The HERO for Youth Act amends Internal Revenue Code §51 to widen eligibility for the Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC). It lets employers claim the credit for students employed up to 20 hours per week during the school year and adds a new ‘disconnected youth’ category — including certain out‑of‑school young people and some former foster youth — subject to local‑agency certification and a brief self‑certification by the worker.
For employers, workforce agencies, and tax practitioners, the bill changes who qualifies, how hires must be documented, and how local workforce agencies participate in certification. It also removes and renumbers an existing subparagraph in §51(d)(7) that affects the credit calculation, so practitioners must reconcile the amendment with the current statutory credit percentages and wage caps.
The provisions apply to workers who begin employment after enactment.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill modifies IRC §51 to (1) let students employed no more than 20 hours per week between Sept. 16 and Apr. 30 while regularly attending secondary school qualify for the WOTC, and (2) add a new 'disconnected youth' category that requires certification by a designated local agency and limited self‑certification by the hire. It also strikes and renumbers a subparagraph in the existing youth credit rules and removes the word 'summer' from several cross‑references.
Who It Affects
Employers that hire teenagers and young adults (retailers, hospitality, nonprofits, municipalities), state and local workforce agencies that certify eligibility, payroll/tax advisors who screen hires for WOTC claims, and the young people who will be newly eligible, including certain former foster youth.
Why It Matters
The bill shifts the WOTC from a mostly summer‑hire incentive to one that covers part‑time, in‑school hires and targeted out‑of‑school youth — potentially increasing credit take‑up and changing how employers document eligibility. The statutory edits to §51(d)(7) also require tax teams to verify how the credit percentage and wage limits apply once the amendment is read against existing code.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The HERO for Youth Act rewrites parts of the Work Opportunity Tax Credit’s youth provisions so employers can claim the credit for a broader set of hires. First, it alters the definition that previously targeted 'summer youth' to cover students who work limited hours during the school year: if a secondary‑school student is employed no more than 20 hours per week during any period from September 16 to April 30, that hire becomes eligible under the young‑worker rules.
That change is designed to make part‑time, school‑year work count for the credit instead of restricting benefits to summer employment only.
Second, the bill inserts a new eligibility bucket called 'disconnected youth.' That label covers two groups: (A) individuals aged 16–24 who are certified by a designated local agency and who self‑certify (on a form the Treasury prescribes) that in the prior six months they were not regularly attending school, were not regularly employed, and are not readily employable because they lack basic skills; and (B) individuals aged 16–20 who the designated local agency certifies as eligible foster children who were in foster care during the previous 12 months. Both paths to eligibility require the local agency’s certification as the statutory trigger for an employer’s WOTC claim.The bill also makes drafting changes to §51(d)(7) by striking an existing subparagraph (B) and renumbering the following subparagraph, and it removes the term 'summer' from various cross‑references.
The text does not itself spell out new percentage rates or wage caps; rather, it alters which hires meet the youth categories and leaves practitioners to map those changes onto the existing credit calculation. Finally, the amendments take effect for individuals who begin work after the date of enactment, so employers must update screening and certification procedures for new hires going forward.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill amends IRC §51(d)(7) to permit a secondary‑school student employed no more than 20 hours per week between Sept. 16 and Apr. 30 to qualify under the youth WOTC category.
It adds a new 'disconnected youth' eligibility category that requires certification by a designated local agency plus a worker self‑certification on a Treasury‑prescribed form.
The 'disconnected youth' definition has two prongs: (A) ages 16–24 who were out of school and out of regular employment for the prior six months and lack basic skills (self‑certified), or (B) ages 16–20 who are eligible foster children in care during the prior 12 months (agency‑certified).
The bill strikes subparagraph (B) of §51(d)(7) and redesignates the next subparagraph as (B), a drafting change that will require tax teams to reconcile how the existing credit percentage and wage limits apply to these newly eligible hires.
The amendments apply only to individuals who begin work for the employer after the Act’s enactment date, so employers must revise WOTC screening for new hires rather than retroactively for existing employees.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Convert the youth credit from 'summer' to limited‑hour, school‑year eligibility
This provision removes the strict 'summer' limitation and inserts a clause that explicitly covers students who will be employed no more than 20 hours per week during any period between September 16 and April 30 while regularly attending secondary school. For employers, the immediate practical effect is that part‑time, in‑school hires during the academic year can now trigger the WOTC; HR must therefore document hours and verify the worker’s regular school attendance for the relevant period.
Strike and renumber a subparagraph affecting the credit amount
The bill deletes the current subparagraph (B) of §51(d)(7) and redesignates the next subparagraph as (B). The statutory text does not itself insert a new percentage or wage base; instead, this change alters the internal structure of the youth credit provision. Tax advisers and corporate tax departments will need to compare the amended structure to preexisting §51(d)(7)(B) to determine whether the applicable credit percentage, wage caps, or phase‑in rules have changed in effect.
Conforming amendments removing 'summer' from cross‑references
Several cross‑references and a subsection heading that previously used the term 'summer' are changed to neutral language. That reduces drafting friction across §51 so the statute reads consistently for year‑round, limited‑hour student hires. Practically, this will require tax forms, IRS guidance, and state workforce agency materials that previously referenced 'summer youth' to be updated to the broader terminology.
Add 'disconnected youth' as a WOTC‑eligible target
This amendment inserts 'disconnected youth' into the list of qualifying groups under §51(d)(1), creating a new pathway for employers to claim WOTC when they hire an eligible disconnected youth. The employer’s claim will depend on certification from a designated local agency that confirms the youth meets the statutory criteria; the provision therefore formalizes a local‑agency gatekeeping role already used in other WOTC categories.
Define 'disconnected youth' and set the effective date
The bill defines disconnected youth with two distinct prongs: a self‑certifying out‑of‑school/out‑of‑work group aged 16–24 and a foster‑care prong for ages 16–20 tied to the foster‑care definition in §152(f)(1)(C). The text requires the use of a Treasury‑prescribed self‑certification form for the first prong and agency certification for both prongs. The effective date clause states these amendments apply to individuals who begin work after enactment, so only hires made after that date are eligible under the new language.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Employers that hire part‑time students (retail, hospitality, education nonprofits): They can claim WOTC for in‑school, limited‑hour hires during the academic year, expanding the pool of subsidized youth labor.
- Disconnected youth aged 16–24 who have been out of school and out of regular employment: The bill creates a direct pathway to subsidized jobs via employer tax credits, potentially improving hiring incentives for hard‑to‑place young people.
- Former foster youth ages 16–20 who meet the foster‑care prong: They gain an explicit route to employer incentives tied to recent foster‑care experience, which can increase targeted hiring by employers seeking WOTC claims.
- Workforce and youth service providers that place young workers: They may see higher placement demand as employers pursue credits, giving providers more leverage in connecting disconnected youth with employers.
Who Bears the Cost
- Employers (HR and payroll teams): They must update WOTC screening, track part‑time hours across the school year, collect new documentation, and manage certification paperwork, increasing administrative overhead.
- Designated local workforce agencies: Agencies must certify disconnected youth and process new self‑certification forms, creating additional workload without accompanying federal staffing or funding in the bill.
- Tax advisors and compliance shops: They must reconcile the statute’s restructured §51(d)(7) with existing credit rules and may face more client inquiries and audit risk adjustments.
- Federal and state tax agencies: The IRS and state workforce agencies will need to revise forms, guidance, and audit procedures to reflect the broader eligibility and address potential improper claims, which may require new rulemaking and outreach resources.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill’s central dilemma is between widening employer incentives to put more young people — especially hard‑to‑place and former foster youth — into jobs, and the increased risk of improper or unverifiable WOTC claims plus the administrative burden that comes with broader eligibility. Expanding access helps meet workforce and social‑mobility goals but shifts verification and audit costs onto employers and underfunded local agencies, creating a trade‑off between reach and program integrity.
Several practical and doctrinal ambiguities will determine how consequential the bill is. Most immediately, striking and renumbering a subparagraph of §51(d)(7) changes statutory structure but does not itself state new credit percentages or wage limits; practitioners must map the amendment onto the preexisting credit calculation to know whether the credit rate for these hires rises, falls, or stays the same.
That reconciliation is a technical exercise that will require careful cross‑referencing of the amended provisions against the current code and likely IRS guidance.
The bill relies on a mix of agency certification and worker self‑certification. The self‑certification pathway (for the out‑of‑school/out‑of‑work prong) raises program‑integrity questions: 'not readily employable by reason of lacking a sufficient number of basic skills' is inherently subjective and the statute does not identify objective measures or training records that verify the claim.
That creates enforcement and audit challenges and places the burden on local agencies and employers to substantiate eligibility. Similarly, the expansion of documentation requirements—school attendance verification, weekly hour limits, foster‑care history—will require updated forms and new internal controls at employers and at certifying agencies, and the bill contains no appropriation to support the extra administrative work.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.