The Federal Firefighters Families First Act amends Title 5 to increase the retirementable pay base for federal firefighters by (1) changing the hourly-rate divisor used to compute basic pay under 5 U.S.C. 5545b and (2) adding a rule that includes half of a firefighter’s basic hourly rate multiplied by regularly recurring overtime hours in the statutory definition of “average pay” used for annuity calculations. The bill also directs OPM to set, within one year, regulations defining the maximum number of regularly recurring hours that make up a firefighter’s workweek, capped at an average of 60 hours per week.
For policy and compliance professionals, the bill matters because it mechanically increases the pensionable salary used to calculate CSRS and FERS annuities for covered firefighters, shifts actuarial costs to the retirement systems and agencies employing firefighters, and creates new administrative and recordkeeping tasks for agencies and OPM to implement the overtime inclusion and workweek cap.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill amends 5 U.S.C. 5545b to (a) replace the numeric factor currently used to compute an hourly basic pay rate, and (b) add a provision that for retirement computations includes an amount equal to one-half the firefighter’s basic hourly rate times the number of overtime hours that are part of the firefighter’s regular tour of duty. It also requires OPM to issue regs establishing a maximum regularly recurring workweek, not to exceed an average of 60 hours per week.
Who It Affects
Career federal firefighters paid under Title 5 pay provisions (and agencies that employ them) are directly affected, along with OPM, agency payroll and HR offices, and the CSRS/FERS retirement systems. The change also affects actuaries, payroll vendors, and unions/representatives negotiating pay and tours of duty.
Why It Matters
By adding scheduled overtime into the retirementable pay base (albeit at half the basic hourly rate) and changing the hourly-rate computation, the bill will raise annuity amounts for many federal firefighters and thus increase future retirement liabilities and employer contributions, while altering how agencies structure tours of duty and document regularly recurring hours.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill revises the formula used to convert annual pay into a basic hourly rate by substituting the numeric factor used in section 5545b. That change affects the underlying hourly rate that the statute references when it later adds overtime into the retirementable pay calculation.
Separately, the bill creates a new statutory rule for computing “average pay” for annuities: for firefighters covered by section 5545b(b), retirementable pay will include, in addition to the existing elements, an amount equal to one-half of the basic hourly rate times the number of overtime hours that count as part of the firefighter’s regular tour of duty for the period in question.
Practically, the statute is not adding full overtime pay to retirementable earnings; it adds 50% of the basic hourly rate for each scheduled overtime hour that is part of the regular tour. The provision ties into the statutory definitions of “average pay” used by both CSRS and FERS (sections 8331(4) and 8401(3)), so the increase applies when agencies and OPM compute a retiree’s final average pay for annuity calculation purposes.
The bill also changes cross-references in the statute so that those “average pay” rules are explicitly subject to the new subsection.To limit how much overtime can be treated as a regular part of a firefighter’s week, the bill orders OPM to issue regulations within one year prescribing the maximum number of regularly recurring hours that compose a firefighter’s workweek, and it caps that maximum at an average of 60 hours per week. Finally, the bill phases in application prospectively: the amended computation rules apply only to annuity entitlements based on separations occurring more than 60 days after enactment, avoiding retroactive benefit increases but affecting future retirements.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill replaces the numeric factor “2756” with “2087” in 5 U.S.C. 5545b, changing the denominator used to compute the basic hourly pay rate referenced elsewhere in the statute.
It adds subsection 5545b(e), which requires including in ‘average pay’ an amount equal to one‑half the firefighter’s basic hourly rate multiplied by the number of overtime hours that are part of the firefighter’s regular tour of duty for the period being calculated.
The inclusion of scheduled overtime applies specifically to the statutory definitions of ‘average pay’ in 5 U.S.C. 8331(4) and 8401(3), so it affects annuity calculations under both CSRS and FERS.
OPM must issue regulations within one year establishing what counts as the regularly recurring hours of a firefighter’s workweek, and those regulations cannot allow an average workweek greater than 60 hours.
The new retirement computation rules apply only to annuities based on separations occurring more than 60 days after the date of enactment, so there is no retroactive increase to annuities earned for separations before that window.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title and stated purposes
Section 1 gives the Act its official name and lists four purposes: improve pay equality for federal firefighters, enhance recruitment and retention, include regularly recurring scheduled hours when computing retirement benefits, and establish the regular workweek. The practical effect is to frame subsequent amendments as benefits- and recruitment-oriented fixes rather than across-the-board pay raises, which can matter for how agencies and stakeholders interpret intent during implementation and rulemaking.
Numeric change to hourly-rate computation in 5 U.S.C. 5545b
Section 2 makes two parallel edits to 5 U.S.C. 5545b by replacing the factor “2756” with “2087” in the specified subsections. That numeric substitution alters the basic hourly rate used in statutory formulas: a smaller denominator raises the computed hourly rate, which then feeds into any calculation that references that rate (including the new overtime inclusion). Agencies and payroll systems will need to update the formula and ensure pay and retirement payroll interfaces use the new divisor going forward.
Add retirementable overtime credit to average‑pay definitions
Section 3 appends a new subsection (e) to 5545b that instructs OPM/agencies to include, when computing ‘average pay’ for annuities, an extra amount equal to one-half the basic hourly rate times the number of scheduled overtime hours that are part of the regular tour of duty. The section also makes conforming edits to the CSRS and FERS average-pay definitions so they are explicitly subject to this addition. The net mechanics: final average salary (the basis for annuity calculations) will increase for firefighters whose regular tours include scheduled overtime, but only by the statutory half‑rate multiplied by those hours.
OPM rulemaking and maximum regular workweek
Section 4 requires OPM, within one year, to promulgate regulations defining the maximum number of regularly recurring hours that make up a firefighter’s workweek and caps that maximum at an average of 60 hours per week. This creates a statutory ceiling on how much scheduled overtime can be treated as part of the regular tour for retirement purposes, and places the detailed work of defining ‘regularly recurring’ and averaging methods with OPM rather than Congress. Agencies will need to track hours against the OPM standard to calculate retirementable overtime.
Prospective application
Section 5 limits the bill’s effect to annuity entitlements based on separations occurring more than 60 days after enactment. That choice avoids retroactive benefit increases and the large lump-sum liabilities that could follow, but it does mean administrative systems must implement the new rules quickly to affect retirements that occur within a short window after enactment.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Employment across all five countries.
Explore Employment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Career federal firefighters whose regular tours include scheduled overtime — they will see higher retirementable earnings because the statute adds 50% of their basic hourly rate for scheduled overtime hours into the ‘average pay’ calculation, increasing final annuity amounts.
- Firefighter unions and bargaining representatives — the change converts part of scheduled overtime into pensionable pay, strengthening collective bargaining claims about total compensation and recruitment/retention leverage.
- Federal land and public-safety agencies that struggle to recruit and retain seasoned firefighters — higher pensionable pay can make federal firefighter jobs relatively more competitive with municipal and private-sector counterparts.
- Actuaries and retirement counselors — they gain clearer statutory guidance allowing more accurate projection of firefighter retirement benefits (once OPM issues implementing regulations).
Who Bears the Cost
- OPM and agency HR/payroll offices — they must create new rules, update payroll systems, document regularly recurring hours, and produce compliance procedures, all requiring staff time and possibly new IT work.
- Federal retirement systems and Treasury (i.e., taxpayers) — higher computed average pay increases long‑term annuity liabilities and may raise employer contribution rates for agencies with firefighter employees.
- Agencies that employ firefighters — higher retirement costs will increase agency personnel budgets and could require reallocation of discretionary funds or increased appropriation requests.
- Payroll vendors and third‑party administrators — they will face implementation and testing work to feed the new divisor and overtime‑inclusion logic into payroll-to-retirement interfaces, with associated costs.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing fairer retirement recognition for firefighters — who often work predictable, scheduled overtime — against the fiscal and administrative burden of increasing pensionable pay: doing more for recruitment and parity raises long‑term costs and implementation complexity for agencies and taxpayers, and the bill delegates crucial definitional choices to OPM, which must strike a practical line between generosity and fiscal manageability.
The bill mixes two levers — changing the hourly-rate divisor and adding a partial overtime credit — that both raise the retirementable pay base but in different ways. The divisor change affects every calculation that references the basic hourly rate, while the overtime inclusion targets only regularly scheduled overtime.
That combination can amplify pension increases, but the statute leaves important definitional work to OPM (e.g., what counts as ‘regularly reoccurring’ hours and how multi‑period averaging works), creating implementation risk and room for litigation over scope and classification.
Operationally, the half‑rate formula invites questions about interaction with premium pay rules, collective-bargaining classifications of tours, and positions that do not have a stable “regular” tour (seasonal or intermittents). The 60‑hour average cap limits exposure but does not resolve how agencies should document recurring hours, how to treat split tours or on‑call requirements, or whether any retroactive adjustments to earlier payroll records will be needed for pending retirements that fall into the 60‑day window.
Finally, while the bill is drafted to be prospective (separations after 60 days), the actuarial impact on retirement trust funds will depend on future agency hiring, retirements, and OPM’s regulatory choices — all uncertain at enactment.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.