strengthen domestic mining education and to award up to 10 grants per year to mining schools for recruiting and expanding mining-related programs. It defines key terms (mining school, mining profession, mining industry) and sets out eligible program activities that grants may fund, including technology, reclamation, and processing improvements.

The act also creates a Mining Professional Development Advisory Board to advise on grant selection and oversight, requires publication of board recommendations and the Secretary’s responses, repeals the Mining and Mineral Resources Institutes Act, and authorizes $10 million annually for 2026–2033.

At a Glance

What It Does

Establishes a competitive grant program within the DOE to strengthen domestic mining education and awards up to 10 grants annually to mining schools. Grants fund recruitment and program enhancements across mining technology, reclamation, refining, and related areas.

Who It Affects

Mining schools (including ABET-accredited programs at higher education institutions and certain public institutions), their students, and the DOE/Interior coordination with USGS. The program targets regionally diverse grant recipients to develop area-specific mining capabilities.

Why It Matters

Strengthens the domestic pipeline of mining professionals and supports critical mineral supply chains by expanding education and training, potentially reducing reliance on foreign sources and enabling regional specialization.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The act creates a dedicated program within the Department of Energy to fund mining education at eligible colleges and universities. It defines who counts as a mining school and what kind of activities the grants can support, then lays out a plan to award up to 10 grants each year.

A six-member Mining Professional Development Advisory Board will review applications and make funding recommendations, with the Secretary expected to consider those recommendations as part of the selection process. The bill also requires transparency around Board recommendations by requiring publication of the Secretary’s justification when a recommendation is rejected and the publication of the Board’s recommendation status within 15 days of grant award.

Finally, the act repeals a prior statute governing Mining and Mineral Resources Institutes and authorizes $10 million per year in funding from 2026 through 2033 for the program.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The bill authorizes a DOE grant program with a hard cap of 10 grants per year to mining schools.

2

Grants may be used to recruit students and to strengthen mining-related programs, including technology, reclamation, refining, and critical minerals work.

3

A six-member Mining Professional Development Advisory Board will evaluate applications and advise the Secretary on funding.

4

The Secretary must publish a concise rationale for any Board recommendation that is not accepted, within 15 days after a grant is awarded.

5

The act repeals the Mining and Mineral Resources Institutes Act and authorizes $10 million annually from 2026–2033 for the program.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 1

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Technology Grants to Strengthen Domestic Mining Education Act of 2025, also known as the Mining Schools Act of 2025. The title signals the core policy aim: to accelerate domestic mining education through targeted technology grants and related activities.

Section 2(a)

Definitions

Key terms are defined to set the scope of the program. A ‘Board’ refers to the Mining Professional Development Advisory Board. ‘Institution of higher education’ aligns with the Higher Education Act. The ‘Mining industry’ covers exploration, extraction, processing, and recycling. The ‘Mining profession’ includes activities from site planning and remediation to refining and recycling. A ‘Mining school’ encompasses ABET-accredited programs or relevant departments at 4-year public institutions in qualifying states.

Section 2(b)

Domestic Mining Education Strengthening Program

The Secretary, in coordination with the Interior Department and USGS, must establish a grant program to strengthen domestic mining education. The program aims to recruit students and educate the next generation of mining engineers and professionals to meet U.S. mineral and energy needs.

4 more sections
Section 2(c)

Grants

The Secretary may award up to 10 grants per fiscal year to mining schools. Awards should strive for geographic diversity to build region-specific expertise in mining. Grants must be awarded no later than 180 days after the start of the fiscal year or after enacted appropriations, whichever is later.

Section 2(d)

Mining Professional Development Advisory Board

The Board consists of six members—three active in the mining industry and three from academia with experience running professional-skills training programs. The Board evaluates applications, recommends grant recipients and amounts, and monitors the use of funds to ensure alignment with program purposes.

Section 2(e)

Authorization of Appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated $10,000,000 for each fiscal year from 2026 through 2033 to carry out the program.

Section 3

Repeal of the Mining and Mineral Resources Institutes Act

The act repeals the Mining and Mineral Resources Institutes Act (30 U.S.C. 1221 et seq.), removing that statutory framework and replacing it with the new program under this Act.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Education across all five countries.

Explore Education in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Mining schools (including ABET-accredited programs and eligible tribal colleges) gain funding to recruit students and expand curricula in mining-related fields.
  • Students pursuing mining engineering, geology, metallurgy, and related disciplines benefit from enhanced programs and clearer pathways into the mining industry.
  • The U.S. mining industry and broader energy/mineral sectors gain a larger, better-trained workforce to support domestic mineral production and technology development.
  • Regions with significant mining activity gain regionally tailored programs, promoting geographic diversification of expertise.
  • Federal agencies (DOE and Interior/USGS) gain a formal mechanism for coordinating workforce development in mining and critical minerals.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Federal funding: $10 million per year from 2026 through 2033 for the program.
  • Administrative and oversight costs to DOE for program management and board operations.
  • Potential transitional costs for institutions shifting from the prior Institutes Act framework to the new grant-based program.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

Should the federal approach to mining education rely on a structured, competitive-grant program with independent advisory oversight and geographic distribution, or would a broader, more integrated funding and governance model have ensured more stable, nationwide capacity-building without potential delays in grant awards?

The bill creates a comprehensive grant program with built-in oversight and transparency requirements through the Advisory Board. It relies on annual appropriations, which means implementation depends on annual funding.

A central tension is balancing geographic diversity and programmatic focus with timely grant awards; the Board’s recommendations are intended to guide funding, but the Secretary retains final authority, with a requirement to publish the rationale for decisions that depart from the Board. The repeal of the Mining and Mineral Resources Institutes Act removes an older statutory vessel for mining education and replaces it with this targeted grant approach, raising questions about long-term institutional capacity and program continuity beyond the 2026–2033 window.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.