Codify — Article

GRAIN DRY Act expands propane storage loan eligibility

GRAIN DRY broadens USDA storage facility loans to cover on-farm propane storage for agricultural production

The Brief

This bill amends the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 to clarify propane storage as an eligible use for funds provided under the storage facility loan program. It adds a new allowance that permits agricultural producers to construct or upgrade propane storage facilities that are used for agricultural production, with the definition of propane storage aligned to the CFR.

The change is narrowly targeted to on-farm energy and storage infrastructure that supports agricultural operations and efficiency.

At a Glance

What It Does

The statute’s storage facility loan program gains a new eligibility category for propane storage facilities tied to agricultural production, funded through existing loan authorities.

Who It Affects

Agricultural producers who operate on-farm drying or energy-intensive processes, and lenders underwriting these storage projects under the USDA-backed loan program.

Why It Matters

Expands financing options for rural infrastructure, potentially lowering energy costs and increasing grain drying efficiency, while aligning on-farm storage with established regulatory definitions.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

This measure is a targeted adjustment to existing financing for farm infrastructure. By amending the storage facility loan program, it explicitly allows loans to be used for constructing or upgrading propane storage facilities that serve agricultural production.

The key is that the propane storage must be used for agricultural activities and must comply with the CFR definition in 7 CFR 4279.2 as of the enactment date. The bill ties the new eligibility to the same loan framework already operating for storage facilities, meaning lenders and farmers can leverage USDA-backed financing for energy-related storage upgrades.

Practically, farms that rely on propane-powered drying or other propane-driven storage processes can seek funding to build or upgrade facilities, subject to existing underwriting standards and program rules. The change does not alter eligibility for other storage uses but adds propane storage as a specifically eligible use, harmonized with CFR standards to prevent scope creep.

For lenders, this expands the pool of eligible projects while maintaining the program’s risk controls and administrative structure.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The bill adds propane storage for agricultural production as an eligible use under the storage facility loan program.

2

Eligible borrowers are agricultural producers constructing or upgrading propane storage facilities for on-farm use.

3

Propane storage must be used for agricultural production as defined in 7 CFR 4279.2.

4

The amendment is narrowly scoped to on-farm propane storage aligned with CFR definitions.

5

It carries the GRAIN DRY Act short title (Growing Rural Agricultural Infrastructure Needs to Deliver Rising Yields Act).

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 1

Short title

Section 1 provides the act’s official name, the Growing Rural Agricultural Infrastructure Needs to Deliver Rising Yields Act (GRAIN DRY Act). This establishes the measure’s branding and helps identify its scope in legislative and administrative contexts.

Section 2

Storage facility loans — propane storage eligibility

Section 2 amends Section 1614(a) of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 to add a new clause that allows agricultural producers to obtain funds to construct or upgrade propane storage facilities, provided the propane is primarily used for agricultural production. The definition of propane storage follows 7 CFR 4279.2, ensuring consistent interpretation across federal programs and maintaining alignment with existing regulatory standards.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Infrastructure across all five countries.

Explore Infrastructure in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Agricultural producers who operate propane-powered drying or other on-farm storage processes and seek financing to expand or modernize facilities.
  • Rural cooperatives and larger farming operations with integrated storage infrastructure that rely on propane for production processes.
  • Lenders and financial institutions participating in the USDA storage facility loan program benefit from an expanded project pipeline and clarified eligibility criteria.

Who Bears the Cost

  • The federal loan program may incur administrative costs to adjust underwriting and compliance processes for the expanded eligibility.
  • Taxpayers may bear the cost of any future defaults or subsidies if loan performance declines, though current statute does not change funding levels.
  • Regulators and program managers must ensure CFR-based definitions are applied consistently to prevent misapplication of funds.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

Balancing expanded access to USDA-backed financing for essential on-farm energy storage with the risk of heightened loan demand and administrative complexity, all while keeping a tight, well-defined statutory boundary around what counts as propane storage for agricultural production.

The amendment tightens the scope to on-farm propane storage used for agricultural production, which helps avoid mission creep into non-agricultural propane storage projects. However, expanding eligibility could increase demand on the storage facility loan program, raising underwriting complexity and potential spillovers into related energy infrastructure investments.

The reliance on CFR 4279.2 for the definition of propane storage anchors the measure in existing federal standards, but it raises questions about how evolving CFR interpretations might affect eligibility over time and whether additional rules are needed to prevent misalignment with other energy programs.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.