The bill reauthorizes Title VIII nursing workforce development programs under the Public Health Service Act and broadens the roster of eligible nursing education programs. It updates the scope to explicitly include advanced practice tracks (nurse practitioners, nurse-midwives, nurse anesthetists, and clinical nurse specialists) and enhances the support for clinical education through updated costs and preceptors.
The package also strengthens capacity by modernizing instructional infrastructure and increasing faculty and student recruitment, and it raises funding for 2026–2030 to support these changes.
At a Glance
What It Does
It amends the Public Health Service Act to broaden eligibility for nursing education programs, adds modern training infrastructure (equipment, simulation, telehealth, labs), and expands capacity through more faculty and students. It also authorizes higher annual appropriations for 2026–2030.
Who It Affects
Nursing schools, nursing students pursuing advanced degrees, faculty and clinical educators, and health-care facilities that host students for clinical education.
Why It Matters
Addressing nursing shortages requires expanding both training capacity and modernizing how nursing is taught, financed by higher, predictable funding through 2030.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
SB1874 amends the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize Title VIII nursing workforce programs and to broaden the types of nursing education programs eligible for federal support. Specifically, it adds for the first time explicit eligibility for advanced practice tracks—nurse practitioners, nurse-midwives, nurse anesthetists, and clinical nurse specialists—within the advanced nursing education grants.
It also tightens up funding language to cover costs for clinical education and preceptors, and makes other small but meaningful refinements to ensure the grants support comprehensive training experiences.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill expands eligible nursing programs to include NP, CNM, CRNA, and CNS tracks under Section 811 amendments.
Section 831 adds funding for audiovisual equipment, simulation and augmented reality resources, telehealth technologies, and enhanced laboratories.
It mandates increased faculty and student capacity at schools of nursing to address shortages (new Section 831(3)).
The act obligates partnerships with health care facilities to expand clinical education opportunities.
Funding for Title VIII programs rises for 2026–2030 to $184.337 million annually (and related program funding to $121.135 million).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Advanced Nursing Education Grants – broader program eligibility
Section 2 expands the scope of Section 811 by including additional nursing programs and explicitly listing nurse practitioner, nurse-midwifery, nurse anesthesia, and clinical nurse specialist tracks as qualifying components of the grants. It also revises cost definitions to ensure that fees cover clinical education and preceptors, and replaces references to the American College of Nurse-Midwives with updated terminology to reflect broader program oversight.
Strengthening Capacity for Nurse Education and Practice
Section 3 reorganizes Part D of Title VIII, removing the old ‘BASIC’ heading and updating subsection (a) to include modern training modalities and facilities—such as audiovisual equipment, simulation, augmented reality resources, telehealth technologies, and virtual/physical laboratories. It adds a new subsection (3) mandating increased faculty and student numbers to address shortages, and it revises the survivor-related provisions in subsection (b) to include survivors of sexual assault. It also adds a new subsection (5) permitting partnerships with health care facilities to expand clinical education.
Authorization of Appropriations
Section 4 raises the funding baseline for Title VIII programs. It increases the annual appropriation for 2026–2030 to $184,337,000 and adjusts the related program funding to $121,135,000 for the same period, signaling a substantial, longer-term funding commitment to nursing workforce development.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Nursing students pursuing advanced practice tracks (NPs, CNMs, CRNAs, CNS) gain expanded access to federal support and training opportunities.
- Schools of nursing and nursing programs gain capacity to enroll more students and upgrade facilities and equipment.
- Nursing faculty and clinical educators gain support for expanded programs and precepting opportunities.
- Health care facilities, nurse-managed clinics, and community health centers gain structured partnerships to provide clinical education opportunities.
- Communities experiencing nursing shortages benefit from increased training capacity and a larger, more capable workforce.
Who Bears the Cost
- The federal government, via HRSA, must fund higher annual appropriations (2026–2030) to support expanded programs.
- Nursing schools and universities will need to invest in faculty expansion, facilities, and equipment to absorb more students.
- Health care facilities hosting students may incur costs related to clinical supervision, space, and equipment upgrades.
- Clinical preceptors and instructors may require compensation or incentive structures to accommodate expanded training roles.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing rapid expansion of nursing education capacity with the need to maintain high-quality training and sustainable clinical placements.
The bill introduces a positive feedback loop: expanding capacity and modern training infrastructure should improve workforce supply, but scaling up quickly requires careful management of quality controls, faculty recruitment, and clinical placement capacity. Implementation challenges include ensuring adequate compensation for preceptors, aligning new training modalities with licensure and accreditation standards, and preventing misallocation of funds if distributions are uneven across regions or institutions.
The expansion also relies on robust partnerships between academic institutions and health care facilities to realize the envisioned clinical education opportunities.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.