This bill extends the authority to modify the Second Division Memorial in the District of Columbia. It does so by ensuring the authority provided by section 352 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 remains in effect through September 30, 2032.
Notably, the extension operates notwithstanding section 8903(e) of title 40, United States Code. The measure does not create new design requirements or funding; it simply preserves the existing modification framework so planning and any approved modifications can proceed under current statutory authority through the 2032 date.
At a Glance
What It Does
Extends the authority to modify the Second Division Memorial by keeping the NDAA 2018 Section 352 authority in force through 9/30/2032, overriding the constraint in 40 U.S.C. 8903(e).
Who It Affects
Federal agencies responsible for DC memorials (e.g., agencies with authority over commemorative works in the district) and the District of Columbia’s coordination entities.
Why It Matters
Provides long-term certainty for planning, design, and potential modifications to the memorial, avoiding gaps in authority that could disrupt maintenance or proposed changes.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill is a narrow extension of existing authority. It keeps intact the authority granted in NDAA 2018 for modifying the Second Division Memorial, extending that authority through September 30, 2032.
The extension is framed as a simple continuation, applying notwithstanding a separate limit in the Title 40 U.S.C. provision that might otherwise restrict modifications. No new design mandates, costs, or funding authorizations are created by this bill.
In practice, if Congress signs the measure, the responsible federal agencies can continue to consider, approve, and implement modifications to the memorial under the preexisting NDAA framework up to the 2032 deadline. The bill thus reduces the risk of regulatory or statutory gaps that could stall planning or execution of memorial work while preserving the scope of authority already established by NDAA 2018.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill extends the authority to modify the Second Division Memorial through 9/30/2032.
It preserves the NDAA 2018 Section 352 authority for memorial modifications.
It overrides potential limits in 40 U.S.C. 8903(e) for the purposes of modification.
No new funding authorization or design requirements are introduced by the bill.
The extension is narrowly targeted to the Second Division Memorial in DC and does not broaden other memorial authorities.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Extension of authority for modifications to Second Division Memorial
Section 1 extends the authority to modify the Second Division Memorial by ensuring the authority provided by section 352 of NDAA 2018 remains in effect through September 30, 2032. It states that this authority continues to apply notwithstanding the constraint found in 40 U.S.C. 8903(e). The provision is expressly limited to allowing ongoing or future modifications under the existing NDAA framework, without creating new modification powers beyond what was already authorized.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Federal agencies responsible for commemorative works in DC (e.g., agencies administering memorial properties) gain planning certainty and continuity.
- The District of Columbia government and local stakeholders benefit from stable guidance for memorial planning and coordination.
- Memorial project proponents and associated design/contracting teams can plan against a clear, extended horizon for potential modifications.
- Legislative oversight bodies maintain a predictable statutory baseline for memorial-related actions.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal agencies may incur ongoing administrative costs to manage modification plans through 2032.
- District and local agencies could incur coordination costs to align with the extended authority.
- Contractors and vendors engaged in memorial work may face longer project timelines or extended engagement under the extended authority.
- There is potential for budgetary pressure if modification plans advance toward expenditure during the extended period.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether extending a specific modification authority through 2032 strikes an appropriate balance between administrative continuity and the need for future, possibly updated, deliberation on memorial changes.
The extension preserves existing authority, which can help avoid administrative delays but also raises questions about long-term decision-making and oversight. Because the bill does not alter funding or create new design mandates, implementation will continue under existing appropriation levels and governance processes.
A smart reader should watch for future appropriations or authorization actions tied to any proposed modifications to the memorial, as those would determine actual project scope and funding.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.