Codify — Article

Working Families Flexibility Act of 2025 creates private‑sector compensatory time under FLSA

Authorizes private employers to offer comp time in lieu of overtime with written consent or a collective‑bargained agreement, new payout rules, enforcement penalties, and a five‑year sunset.

The Brief

The bill amends the Fair Labor Standards Act to let private‑sector employers offer compensatory time off (comp time) instead of monetary overtime pay, provided employees affirmatively choose comp time under a collective bargaining agreement or a pre‑work written agreement. It imposes employer obligations on accrual, payout, recordkeeping, and anti‑coercion protections, and makes certain violations subject to statutory damages.

The measure includes DOL notice updates, a GAO reporting requirement to track usage and enforcement, and a five‑year sunset. For employers, payroll vendors, unions, and compliance teams, the bill creates a new elective mechanism that raises immediate operational and enforcement questions while temporarily altering how overtime obligations are met.

At a Glance

What It Does

The bill permits private employers to give employees compensatory time off in lieu of monetary overtime pay when the employee knowingly and voluntarily elects comp time under a collective bargaining agreement or a pre‑work written agreement. It sets rules on accrual caps, payout timing, and prohibits employer coercion around comp‑time selection or use.

Who It Affects

The rule targets private employers and their hourly, nonpublic‑sector employees — particularly employers negotiating CBAs, human resources and payroll departments, and employees who work substantial hours and want time‑off flexibility. Labor organizations and compliance vendors will also be directly affected.

Why It Matters

This would be the first time compensatory time is authorized for most private‑sector workers at the federal level, shifting some overtime obligations from immediate cash to potentially deferred time off and creating new compliance, cashflow, and enforcement considerations for employers and regulators.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill adds a new subsection to FLSA section 7 creating a private‑sector compensatory time option. Employers may give comp time at a rate of one and one‑half hours of comp time for each overtime hour worked, but only when the arrangement is either part of a collective bargaining agreement or is a written, verifiable agreement made before the work is performed.

The agreement must be voluntary; the bill explicitly bars making comp time a condition of hiring.

Not every employee can use this option: the statute conditions eligibility on a prior period of continuous employment (the bill sets a minimum hours threshold), and it caps how much comp time an employee may accumulate. Employers must convert unused comp time to cash on a regular schedule and also pay out unused balances at separation.

The conversion rate for payouts is the higher of the employee’s regular rate when the comp time was earned or the employee’s final regular rate.The bill creates employee protections against employer coercion and improper interference — including a private remedy tied to unpaid overtime principles and an additional liquidated‑damages component for violations of the anti‑coercion rule. It directs the Department of Labor to update the standard FLSA notice to reflect the new option and tasks the Government Accountability Office with multi‑year reporting on how often comp time is used and how it is enforced.

Finally, the entire amendment sunsets after five years, so the program is explicitly temporary.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The bill authorizes private‑sector comp time at a rate of 1.5 hours of compensatory time for each overtime hour worked, to be provided in lieu of monetary overtime.

2

Employees may only receive comp time through a collective bargaining agreement or a voluntary, written, verifiable agreement made before the work is performed, and only after meeting the bill’s prior‑service eligibility threshold.

3

An employee may accrue no more than 160 hours of compensatory time; employers must pay unused comp time by a set annual deadline (or within 31 days of an alternative 12‑month period) and must pay out accrued time at separation.

4

Employees can withdraw an individual comp‑time agreement or request monetary payment at any time; employers must pay requested amounts within 30 days and may force payment of unused balances over specified thresholds after 30 days’ notice.

5

The bill creates a statutory enforcement path: violations of the anti‑coercion rules are treated as unpaid overtime with an added liquidated‑damages remedy, the DOL must update employee notices, GAO will report annually for three years after a two‑year delay, and the entire scheme sunsets after five years.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 2 — new 7(r)(1)–(2)

Creates private‑sector compensatory time and the consent requirement

This provision establishes the core permission: employers may offer compensatory time off at one‑and‑a‑half hours per overtime hour instead of cash. Crucially, the bill ties that permission to employee choice — comp time must be offered either through a collective bargaining agreement or through a written, verifiable individual agreement made before the work is performed and affirmed voluntarily. Practically, employers will need documented consent processes and clear agreements to satisfy the ‘before performance’ and ‘voluntary’ requirements to avoid claims that the election was coerced.

Section 2 — new 7(r)(2) eligibility rule

Minimum service requirement for individual agreements

The statute disqualifies employees who have not worked a minimum amount of time for the employer in the prior 12‑month continuous employment period before agreeing to receive comp time. That creates a bright‑line eligibility gate for individual (non‑union) elections and means employers must track cumulative hours and continuous employment status to determine who can lawfully elect comp time.

Section 2 — new 7(r)(3)

Accrual caps, annual payout timing, and employer options

The bill caps comp‑time accrual at a fixed number of comp‑time hours and requires employers to convert and pay unused balances by a rigid annual deadline (with the ability to choose an alternative 12‑month period). It also allows employers to force monetary payment of larger unused balances after advance notice and to terminate a voluntary comp‑time policy with notice, unless a collective bargaining agreement says otherwise. From a payroll perspective, this creates recurring year‑end calculations and potential cash‑flow spikes employers must plan for.

4 more sections
Section 2 — new 7(r)(4)–(7)

Anti‑coercion, use, and separation payout rules

The bill forbids direct or indirect intimidation or coercion by employers intended to influence an employee’s choice about comp time or to force use of accrued time. It requires employers to permit reasonable use of accrued comp time upon employee request unless the use would unduly disrupt operations, and mandates cash payment of accrued unused comp time at separation. Operationally, employers will need written policies, procedures for approving time‑off requests, and training to avoid conduct that could be characterized as coercive.

Section 2 — new 7(r)(6) & (8)

Payout rate and definitional cross‑references

When employers pay for unused comp time, they must use the higher of the regular rate when the time was earned or the final regular rate — a protection that can increase employer liability if rates rise. The new subsection also cross‑references existing FLSA definitions for terms like ‘compensatory time’ and excludes public‑agency employees from this private‑sector authorization, keeping the longstanding public‑sector framework intact.

Section 3 — Remedies (amendment to section 16)

Enforcement: unpaid overtime treatment plus liquidated damages for coercion

The bill makes violations of the anti‑coercion clause actionable under FLSA section 16 and specifies that an employer that violates the anti‑coercion rule is liable for the compensation rate for each hour of accrued comp time plus an additional liquidated‑damages amount, reduced by payments for hours the employee actually used. That phrasing layers a damages exposure on top of unpaid‑overtime recovery and creates a particular exposure for employers whose policies or communications are found coercive.

Section 4–6 — Notice, GAO reporting, and sunset

Regulatory updates, mandated reporting, and temporary authorization

The Secretary of Labor must revise the standard FLSA employee notice to reflect the new private‑sector comp‑time option shortly after enactment. The Comptroller General must produce a data‑driven report beginning two years after enactment and annually for the following three years, tracking usage and enforcement metrics. The statute includes an explicit five‑year sunset, meaning the entire private‑sector comp‑time authority expires unless reenacted.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Employment across all five countries.

Explore Employment in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Employees seeking schedule flexibility — Workers who prefer time off instead of cash can convert overtime into paid time away, which helps caregivers and workers needing blocks of leave without spending paid time‑off banks.
  • Unionized employees and bargaining units — Labor organizations can negotiate comp‑time terms into CBAs as a bargaining tool and preserve stronger protections than the statute provides for individual agreements.
  • Employers aiming to manage staffing and retention — Employers can offer comp time as a non‑monetary benefit to attract or retain employees, shift compensation timing, and use time‑off as an operational lever instead of immediate cash outlays.
  • Payroll and HR technology vendors — New recordkeeping, accrual tracking, payout scheduling, and notice features can be productized and sold to employers adjusting to the new regime.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Private employers — They must build consent workflows, track eligibility and accruals, budget for periodic cash‑outs, and defend against new litigation exposures tied to coercion and payout calculations.
  • Small businesses and low‑margin employers — Administrative overhead and potential year‑end cash demands hit smaller employers harder, particularly those without sophisticated payroll systems.
  • Department of Labor and enforcement apparatus — DOL will face new monitoring, complaint handling, and investigatory burdens; the GAO reporting requirement also creates additional administrative follow‑up.
  • Part‑time and precarious workers — Employees who do not meet the prior‑service hours threshold cannot opt in and therefore miss the flexibility benefit, potentially widening disparities between higher‑hour and lower‑hour workers.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The bill’s central tension is flexibility versus wage protection: it offers employees and employers a new, voluntary tool to convert overtime into time off, but by making comp time elective and time‑based rather than cash‑based it increases reliance on employers’ compliant administration and on enforcement after the fact — a trade‑off between upfront wage certainty and later scheduling flexibility that invites disputes, enforcement costs, and potential unequal access.

The bill trades immediate cash protections for conditional flexibility. Allowing comp time in the private sector gives employers and some employees choice, but it shifts risk onto workers if employers inadequately document consent or subtly pressure employees.

Proving coercion is fact‑intensive: the statute bans direct or indirect coercion, but workplace communications that influence employees may sit in a gray area that invites litigation and administratively costly investigations.

Implementation burdens are real: employers must maintain verifiable pre‑work agreements, calculate accruals under a 1.5:1 conversion, monitor eligibility windows, manage annual payout mechanics, and handle separation payouts. The payout timing rules can create cash‑flow volatility, especially for employers who do not regularly budget for large lump‑sum payments.

The five‑year sunset adds uncertainty: businesses may hesitate to invest in systems or negotiated benefits that could disappear, while enforcement agencies must plan for a temporary regime and the GAO study period that starts two years after enactment, potentially leaving early years under‑reported.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.