The Global Respect Act of 2025 would require the President to identify foreign individuals who are responsible for, or complicit in, violations of LGBTQI rights and to impose targeted sanctions. The law creates a regularly updated list of designated foreign persons and authorizes the use of visa ineligibility and removal actions against those listed, with options for a classified annex when national security warrants.
It also expands reporting and oversight, requiring public guidance on submitting possible names and annual congressional reporting on actions and list dynamics. In addition, the bill directs new tracking of violence or discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity in foreign countries and embeds related reporting within existing U.S. aid accountability frameworks.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires identifying foreign persons responsible for LGBTQI rights violations, publishes a regularly updated list, and imposes visa ineligibility and potential removal for those on the list. It allows a classified annex for sensitive entries and mandates periodic updates and public submission pathways.
Who It Affects
Foreign individuals on the sanctioned list, U.S. visa and immigration administrators (State and Homeland Security), and partner governments tracking violations; it also impacts NGOs and foreign entities that monitor human rights.
Why It Matters
It creates a formal accountability mechanism for LGBTQI rights abuses abroad, increases transparency around sanctions, and ties human rights concerns to U.S. visa and immigration tools, while mandating ongoing oversight to congress and the public.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Shortly after enactment, the act requires the President to identify foreign persons who are responsible for serious violations of LGBTQI rights. Those individuals would be added to a public list, with updates every six months; in many cases, they would be ineligible for visas to enter the United States, and U.S. authorities would be empowered to revoke existing visas and remove listed individuals from the country.
The bill also allows a classified annex for national security reasons, as long as the President provides timely justification to Congress. A public submission channel would exist to propose names for consideration.
The act imposes a framework of sanctions anchored in transparency and due process: listing is based on credible information and includes an opportunity for removal if the person did not engage in the activity, was prosecuted appropriately, or showed credible reform. It requires the President to report annually on who was added or removed and why, and to coordinate with other countries on similar actions where appropriate.
In addition, the bill expands U.S. reporting on foreign-aid programs to track violence or discrimination tied to sexual orientation or gender identity, ensuring that human rights abuses are reflected in annual country reports and related assessments.Together, these provisions link accountability for LGBTQI rights abuses to U.S. immigration controls, foreign policy pressure, and public oversight, creating a more explicit incentive structure for governments to prevent violations and for the United States to respond quickly when they occur.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The President must identify foreign persons responsible for LGBTQI rights violations and publish a list within 180 days of enactment, with ongoing updates every 180 days.
Persons on the list face visa ineligibility and potential removal from the United States; the list can include a classified annex for national security reasons.
The act requires public submission of candidate names and provides for congressional oversight and reporting on additions and removals.
Waivers are available under narrow national-security or international-law obligations, with notice to Congress.
The bill expands annual reporting on human rights practices to include violence or discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity in foreign countries.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
This Act may be cited as the Global Respect Act of 2025. The short title sets the framework for the ensuing provisions that target violations of LGBTQI rights abroad and align sanctions with human rights objectives.
Findings
The findings articulate a global context where LGBTQI individuals face discrimination and violence, with a significant share of countries criminalizing consensual same-sex relations and some imposing the death penalty. The section underlines the US interest in protecting fundamental rights and the need to address impunity and abuses through diplomatic and legal tools.
Definitions
Key terms include foreign person, admission, and appropriate congressional committees. A foreign person is a citizen or national of a foreign country or an entity not organized under U.S. law. The definitions frame who is subject to listing and how actions interact with immigration controls.
Identification List—Initial List
Within 180 days of enactment and every 180 days thereafter, the President must submit a list of foreign persons determined to be responsible for or complicit in violations described in the bill. Violations include torture, prolonged detention, disappearances, and other flagrant denials of life, liberty, or security, measured against the target’s actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity, or sex characteristics.
Identification List—Updates
The President must periodically update the list as new credible information becomes available, ensuring the list reflects current assessments of responsibility or complicity in violations. This keeps sanctions timely and relevant.
Removal from List
A listed individual may be removed if credible information shows non-engagement in the activity, appropriate prosecution occurred, or credible reform occurred. The President must report the removal rationale to Congress within 15 days of the decision.
Form of List and Annexes
The list must be published in unclassified form in the Federal Register, with a possible classified annex when national security requires. Any annex must be justified to Congress with a public‑facing rationale and accompanied by timely disclosures when feasible.
Public Submission of Information
The President must issue public guidance on how individuals or groups can submit names for consideration, ensuring a transparent process for information gathering.
Requests from Congress
The President must consider information supplied by committee chairs or ranking members in determining listing decisions, and respond within 120 days. Removal and other actions may also be subject to classified communications if necessary for national security.
Inadmissibility and Removal
A listed foreign person is ineligible for a visa and cannot be admitted to the United States. Visa revocations and removals are to be carried out by the State Department and DHS, with regulations required within 180 days to implement the procedures.
Sense of Congress on Additional Sanctions
Congress urges the President to use existing authorities to impose targeted sanctions beyond listing where appropriate, reinforcing accountability for the most severe violations.
Report to Congress
Annually, the State Department must report on actions taken under the Act, including the number of additions and removals, and provide an analysis of trends. The report should include coordination efforts with other governments where relevant.
Discrimination Tracking and Reporting
The State Department’s bureau tracks violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or sex characteristics and integrates this into annual country reports under the Foreign Assistance Act. This ensures consistent monitoring and reporting on human rights abuses in foreign countries.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Foreign Affairs across all five countries.
Explore Foreign Affairs in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- LGBTIQ+ individuals in countries with high levels of violence or legal discrimination, who gain visibility and potential protection through sanctions or international pressure.
- Rights-focused NGOs and international human rights watchdogs gain clearer mechanisms to document abuses and advocate for accountability.
- U.S. diplomats, embassies, and consulates benefit from a structured tool to advance human rights diplomacy and visa policy alignment with values.
- Partner governments seeking to reform practices may be incentivized by sanctions to implement or accelerate protections for LGBTQI individuals.
- Congressional oversight offices gain measurable indicators for evaluating sanctions policy and human rights progress.
Who Bears the Cost
- Foreign officials or entities listed face travel restrictions and reputational harm, potentially impacting diplomacy or business relationships.
- U.S. government agencies (State, DHS) incur administrative costs to maintain the list, process waivers, and manage annual reporting.
- Potential negative humanitarian or humanitarian‑aid delivery implications if sanctions intersect with essential services or family reunifications in some cases.
- Private sector entities involved in international travel or visa processing bear compliance and due-diligence costs to align with the new regime.
- Civil society groups in some jurisdictions may face political pushback when advocating for listing or data submission.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether a robust, transparent sanctions framework against LGBTQI rights violators can be implemented quickly enough to deter abuses without compromising due process, misidentifying individuals, or compromising humanitarian and diplomatic objectives.
The act raises tensions between public accountability and sensitive foreign information. While listing foreign persons serves as a deterrent and provides a clear accountability pathway, there is risk of misidentification, incomplete information, and potential chilling effects on humanitarian or journalist activities in affected countries.
The option to place entries in a classified annex presents a trade-off between national security interests and public transparency, which could complicate congressional oversight and public scrutiny. The reliance on credible information from diverse sources, including NGOs, must be safeguarded against manipulation, and due process protections should be considered in listing and delisting procedures.
Finally, expanding reporting on violence and discrimination links human rights concerns to aid policy, but requires careful integration to avoid over‑breadth or politicization of aid decisions.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.