The PART Act would push federal agencies to update theft-prevention standards to include catalytic converters and to require marking and tracking of these parts. It defines catalytic converters and expands marking requirements, while also creating a grant program to support VIN stamping and requiring sellers to retain purchaser and vehicle information.
These changes aim to deter theft, improve recovery rates, and enable enforcement. They impose new obligations on manufacturers, dealers, salvage operations, and law enforcement, and they establish penalties for theft and trafficking in catalytic converters and related parts.
At a Glance
What It Does
The NHTSA must propose revisions to theft-prevention standards to include catalytic converters, require that converters be marked, and update CFR regulations to apply these requirements to vehicles covered by existing rules.
Who It Affects
Automakers, auto dealers, repair shops, fleets, salvage yards, and law-enforcement agencies will need to comply with marking, reporting, and VIN-identification requirements.
Why It Matters
Marking and tracing converters create a paper trail and physical evidence that facilitate investigations, deter theft, and aid in recovery and prosecution across jurisdictions.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Section 2 defines what counts as a catalytic converter for federal purposes, including standard converters, diesel oxidation catalysts, and diesel particulate filters. This broad definition ensures all common converter technologies are covered by subsequent rules.
Section 3 directs the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to propose regulatory changes within 180 days. The agency must revise the theft-prevention standard to cover catalytic converters and to require marking under the current parts framework, as well as to ensure those markings apply to vehicles within the current regulatory scope.
The HTTP process includes establishing mark standards that could include a unique identifier linked to the vehicle’s VIN, accessible to law enforcement.Section 4 creates a grant program to fund VIN stamping and related activities. Eligible entities include law-enforcement agencies, auto dealers, fleets, repair shops, and nonprofits.
The program aims to cap at seven million dollars (sourced from prior ARP funding) and prioritize areas with high theft risk and vehicles subject to new marking requirements, with rules for how stamping should be performed.Section 5 adjusts purchase and retention rules for catalytic converters. It expands the list of regulated parts, requires sellers to collect and retain seller information and the vehicle or part’s identification number for at least two years, prohibits cash sales in favor of traceable payments, and directs enforcement regulations.
Section 6 adds criminal penalties for theft and trafficking in catalytic converters and related precious metals, expanding existing federal law and creating new offenses with penalties up to five years, plus provisions for concurrent sentences. The bill also provisions for strengthening related prosecutorial authorities, including the expansion of “chop shop” definitions to cover unlawful handling of converters and parts.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires NPRMs within 180 days to revise theft-prevention standards to include catalytic converters.
Converters must be marked with a unique identification number, and regulatory alignment with 541.5 and Part 543 is required.
A grant program (up to $7 million) will fund VIN stamping and related activities, prioritizing high-need areas.
Sellers must retain purchaser information and the vehicle or part’s identification number for at least two years, with payments requiring traceable methods.
Criminal penalties for theft and trafficking of catalytic converters are expanded, including potential prison time and broader enforcement provisions.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definition of Catalytic Converter
Section 2 defines catalytic converters to include any device in the exhaust system that uses catalytic action to reduce HC and CO emissions to CO2 and H2O, plus a diesel oxidation catalyst and a diesel particulate filter. This ensures all common converter technologies fall under the act’s later rules and penalties, reducing ambiguity for enforcement and compliance.
Regulatory Revisions for Catalytic Converters
Section 3 requires the Administrator of NHTSA to issue NPRMs within 180 days to revise the theft-prevention standard to include catalytic converters and to update Part 543 to require marking of catalytic converters. It also directs alignment of Section 541.5 standards and Part 565 vehicle coverage so the changes apply broadly to applicable vehicles, creating a unified federal approach to converter security.
Grant Program for VIN Stamping
Section 4 establishes a grant program to fund covered activities related to stamping catalytic converters with VIN or unique part identifiers. Eligible entities include law-enforcement agencies, auto dealers, fleets, repair shops, and nonprofits. The program specifies that stamping is high-visibility, uses durable encoding, and is not wages-funded, with priority given to high-need areas and vehicles subject to the new marking requirements.
Purchase and Seller-Information Requirements
Section 5 expands the seller-control framework by including catalytic converters in record-keeping requirements, mandating retention of seller information and vehicle or unique part identifiers for at least two years. It prohibits cash sales of marked converters and requires traceable payment forms, with enforcement regulations to be issued by the Attorney General.
Criminal Penalties and Related Offenses
Section 6 adds a new theft-of-catalytic-converter offense under 18 U.S.C. and expands trafficking-related offenses to cover parts containing precious metals and CHOP SHOP activity. Penalties include fines and imprisonment up to five years, with concurrent sentencing provisions to ensure consistency with related offenses and to enhance deterrence.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Transportation across all five countries.
Explore Transportation in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Law-enforcement agencies gain a clear trail for investigations through markings and databases linking VINs to converters.
- Vehicle manufacturers and dealers get standardized marking requirements that deter theft and simplify compliance and enforcement.
- Fleet owners, rental companies, and repair shops benefit from reduced theft risk and easier verification of parts.
- Nonprofit crime-prevention groups can leverage the grant program to support local anti-theft efforts.
- Consumers in high-theft areas face lower risk of vehicle theft and resale of stolen parts.
Who Bears the Cost
- Manufacturers incur initial production and marking costs to comply with new converter marking rules.
- Salvage yards and parts sellers must implement enhanced recordkeeping and verification processes.
- Some buyers may be affected by the shift from cash to traceable payment methods, increasing administrative burdens for small transactions.
- Regulatory and law-enforcement agencies may incur ongoing enforcement and compliance costs to administer the program and the grant allocations.
- Small businesses in the auto-recycling ecosystem might need training and system upgrades to meet new reporting requirements.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether a universal federal marking and VIN-tracing regime can deter catalytic converter theft effectively without imposing prohibitive costs on manufacturers, sellers, and small businesses, while ensuring privacy protections and practical enforcement across diverse jurisdictions.
The PART Act represents a robust federal approach to curb catalytic converter theft, but it introduces a broad compliance regime that will require coordination across agencies, manufacturers, and the aftermarket. The effectiveness of mandated markings and VIN-based traceability depends on the quality and interoperability of databases, cross-state information sharing, and adequate funding for enforcement and compliance.
There is a risk that the required allocations may be insufficient to scale nationwide, potentially leading to uneven implementation. Privacy and civil-liberties concerns arise from linking VINs to individual vehicles in a public-facing or law-enforcement-accessible database, even if access is limited to law enforcement.
The act also assumes that the new penalties and reporting requirements will deter criminals, but it does not fully assess transitional costs for small businesses or the potential for temporary disruptions in legitimate transactions during the transition period.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.