Codify — Article

Death Penalty Factor Added for Illegal Aliens Who Kill U.S. Citizens

A federal bill adds an aggravating factor to capital sentencing, tying immigration status to enhanced penalties in killings of U.S. citizens.

The Brief

SB1675 amends 18 U.S.C. 3592(c) to insert a new death-penalty aggravating factor. The new provision—identified as paragraph (17) ILLEGAL ALIEN—applies when the defendant is an alien who violated federal immigration law and has been convicted of killing, attempting to kill, or conspiring to kill a United States citizen.

This is a change in the calculus for whether a federal sentence of death is warranted, not a new crime. The bill does not alter other existing aggravating factors, but it broadens the circumstances under which the death penalty may be considered in federal homicide cases involving aliens.

At a Glance

What It Does

The bill inserts a new paragraph (17) ILLEGAL ALIEN into 18 U.S.C. 3592(c). It defines the factor as: (A) the defendant is an alien who came to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of Federal law; and (B) the defendant has been convicted of killing, attempting to kill, or conspiring to kill a United States citizen.

Who It Affects

Targets federal capital cases in which the defendant is an alien unlawfully present in the U.S. and the offense involved killing a U.S. citizen. Prosecutors, federal sentencing authorities, and the courts handling death-penalty decisions would be the primary actors.

Why It Matters

This adds a status-based aggravator to the death-penalty calculus, linking immigration violations to the most severe punishment in certain homicide cases. It signals a policy choice to consider immigration context as a driver in sentencing decisions and could influence charging posture and trial strategy.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill changes how federal prosecutors and judges decide when to seek or impose the death penalty. It adds a new aggravating factor to the list used for capital sentencing.

Specifically, it adds a category for defendants who are aliens who unlawfully entered or remained in the United States and who have killed, attempted to kill, or conspired to kill a U.S. citizen. The new factor sits alongside existing aggravators used to determine if death is warranted in a given case.

The addition does not create a new crime; it simply expands the set of circumstances that can justify a death sentence in federal homicide prosecutions.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

Section 3592(c) gains a new paragraph (17) titled ILLEGAL ALIEN.

2

The new factor requires the defendant to be an alien who violated federal immigration law.

3

The defendant must have killed, attempted to kill, or conspired to kill a U.S. citizen.

4

This expands the set of circumstances under which the federal death penalty may be considered.

5

The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Cornyn and colleagues on May 8, 2025.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 1

Short Title

This section designates the act as the Justice for American Victims of Illegal Aliens Act. It does not create new substantive rules beyond naming the bill and signaling its legislative purpose.

Section 2

Death Penalty Aggravating Factors

This section amends 18 U.S.C. 3592(c) by inserting a new paragraph (17) ILLEGAL ALIEN. The new paragraph has two subparts: (A) establishes that the defendant is an alien who came to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of Federal law; and (B) requires that the defendant has been convicted of killing, attempting to kill, or conspiring to kill a United States citizen. The net effect is to add an immigration-status-based aggravating factor to the federal death-penalty calculus.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Criminal Justice across all five countries.

Explore Criminal Justice in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Federal prosecutors handling homicide cases involving aliens; they gain an additional aggravating factor to argue for the death penalty.
  • Federal judges presiding over capital cases; a defined aggravator helps structure sentencing decisions.
  • Victim advocacy groups and families seeking accountability in border-related or immigration-associated homicides; the factor aligns penalties with perceived severity in such cases.
  • Department of Justice and U.S. Attorneys’ Offices as the primary federal enforcers of capital punishment policy; clearer statutory triggers can streamline charging and sentencing decisions.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Defendants who are aliens unlawfully present in the United States facing enhanced penalties in capital cases.
  • Defense attorneys representing those defendants in federal death-penalty proceedings, who may contend with broader aggravators and heightened procedural complexity.
  • Federal trial and appellate courts handling capital cases, with potential increases in workload and resource use.
  • Taxpayers who bear the incremental costs of death-penalty investigations, trials, and appeals in complex immigration-related homicide cases.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

Balancing the desire for accountability in crimes involving unlawfully present aliens against concerns about equal treatment and the potential for immigration status to disproportionately influence life-or-death outcomes.

The addition of a status-based aggravator raises questions about the scope and application of the death penalty in immigration contexts. Implementers must verify a defendant’s immigration status, determine the interaction with existing aggravating factors, and ensure that the new provision is applied consistently across jurisdictions.

Critics may raise concerns about potential disparities in how immigration status influences capital sentencing, and about the risk that immigration-related elements could become a proxy for nationality or ethnicity in enforcement decisions. The bill leaves open questions about the standard of proof for immigration status in this specific aggravating factor and how it interfaces with existing procedures for death-penalty determinations.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.