The Taiwan International Solidarity Act updates the Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act of 2019 to require the United States, in its role as a member of international organizations, to oppose any PRC efforts to resolve Taiwan’s status by distorting the decisions, language, policies, or procedures of those organizations. It adds clarifications about UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI), stating the resolution did not address Taiwan’s representation or sovereignty and that the United States opposes any initiative to change Taiwan’s status without the consent of the people of Taiwan.
The bill also expands the advocacy toolkit by instructing U.S. representatives to use the voice, vote, and influence of the United States to resist PRC distortions in the organizations described in the TAIPEI Act. It further asks the United States to encourage allies to oppose PRC efforts to undermine Taiwan’s official diplomatic relationships.
Finally, it broadens the reporting requirement to cover any prior or ongoing PRC attempts to promote a “One China” position within international bodies and in Taiwan’s ties with other countries.
At a Glance
What It Does
The act requires U.S. representatives in international organizations to use their voice, vote, and influence to oppose PRC distortion of Taiwan’s status. It adds clarifications about UN2758 and expands advocacy and reporting obligations under the TAIPEI framework.
Who It Affects
U.S. diplomats and agencies involved in international bodies, international organizations where Taiwan seeks participation, and allied governments coordinating with the United States on Taiwan policy.
Why It Matters
By codifying an active defense of Taiwan’s status in international forums, the bill reduces ambiguity for U.S. officials and allies, sets expectations for IO behavior, and signals a more coordinated front against PRC efforts to redefine Taiwan’s international standing.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Taiwan International Solidarity Act upgrades the 2019 TAIPEI Act to give the United States a clearer mandate to push back against the PRC’s attempts to distort Taiwan’s status in international organizations. The core mechanism is to require U.S. representatives in relevant bodies to exercise the United States’ voice, vote, and influence to resist language, policies, or procedures that would undermine Taiwan’s status.
The measure also adds explicit language about how the United States interprets UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI), noting that the resolution did not settle questions about Taiwan’s representation or sovereignty, and that the United States opposes any initiative to alter Taiwan’s status without the consent of Taiwan’s people. In practice, this means more proactive U.S. diplomacy within the United Nations and other multilateral forums, where issues of Taiwan’s participation and recognition are debated.
Beyond IO advocacy, the bill directs the United States to encourage allies and partners to oppose PRC efforts to weaken Taiwan’s official diplomatic relationships and to resist the PRC’s broader attempts to shape international alignment with its One China position. It also broadens the reporting requirements under the TAIPEI Act to include information on PRC attempts to promote One China within international organizations and in Taiwan’s ties with other countries.
Taken together, the amendments aim to deter unilateral changes to Taiwan’s international status by reinforcing a coalition approach and a transparent, evidence-based reporting regime for policymakers.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill mandates U.S. representatives in international organizations to use voice, vote, and influence to resist PRC distortions of Taiwan’s status.
UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI) is clarified as not addressing Taiwan’s representation or sovereignty; the U.S. opposes unilateral changes to Taiwan’s status without its people's consent.
The act instructs U.S. officials to advocate within international bodies to resist PRC distortions of decisions, language, or procedures about Taiwan.
The legislation requires allies and partners to oppose the PRC’s efforts to undermine Taiwan’s diplomatic relationships.
Amendments take effect upon enactment and apply to the first post-enactment report under the amended statute.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
This Act may be cited as the Taiwan International Solidarity Act. It lays the groundwork for amendments to the existing TAIPEI Act of 2019 and designates the Act’s purpose and scope for U.S. diplomacy in international organizations.
Clarification Regarding United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758
Section 2(a) of the TAIPEI Act is amended to remove a preface label and adds new subsection language clarifying that UNGA Resolution 2758 did not resolve Taiwan’s representation in the United Nations or related organizations, nor did it adjudicate Taiwan’s sovereignty. It also states that the United States opposes any initiative to change Taiwan’s status without the consent of the people of Taiwan.
United States Advocacy for International Organizations to Resist PRC Distortions
Section 3 adds a new directive to the TAIPEI Act: U.S. representatives in international organizations should use the voice, vote, and influence of the United States to advocate that those organizations resist the PRC’s efforts to distort decisions, language, policies, or procedures regarding Taiwan.
Opposing PRC Efforts to Undermine Taiwan’s Ties and Partnerships
Section 4 adds a new provision encouraging, as appropriate, U.S. allies and partners to oppose the PRC’s attempts to undermine Taiwan’s official diplomatic relationships and partnerships with other states, including nations with which Taiwan does not maintain formal diplomatic relations.
Reporting on PRC Attempts to Promote its One China Position
Section 5 expands the reporting requirement to include information on PRC attempts to undermine Taiwan’s membership or status within relevant international organizations and Taiwan’s ties with other countries, with the amendment taking effect upon enactment and applying to the first report after enactment.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Foreign Affairs across all five countries.
Explore Foreign Affairs in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Taiwan’s government and its people benefit from clearer, more robust international advocacy and protection of Taiwan’s status in multilateral forums.
- U.S. diplomats and agencies engaged in international organizations gain explicit policy direction and a broader toolkit to defend Taiwan’s standing.
- U.S. allies and partners that share democratic values benefit from a coordinated stance against PRC efforts to distort Taiwan’s status.
- International organizations that value transparent representation and adherence to established procedures gain clearer expectations about member roles and advocacy from major powers.
- U.S. legislative and oversight bodies gain better information streams through enhanced reporting requirements on PRC activity related to Taiwan.
Who Bears the Cost
- The People’s Republic of China and its diplomatic apparatus face increased resistance in multilateral forums and potential reputational costs from aggressive advocacy by the United States and its partners.
- U.S. government agencies may incur higher resource needs to staff, coordinate with allies, and produce expanded reporting on PRC activities.
- Certain international forums that prefer lower-friction diplomacy with Beijing may experience increased tension or pushback from a more assertive U.S.-led coalition on Taiwan issues.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between a rigorous, proactive defense of Taiwan’s international status within IOs and the risk that heightened confrontation could complicate broader diplomatic relationships, including those with countries reluctant to align fully against PRC pressures.
The act embeds a more assertive U.S. posture in international organizations to defend Taiwan’s status, but it also raises questions about balance and implementation. A more aggressive advocacy mandate could strain multilateral diplomacy with PRC-aligned actors and complicate efforts to maintain broad-based engagement in IOs where consensus may be essential.
Additionally, expanding reporting requirements will demand new data collection, coordination among U.S. agencies, and alignment with existing oversight mechanisms, all of which could require additional resources and clear internal processes to avoid ambiguity.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.