The Expanding Partnerships for Innovation and Competitiveness Act would direct the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology to establish a nonprofit Foundation for Standards and Metrology. The Foundation would operate alongside the Institute to advance measurement science, standards, and technology, and to accelerate collaboration with researchers, industry, and other partners.
It would be funded through federal appropriations and private gifts, governed by a Board of Directors, and subject to audits and reporting requirements to ensure transparency and accountability. The bill emphasizes safeguarding integrity, avoiding government misappropriation, and ensuring complementarity with NIST programs.
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates a nonprofit Foundation for Standards and Metrology to advance metrology, technical standards, and commercialization by coordinating research, facilities, and stakeholder engagement. It may receive funds, enter into contracts, and support various activities aligned with NIST’s mission.
Who It Affects
NIST, universities, federally funded research centers, private sector entities involved in standards development, and state/local government partners that interact with NIST and the Foundation.
Why It Matters
It formalizes private-sector and academic collaboration to speed standards adoption and technology transfer, potentially expanding U.S. leadership in measurement science and standards-enabled innovation.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill would authorize the creation of the Foundation for Standards and Metrology as a nonprofit corporation under the Secretary, acting through the NIST Director. The Foundation’s mission is to support NIST’s work in measurement science, standards, and technology, while promoting collaboration among academia, industry, nonprofits, and government to accelerate the development of standards and the commercialization of federally funded research.
It would engage internationally on metrology and standards, fund studies and projects, and help expand facilities and research infrastructure to pursue emerging technologies. The Foundation would be the exclusive entity carrying out these activities, subject to governance rules, donor oversight, and reporting obligations.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Foundation is a separate nonprofit, not a federal agency.
A 11-member voting Board plus ex officio nonvoting members governs the Foundation.
The Foundation may receive donations and must maintain separate fund accounts from federal receipts.
Annual funding to the Foundation is authorized at not less than $500,000 and not more than $1,250,000, starting in 2026.
Comprehensive reporting, audits, and a GAO evaluation are mandated within five years.”],.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Establishment and Mission
The Secretary, through the Director, must establish a nonprofit corporation named the Foundation for Standards and Metrology. Its mission is to support NIST’s work to advance measurement science, technical standards, and technology, and to foster collaboration with researchers, higher education, industry, and other organizations to accelerate standard development and the commercialization of emerging technologies.
Activities of the Foundation
To carry out its mission, the Foundation may engage in a range of activities including international metrology and standards engagement, studies and projects on metrology, development of benchmarks and standards infrastructure, collaboration with researchers and industry, expansion of facilities, and education, outreach, and fellowships. These activities are designed to broaden the Institute’s impact and accelerate technology transfer.
Authority and Independence
The Foundation is the sole entity responsible for carrying out the listed activities and shall not be an agency or instrumentality of the Federal Government. It may receive funds and property from various sources, operate with tax-exempt status, and engage with private entities while maintaining independence from direct federal control.
Stakeholder Engagement
The Foundation shall convene and consult with representatives from the Institute, higher education, the private sector, nonprofits, and commercialization organizations to design and prioritize its activities, ensuring alignment with the Institute’s programs while incorporating external input.
Board of Directors
The Foundation’s governance is through a Board of Directors with 11 voting members and ex officio nonvoting members. Initial appointments come from a list developed in coordination with the National Academies, with representation across academia, industry, standards bodies, investors, and philanthropy. The Board sets bylaws, selects an Executive Director, and oversees the Foundation’s strategic direction.
Administration and Operations
An Executive Director (appointed by the Board) runs daily operations, hires staff, accepts donations, enters into contracts, and manages the Foundation’s activities. The Foundation must have defined control safeguards to avoid government mismanagement and ensure proper operation without undue federal influence.
Integrity and Conflicts of Interest
The Foundation must implement standards of conduct, financial disclosures, and conflict-of-interest policies, including recusal and waiver rules. It also imposes restrictions to mitigate financial conflicts of interest and malign foreign influence for officers and directors.
Intellectual Property
The Board must adopt written standards governing ownership and licensing of any intellectual property developed through Foundation activities or collaboration, ensuring clear rights and usage terms.
Funding and Related Provisions
Authorized appropriations allow transfers from the Department of Commerce to the Foundation, with a floor of $500,000 and a ceiling of $1,250,000 per fiscal year starting in 2026. The Foundation must keep funds separate from other accounts and comply with applicable limitations, while Chapter 10 of Title 5 does not apply; the Foundation may receive private donations and provide annual reports and audits.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Technology across all five countries.
Explore Technology in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- NIST and its associates, who gain a formal partner to advance metrology and standards across programs
- Universities and federally funded research centers, which benefit from collaboration opportunities, funding, and access to facilities
- Private sector standards bodies and technology firms, which gain accelerated pathways for standards development and commercialization
- State, tribal, and local governments engaged in standards and metrology initiatives
- Nonprofit and philanthropic organizations involved in research and technology transfer
Who Bears the Cost
- Private donors and grant makers may face heightened visibility and scrutiny through the Foundation’s reporting requirements
- Federal agencies may bear governance and oversight costs related to ensuring independence and avoiding conflicts of interest
- The public may bear the cost of increased administrative requirements in the short term if funding shifts occur between programs
- Institutions and individuals hosting or participating in Foundation activities may incur compliance and administrative costs to align with new bylaws and ethics rules
Key Issues
The Core Tension
How to maximize private-sector flexibility and philanthropy to accelerate public research goals without compromising public accountability, independence, and alignment with federal policy.
The bill creates a hybrid organization that operates with private funding and public mission, which raises questions about accountability, influence, and duplication of functions within a federal agency. While the Foundation is not an agency, it still interacts with NIST and federal research, raising concerns about transparency and the extent of nonfederal governance over federally funded work.
Bylaws and ethics provisions aim to mitigate these risks, but practical questions remain about donor influence, data sharing, and how the Foundation’s priorities align with federal policy. The balance between flexibility for private funding and the need for public trust will be crucial as the Foundation scales its activities.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.