The bill seeks to sanction the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the Palestinian Authority (PA) for maintaining a system of compensation that pays terrorists and their families. It defines the “system of compensation” to include payments, salaries, and benefits described in the Taylor Force Act and related programs.
The President would apply sanctions to foreign persons who served in PLO/PA roles or who facilitated the compensation system, and to financial institutions that process or enable related transactions. The act also creates a framework for enforcement under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and sets a termination trigger if the Secretary of State certifies that the compensation system has ceased.
At a Glance
What It Does
Not later than 90 days after enactment, the President must sanction foreign persons who held positions in the PLO/PA or who helped run the compensation system, and who provided payments or benefits to terrorists or their families. The sanctions include blocking property and visa prohibitions.
Who It Affects
Foreign officials and entities tied to the PLO/PA compensation system, plus foreign financial institutions that process or facilitate related payments; United States persons and institutions interacting with designated parties.
Why It Matters
It builds on the Taylor Force Act to deny U.S. support to actors who sustain terrorism through compensation schemes, and it extends a sanctions framework to accountable actors in the network surrounding Hamas and allied groups.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill targets a financial and administrative network that pays terrorists and their families within the PLO/PA structure. It defines the system of compensation by reference to existing law and creates sanctions for those who participate in or support it.
The sanctions operate on two tracks: individuals and entities (Section 4) and financial institutions (Section 5). The key tools are asset blocking and visa restrictions for designated foreign persons and prohibitions on correspondent and payable-through accounts for implicated foreign institutions.
The act also gives Congress a mechanism to request determinations of whether a person meets the sanction criteria, with the President required to return a determination in a timely fashion. A termination trigger exists: if the Secretary of State certifies that the compensation system has ceased, the act can be rolled back.
Regulations to implement these provisions would be issued within 60 days of enactment.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The President must impose sanctions on foreign persons tied to the PLO/PA compensation system within 90 days of enactment.
Sanctions include blocking property and visa ineligibility for designated individuals.
Foreign financial institutions that facilitate or transact with sanctioned entities face restricted access to U.S. financial networks.
Termination of sanctions requires a Secretary of State certification that the compensation system has ceased.
There is a formal process for congressional requests to obtain determinations and a required presidential report on those determinations.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
Designates the act as the PLO and PA Terror Payments Accountability Act of 2025. This section establishes the naming convention for the statute and clarifies its scope as it relates to sanctions policy and enforcement.
Findings and Policy
Outlines congressional findings about the PLO/PA compensation system and articulates U.S. policy to hold the PLO and PA accountable through sanctions for payments to terrorists and their families. The section ties the policy to national security interests and references the Taylor Force Act as background authority.
Definitions
Defines terms used throughout the act, including 'act of terrorism', 'foreign person', 'system of compensation', and 'United States person'. It also clarifies what constitutes 'knowing' involvement and identifies the relevant committees as oversight bodies.
Imposition of Sanctions on Foreign Persons Supporting Terrorism
Describes the core sanctions regime. Within 90 days of enactment, the President must sanction foreign persons who served in PLO/PA roles or who facilitated the compensation system, as well as those who provided direct payments or benefits to terrorists or their families. Sanctions include blocking property and visa-related penalties, with immediate effects on existing visas where applicable.
Sanctions on Financial Institutions
Extends sanctions to foreign financial institutions that process or enable payments related to the system of compensation or that conduct significant transactions with designated persons. The sanctions prohibit opening or maintaining correspondent or payable-through accounts in the United States for sanctioned institutions, grounding enforcement in established U.S. banking law.
Termination
Provides a termination mechanism: the sanctions have no force if the Secretary of State certifies that the compensation system has ceased and that credible reforms are in place. This creates a conditional sunset of the sanctions contingent on verifiable cessation of the system.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Foreign Affairs across all five countries.
Explore Foreign Affairs in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- U.S. national security policymakers and the Executive Branch, who gain a defined tool to disrupt funding streams that support terrorism.
- Israel and regional allied partners, who seek to reduce financial support for terrorist organizations and related networks.
- Families of terrorism victims and the broader public, who benefit from reduced resources funding extremist acts.
- The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the Treasury Department, which gain a clearer mandate and framework for enforcement.
- Congressional committees, which receive a formal mechanism to request determinations and oversight of sanction targets.
Who Bears the Cost
- Foreign individuals designated under the act, facing asset freezes and travel bans.
- Foreign financial institutions engaged in sanctioned transactions, facing restrictions on access to U.S. financial systems.
- U.S. banks and businesses that must implement enhanced compliance measures and monitoring.
- The Palestinian Authority and PLO leadership, facing heightened financial and diplomatic pressure.
- Civilian populations in the Palestinian territories who rely on compensation payments and could experience secondary economic disruption.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether aggressive financial sanctions against all actors connected to the compensation network will disrupt terrorism financing without unduly harming ordinary civilians and undermining broader peace efforts.
The act tightly links sanctions to the specific 'system of compensation' described in Taylor Force Act provisions. It relies on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act for property blocking and on visa powers to restrict entry.
The implementation path requires interim regulations within 60 days, creating potential transitional gaps. A central tension is ensuring precise targeting to avoid collateral harm to humanitarian channels and civilian populations while maintaining pressure on actors who fund or enable terrorism.
The termination provision introduces an unknown tail risk: if cessation is not verifiable, the sanctions could remain in place longer than anticipated, potentially complicating regional dynamics and humanitarian considerations.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.