The Remove the Stain Act directs the appropriate Service Secretary to rescind every Medal of Honor awarded for actions at Wounded Knee Creek on December 29, 1890, and to remove those recipients’ names from the official Medal of Honor Roll. The bill limits its remedial steps to administrative removal from the rolls, explicitly says rescued medals need not be returned, and preserves any federal benefits the individuals or their estates currently receive.
This is primarily a symbolic and record-correcting measure: it responds to tribal resolutions and historical findings about the Wounded Knee Massacre and asserts that the highest U.S. military decoration should not honor participation in that event. For defense officials, archivists, and tribal leaders, the bill creates a narrow mechanism to alter official honors and a precedent for Congress to revisit historical awards without changing benefits or creating criminal consequences.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill rescinds all Medals of Honor awarded for actions at Wounded Knee Creek on December 29, 1890, and requires the Secretary concerned to remove those names from the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll maintained under 10 U.S.C. 1134a. It also states that no one must return a physical medal and that the rescission will not strip any federal benefits.
Who It Affects
Directly affected parties include the Departments of Defense and the military departments responsible for the Medal of Honor Roll, descendants or estates of the named recipients, Native American tribes (notably Lakota and the Great Sioux Nation), historians and museums that hold or display medals and citations, and veterans’ service organizations.
Why It Matters
The bill is a formal congressional repudiation of award decisions tied to a documented massacre of unarmed Native Americans; it changes the official honors record without creating criminal penalties or removing benefits. It establishes a congressional mechanism for retroactive rescission that could be referenced in future challenges to historical military awards.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill has a short title and an extended set of findings that lay out the historical record and the policy rationale: it cites contemporary military correspondence, a Senate Concurrent Resolution describing the Wounded Knee engagement as a massacre of hundreds of Lakota men, women, and children, and later tribal and Native American organizational resolutions requesting revocation of the awards. Those findings frame the measure as corrective: Congress is declaring that the Medal of Honor should not recognize participation in the Wounded Knee Massacre.
The operative text is narrowly focused. It rescinds ‘‘each Medal of Honor awarded for acts at Wounded Knee Creek, Lakota Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, South Dakota, on December 29, 1890.’’ The bill directs the ‘‘Secretary concerned’’ to remove those names from the statutory Medal of Honor Roll (the list that the Services maintain under 10 U.S.C. 1134a).
The statute is administrative: it does not create new penalties, does not demand the physical return of any medal, and explicitly preserves federal benefits for individuals or their estates.Practically, implementation will fall to the Defense Department and the specific military departments (Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard) to correct official registries, citations, and public records. The bill does not prescribe a timeline, a notice requirement to families, or procedures for updating headstones, museums, or other commemorations.
It also confines its scope to the single event and date specified; it does not create a general review board or a process to revisit other awards outside this narrow context.Because the bill leaves benefits intact and declines to require medal returns, its real effect is on formal recognition and the archival record: the names will be removed from the official roll and, by implication, those awards will be treated as rescinded in official lists and congressional records. That combination—symbolic repudiation plus administrative correction—aims to address tribal requests for redress while minimizing legal disruption to benefits and estates.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill rescinds every Medal of Honor awarded for acts at Wounded Knee Creek on December 29, 1890.
It requires the Secretary concerned to remove those individuals from the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll maintained under 10 U.S.C. 1134a.
The statute explicitly provides that no person is required to return a physical Medal of Honor that is rescinded by this Act.
The Act states that the rescission shall not be construed to deny any individual any benefit from the Federal Government.
The legislative findings cite that 20 Medals of Honor were awarded in connection with Wounded Knee and reference tribal resolutions and a 2007 National Congress of American Indians request urging revocation.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title—'Remove the Stain Act'
This brief provision gives the measure its public name. That label signals the bill’s intent and will shape how agencies and stakeholders frame subsequent administrative actions and communications, but it carries no legal effect beyond identification.
Findings describing the Wounded Knee Massacre and calls for revocation
Section 2 compiles historical material the sponsors rely on: a contemporaneous Army telegram describing friendly-fire and civilian deaths, a citation of Senate Concurrent Resolution 153, the number of Medals awarded in other conflicts for context, and tribal resolutions (Cheyenne River Sioux and the National Congress of American Indians) asking for revocation. These findings do not create enforceable rights but establish Congress’s factual framing and the policy justification for the narrow remedial step in Section 3.
Rescission—scope and operative mandate
Subsection (a) is the operative rescission: it removes legal recognition for any Medal of Honor award tied to acts at Wounded Knee Creek on the specified date. The language is tightly confined to that event and date, which limits the bill’s legal footprint and reduces ambiguity about which awards are affected.
Update of official rolls and records
Subsection (b) requires the 'Secretary concerned' to remove the named individuals from the statutory Medal of Honor Roll maintained under 10 U.S.C. 1134a. That triggers an administrative duty for the relevant military departments to change official personnel and honors records, public databases, and any Service-maintained registries—an action with archival, ceremonial, and informational consequences.
Non-return of medals and preservation of benefits
Section 3(c) states no person may be required to return a physical Medal of Honor; 3(d) says the Act does not deny any federal benefit. Those two constraints limit downstream legal and financial consequences: rescission here is primarily declaratory and symbolic rather than punitive or remedial with respect to pay, pension, or burial benefits.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Defense across all five countries.
Explore Defense in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Lakota and other Native American tribes (including the Cheyenne River Sioux and Great Sioux Nation): the bill responds directly to tribal resolutions and public requests to remove official honors that commemorate a massacre of unarmed civilians, offering a formal congressional repudiation.
- Historians, educators, and cultural institutions: removal from the official roll clarifies the federal record and supports curricula, interpretive materials, and exhibits that contextualize Wounded Knee as a massacre rather than a conventional military engagement.
- Advocacy organizations focused on historical justice: groups that have campaigned for rescission gain a concrete legislative remedy validating their long-standing claims.
- The integrity of the Medal of Honor as an institution: by distinguishing awards tied to a massacre from awards for battlefield valor, the bill asserts a particular standard for what the decoration should represent.
Who Bears the Cost
- Department of Defense and military departments (Office of the Secretary, Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard): they must identify records, update statutory rolls under 10 U.S.C. 1134a, amend citations and databases, coordinate with archives and cemeteries, and manage communications with families and the public.
- Descendants and families of the named recipients: even though benefits remain, families may face reputational harm or emotional distress from a formal congressional rescission of honors earned by ancestors.
- Veterans’ service organizations and unit associations: these groups will likely confront member sentiment and potential morale questions, and may need to respond publicly or administratively to constituents’ concerns.
- Museums, memorials, and genealogical repositories: organizations that display medals, citations, or interpretive materials will need to revise labels, exhibits, and public descriptions to reflect the rescission.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between delivering a symbolic, historical reckoning for Native American communities and preserving the perceived finality and institutional stability of military honors: the measure seeks to restore moral clarity about Wounded Knee without stripping survivors or families of tangible benefits, but that trade-off leaves unresolved the emotional and reputational consequences for descendants and sets a precedent for further retroactive challenges to awards.
The bill creates a narrow administrative fix while leaving open several implementation and legal questions. It directs removal from the statutory Medal of Honor Roll but does not set a timetable, a notice procedure for recipients’ families, or standards for how to treat secondary records (headstones, museum displays, Service histories).
The practical effect depends on how quickly and comprehensively the military departments update databases, burial records, and public-facing materials. Agencies will need to coordinate historians, public affairs officers, and cemetery managers to implement the change without creating inconsistent or confusing records.
There is also a legal and institutional tension over authority and precedent. Congress clearly can legislate the content of public rolls and honors; the bill exercises that power.
Still, rescinding awards long after issuance raises questions about finality, retroactive moral judgment, and the possibility of similar campaigns to revisit other historical awards. Because the Act preserves benefits and forbids requiring the physical return of medals, it minimizes legal disruption but does not eliminate disputes over symbolism, historical interpretation, and the emotional impact on families and veterans’ communities.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.